Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Charging in SC! Within 1 of Romney, 3 of Huckster!!
Rasmussen Reports ^ | 1/13/08 | Rasmussen Reports

Posted on 01/14/2008 5:14:55 PM PST by County Agent Hank Kimball

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-247 next last
To: Route66

I will do everything I can do to insist that happens! FRed must win South Carolina. Mitt does not. It does not makes sense to vote for Mitt against FRed in SC and allow Huckster to win. If anybody cared for FRed or Mitt, they will ensure that FRED wins SC!


221 posted on 01/14/2008 10:24:03 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

He never said he would drop out if he didn’t get number one.


222 posted on 01/14/2008 10:29:31 PM PST by Politicalmom (I'm the aunt of a brand-new Naval Officer. I'm proud of you, Kristi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I will do everything I can do to insist that happens!

It's not within your control. That's the point. We can each control only one thing.... Our own vote. It should be placed where it belongs, with the conservative candidate we support, not bargained away playing some "I'll vote for yours if you'll vote for mine" sucker game.

At this point in the contest, it would take omniscience to know how things will turn out, so the right thing to do is to keep supporting the right man while there is a chance he can win, and Fred can still win.

223 posted on 01/14/2008 10:34:52 PM PST by Route66 (America's Main Street - - - Fred D. Thompson / Consistent Conservative...The One with Gravitas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Route66

A good point, but I definitely would be very disappointed if McCain or Huckster wins the nomination. I can only accept Fred, Mitt or Ducan winning it. I know I don’t have much control, but I can certainly hope for the latter.


224 posted on 01/14/2008 10:40:02 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
Yep, I say put a shock collar on him and send him to the UN.

Photobucket

225 posted on 01/14/2008 10:44:23 PM PST by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball

Chard

Chard
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Plantae

Subkingdom: Tracheobionta

Superdivision: Spermatophyta

Division: Magnoliophyta

Class: Magnoliopsida

Subclass: Caryophyllidae

Order: Caryophyllales

Family: Amaranthaceae

Genus: Beta

Species: B. vulgaris

Subspecies: B. v. var. cicla

Trinomial name
Beta vulgaris var. cicla
(L.) K.Koch


226 posted on 01/14/2008 10:53:22 PM PST by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball
Photobucket

The Chard of the Red Newt!

227 posted on 01/14/2008 10:58:35 PM PST by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Is it imparative that FRed get number one or will a number two spot keep him alive? FRed said that he would drop out if he did not get number one but might reconsider if he gets number two?

My belief is that Fred easily stays alive with a solid second place in SC and probably stays alive with a respectable third. Fred has not, and I expect will not, set a do-or-die goal for himself in SC or anywhere else. This is presently a five-way race and Team Fred seems to believe Fred can best any of the other four candidates in a head-to-head contest. Staying in is the goal here.

228 posted on 01/14/2008 11:12:55 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

They grow Chard in Ohio!?!


229 posted on 01/14/2008 11:21:11 PM PST by TeleStraightShooter (The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

I hope someone else was able to answer your question, because I don’t know that origin. I’d love to see that thread, though.


230 posted on 01/15/2008 4:26:20 AM PST by Clara Lou (Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: txflake

Mope, indeed. I thought the original title was great. Charding is cool.


231 posted on 01/15/2008 4:28:01 AM PST by Clara Lou (Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: AllseeingEye33
Fred is currently in 4th place in SC, how in the world can people call this charging?

You nailed it. I opened this expecting to hear some good news. This just means Fred is going home after SC.

232 posted on 01/15/2008 4:29:22 AM PST by imd102 (Mitt & Fred in '08 - the only chance vs. Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball

Which candidate do you think most likely to have support that otherwise would logically gravitate to Thompson if they really could see the conservative credentials of their candidate versus Thompson?


233 posted on 01/15/2008 4:32:32 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txflake

What’s that got to do with my post?


234 posted on 01/15/2008 5:13:06 AM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch
Solicitations are not allowed on FR.
235 posted on 01/15/2008 5:18:24 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Honeybunch
Solicitations are not allowed on FR.
236 posted on 01/15/2008 5:18:58 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

Beat those cheating midgets!


237 posted on 01/15/2008 7:50:35 AM PST by RGPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

Defeat those cheating midgets.


238 posted on 01/15/2008 7:57:00 AM PST by RGPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: txflake
The body language lady last night had me fuming! Great, she again thought Mrs. Clinton's cackle has got to go. However, she always explains what the movements or looks mean on the person--not with Fred just saying that he had terrible body lingo, bad facial expressions and posture. Then she said that mayyyyyyybe Huck's look on his face when Fred was spanking him was perhaps telling but perhaps not. Segment over!

I am not an expert but I thought there was rising emotion and passion in Fred's voice during that answer.
239 posted on 01/15/2008 8:07:13 AM PST by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball

I wonder, can I use my Master Chard to donate to FRed?


240 posted on 01/15/2008 8:12:42 AM PST by papasmurf (I'm voting for FRed, even if I have to write him in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson