Posted on 01/11/2008 6:59:44 AM PST by jdm
You can stop lying about what I have said. What I said was that we serve Cuban Americans in Florida for their patriotism by denying trade to Cuba and that they have earned that service. I knkw that airhead trade almighty types may disagree with that policy, but ask me if I care. I don't.
Ron Paul is a treasonous weasel by opposing our military and our government in the prosecution of this war. George Bush is a patriot whetever his flaws. Paul's supporters lust for further abandonment of American interests by pulling all troops home from everywhere and being a good, tame, little paleopeacecreep nation. As a former Libertarian Party state officer who grew up and quit the LP when the Libertarians began their enthusiasm for legalized baby-killing and other evils, I would remind you that conservatism is considerably more than mindless materialism. In fact, materialism is and ought to be very low on the totem pole.
Considering that you can and do support the paleopipsqueak for POTUS, your every insult is a compliment. Pour it on.
Meanwhile, I shall call you: The Windtunnel Libertoonian Problem unless and until you grow up.
I didn’t know much about him till 5 or 6 months ago, when someone pointed out his connection with Willis Carto, which I didn’t believe. For about 6 hours. IMO he’s a disgrace, the GOP should have no part of him. If people want to vote for him, that’s their option.
FYI
I’m no fan of Paleos or Paultards, but sheesh.
Just because someone disagrees with you on something doesn’t make them fundamentally twisted and evil. They could just be mistaken. Or deceived.
I’m sure you’re a perfectly reasonable person in real life, but that post of yours screams “crank.” :p
I only tell you that because you seem to care about people’s e-opinions of you.
“Even Erik Dondero, who hates Paul’s guts, doesn’t think Paul wrote the articles.”
Where did he say that?
As to your last paragraph, your personal habits are your business.
Mind you, I agree with a whole lot of what you’re saying in other posts! But this level of rage can serve no good purpose.
“2CAVTrooper (The next thing from the ron paullution supporters: Krystalnacht)”
I’m going to smash my own windows now?
Oy! :)
“Unfortunately for Paul, the largest Libertarian magazine seems to think he did.”
Yeah they do think he wrote them.
“As to your last paragraph, your personal habits are your business.”
You have no sense of humor what so ever.
Again, trade with Vietnam and with Red China is a disgrace. I did not say treason. Yet you repeatedly claim that I called such trade treason. Stop lying.
But In every instance Paul says “They have a right to believe in me I don’t believe in them.”
He makes Bubba look solid and honest.
No one can pinpoint what Paul believes in, stands for, has done or will do.
In his ten terms what has he accomplished to make the govt smaller?
Not being a libertarian I have to ask: Which Mag is that?
2. A person mistaken or deceived into supporting abortion or other perversions may well be mistaken or deceived but that person still does support something fundamentally twisted and evil. As even la Rand used to say with Aristotle: A is A.
3. The defeat of the US in the WOT is fundamentally twisted and evil. Withdrawal without unconditional total victory is defeat and is fundamentally twisted and evil. See Korea. See Viet Nam.
4. If the best argument a person can make for such fundamentally twisted and evil phenomena as abortion or loss of war by withdrawal is that one person's argument is as good as another's, then that is not much of an argument.
5. View me as you will. As my posts go, #253 is pretrty tame stuff. If you think I am a "crank" on the basis of such mild evidence, feel free. It won't change one word of #253 which I stand behind.
CAMERON: Congressman Paul, many of your supporters call themselves 9/11 Troofers. They believe that the U.S. government was in some way complicit with the 9/11 attacks or covered it up.
Are you tonight prepared to either embrace that rhetoric or ask those supporters to abandon it, or divorce themselves from your candidacy?
PAUL: Well, I can’t tell people what to do, but I’ve abandoned those viewpoints. I don’t believe that, and that’s the only thing that is important. And so I don’t endorse anything they say.
Nor do you.
Things that make you go HMMMMM!!!!
You are definitely NOT a crank. ;) If you are, then I am since I agree with all of those policy statements you just made.
I just fear that being too harsh with our condemnations will drive people away who might otherwise have been inclined to give us a fair hearing.
Vinegar, honey, flies, etc.
Exactamundo!!! Very nice.
Just switch 'liberal' to 'conservative'.
Paul often puts his foot in his mouth unwittingly. As he did here. Just as he did in the Dallas news article where he admits to writing articles, and again later where he denies authorship. Liars are caught because they can't keep track of all their lies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.