Skip to comments.
Craig entitled to his privacy, ACLU argues
Star Tribune.com ^
| January 15, 2008
| Associated Press
Posted on 01/15/2008 6:39:00 PM PST by phatus maximus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
To: doc1019
Besides tapping his foot (a subjective call at best) what did he do wrong? Everything he did was within the parameters of legality … so say the ACLU. What was he arrested for? (not on his side … pervert to the max, just questioning as a legal question?Good question. I asked a buddy of mine Dick Weiner over at the law firm of Weiner, Johnson and Wang and he said that the prosecutions case is hard to win. It would probably end in a hung jury and Craig would not receive a stiff sentence.
41
posted on
01/16/2008 8:09:01 PM PST
by
Eric Blair 2084
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
To: phatus maximus
Um...They’re called PUBLIC bathrooms for a reason.
42
posted on
01/16/2008 8:10:37 PM PST
by
Cymbaline
(I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stres)
To: Eric Blair 2084
He needs to stop tap dancing around the guilt, take a hands on approach and pull at the root of the problem.
43
posted on
01/17/2008 8:39:49 AM PST
by
TheKidster
(you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson