Skip to comments.
Baltimore Is Suing Bank Over Foreclosure Crisis
New York Times ^
| January 8, 2008
| Gretchen Morgenson
Posted on 01/10/2008 9:44:12 AM PST by Lorianne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Isn't Mayor Dixon the one who thew a shoe at a white city councilman and saying "Now the shoe is on the other foot" ?
1
posted on
01/10/2008 9:44:13 AM PST
by
Lorianne
To: Lorianne
How long until ‘Bama and Hillary start demanding that loans for any Minority be at least 1/2% below Prime?
2
posted on
01/10/2008 9:48:02 AM PST
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: Lorianne
The other side of the coin.
3
posted on
01/10/2008 9:50:34 AM PST
by
TexanToTheCore
(If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
To: Lorianne
The banks got sued for red-lining (i.e. not lending to blacks with poor credit); now they are being sued for predatory lending (i.e. lending to blacks with poor credit.)
4
posted on
01/10/2008 9:51:09 AM PST
by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order.)
To: Lorianne
And yet when cities complain about banks not lending for urban properties, they whine too. . .
You can’t have it both ways. . .
5
posted on
01/10/2008 9:51:12 AM PST
by
Salgak
(Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border: I dare you to try and cross it. . .)
To: Lorianne
Don’t loan them money and you are racist. Loan them money and you are predatory. This is a no-win for lenders.
6
posted on
01/10/2008 9:53:38 AM PST
by
Niteranger68
(Questions are free. Answers are $1. Correct answers are $5.)
To: Salgak
Hmm...and the City’s standing to sue to bank comes from WHERE?
7
posted on
01/10/2008 9:54:13 AM PST
by
Right Cal Gal
(Remember Billy Dale!!!)
To: ccmay
Liberalism, fails every time it’s tried.
8
posted on
01/10/2008 9:54:34 AM PST
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: Lorianne
This is crazy. Now Baltimore is contending that the situation is created because the banks did not use “traditional” criteria to qualify the loans. If the banks had used “traditional” criteria, many blacks in Baltimore would not be qualified for the loans, and that would bring accusations of red lining or minorities were treated too harshly. In the past banks were told by state and federal government to loosen up on the minorities.
9
posted on
01/10/2008 9:55:12 AM PST
by
Fee
To: ccmay
Yep, that’s about the size of it.
10
posted on
01/10/2008 9:57:20 AM PST
by
Lorianne
To: theDentist
How long until Bama and Hillary start demanding that loans for any Minority be at least 1/2% below Prime?..
What’s been lost in this whole sub-prime mess is the fact that the democrats and other race-baiters Mau-Mau’ed banks to make subprime loans or be accused of ‘redlining’ minority communities out of access to credit. It started in the 80’s and bloomed when Clinton got ‘Fair Credit’ regulations in place in the nineties forcing banks to make loans to credit risks in order to meet targets of face sanctions.
The banks are not completely off the hook because they took it up with a vengeance once they figured out how to slice bad credit risks into’products’ they could sell off.
To: Fee
Why doesn’t Baltimore sue the Teacher’s Union for preparing the students so miserably that they couldn’t figure out that an ARM means the interest rate could go up some time in the future?
To: Lorianne
It’s my understanding that the current foreclosure “crisis” was caused by mortgage companies, not banks.
13
posted on
01/10/2008 9:59:09 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Lorianne
Let's see. I read the first sentence. Can I guess the rest of the article? It's based on one of two statistics--black people have higher interest rates or more foreclosures.
Now I can read the article and see if I'm right.
To: Lorianne
Wells Fargo was charging higher fees to certain borrowers. These borrowers paid more under the banks subprime lending program, designed for less creditworthy consumers that the bank felt
were more likely to default on their loans. Looks like the bank was right.
15
posted on
01/10/2008 10:01:53 AM PST
by
icwhatudo
(The rino borg...is resistance futile?)
To: Lorianne
I wonder if this lashing out at the banks by the Baltimore loons has anything to do with the fact that as property values in many areas begin to correct, property tax revenues may begin to decline, hurting the ability of local and city governments to keep their promises (which were made based on the idea that housing prices would keep going up forever).
Any FReeper who sees error in my logic, please feel free to (gently) correct me.
16
posted on
01/10/2008 10:02:03 AM PST
by
rabscuttle385
(It takes courage to grow up and turn out to be who you really are.)
To: Lorianne
Some municipalities, including Cleveland and Buffalo, are trying to make lenders responsible for abandoned properties to ward off crimes like arson, drug use and prostitution.The issue is that the banks take too long to place the property 'for sale'.
There are 18 MILLION vacant homes across the country....but there are ONLY 2 MILLION of them 'for sale'.
The banks don't take the 'loss' on the books until they are 'sold'....thus they hold them for lengthy periods.
17
posted on
01/10/2008 10:02:51 AM PST
by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
To: Oshkalaboomboom
Also for not reading their paperwork on interest-nly loans that advised that the five years of unpaid principal would be due and owing at the end of the interest-only term
18
posted on
01/10/2008 10:03:56 AM PST
by
Right Cal Gal
(Remember Billy Dale!!!)
To: Lorianne
Can we please not post that picture of Kerry and Edwards? It looks so gay!!
19
posted on
01/10/2008 10:04:13 AM PST
by
JackDanielsOldNo7
(On guard until the seal is broken)
To: rabscuttle385; Lorianne
Oops! I should have read the article first. FTA:
"The complaint requests unspecified damages to cover the diminished property tax revenues and higher costs that the city said it had incurred. Additional costs include those for fire and police protection in hard-hit neighborhoods and expenditures to buy and rehabilitate vacant properties." Stupid liberals...always the victim.
20
posted on
01/10/2008 10:04:37 AM PST
by
rabscuttle385
(It takes courage to grow up and turn out to be who you really are.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson