Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gordon Brown goes nuclear (BRITAIN to build new generation of nuclear power stations)
The Sun (U.K.) ^ | January 7, 2007 | GEORGE PASCOE-WATSON

Posted on 01/07/2008 7:36:07 PM PST by Stoat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: coconutt2000
Unless we act fast, we may soon have to think twice before boiling a kettle or switching on the lights.

This is what happens when one threatens a Brit's tea.

LMAO

Or their internet connection  :-)

21 posted on 01/07/2008 8:41:18 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thinking
“We must not rely on other nations”

There is a message here.......

Hopefully our own politicians will not be so timid that they refuse to hear it.

22 posted on 01/07/2008 8:44:12 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Who’d have thought that the U.K. under Gordon Brown would have more sense about solving the power crisis than America?

The U.S. is behind on many technology and infrastructure issues. I believe one of the biggest reasons is our litigious society. France gets most of their power from nuclear but the litigation risks are huge in the U.S. A court broke up the finest phone system in the world and now we are well behind especially in broadband. Foreign designed cars long ago passed U.S. innovation. Other countries are exploiting all of their energy resources and the U.S. sits on theirs while sending their money abroad largely because of the "green" idiots.

This decline must be stopped.

23 posted on 01/07/2008 8:44:58 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
Good for the UK! Screw the Enviroweenie Luddites.

I just hope and pray that the right-thinking politicians have the strength and courage to stand up to them for the long haul, because it will indeed be a long haul.

Now that it's glaringly obvious to everyone (except for the unhinged hysterics over at Democrat Underground) that we will prevail handily in Iraq, the Left will be looking for a new bogeyman.  I'm sure that they will be delighted to resurrect all of the old idiocy that they used to inflict at nuke plants in the 1970's and 1980's.

24 posted on 01/07/2008 8:49:54 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Who’d have thought that the U.K. under Gordon Brown would have more sense about solving the power crisis than America?

Even the obvious truth eventually has to be accepted, even by the Left, when no other option exists  :-)

They have run out of silly, ineffectual, feel-good plans for energy management and have been backed against a wall.

One naturally wonders what the world would be like today if the Left had not stood in the way of this obvious solution back in the 1970's and 1980's....the Saudis would not be quite so rich, buying that new electric-powered hot tub for The Cicero Estates would be easy to justify, and the nuclear power industry would probably be as robust and vibrant as the tech industry.

25 posted on 01/07/2008 9:11:04 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dodger
But for the Radical lefty anti-nukers of the 1980’s — now ranting about global warming — we would be energy independent today and the Arab oilers would be far, far less strategically powerful.

Amazing none of the Republicans have hammered this point ....

This is actually excellent timing from the Brits....any American politician who wants to instantly catch fire and set himself ahead of the pack can point to this new British nuclear initiative and cite it as something our country should emulate.

Any of them who puts forth a comprehensive pro-nuclear plan would surge in the polls, I'll bet.

26 posted on 01/07/2008 9:19:54 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: barryg

No question about it — that WILL be a good thing. Unless, of course, like Algore, you really enjoy shivering in the dark (or at least WATCHING other folks shiver in the dark).


27 posted on 01/08/2008 6:11:46 AM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

I fully agree!


28 posted on 01/10/2008 8:55:12 PM PST by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT
The design calls for a cylinders filled with small spheres of nuclear material. As the nuclear power decays, they remove the spheres from the bottom, rejuvenate the sphere and put it back in the top. This type of generator is cleaner and somehow not referred to as a breeder.

It's called a Pebble Bed Reactor

29 posted on 01/22/2008 5:02:39 AM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
I believe one of the biggest reasons is our litigious society. France gets most of their power from nuclear but the litigation risks are huge in the U.S.

For us to go nuke, we first need legislation that will put a lid on the lawyers

30 posted on 01/22/2008 5:03:51 AM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT
It is supposed to be the safest and most cost-effective nuclear power plant ever designed. Where is one for us?

The Pebble Bed reactor takes advantage of a physics principle called Doppler Broadening:

When a reactor gets hotter, the accelerated motion of the atoms in the fuel increases the probability of neutron capture by U-238 atoms. When the uranium is heated, its nuclei move more rapidly in random directions, and therefore see and generate a wider range of relative neutron speeds. U-238, which forms the bulk of the uranium in the reactor, is much more likely to absorb fast neutrons.[1] This reduces the number of neutrons available to cause U-235 fission, reducing the power output by the reactor.

In some reactor designs, such as the pebble bed reactor, this natural negative feedback places an inherent upper limit on the temperature at which the chain reaction can proceed. Such reactors are said to be "inherently safe" because a reactor failure cannot generate a criticality excursion. It is worth noting, however, that because of decay heat emitted from the decay of fission products, a meltdown is still theoretically possible if the ability to cool the reactor is lost, and thus the reactor design must be designed to prevent loss of coolant accident.

In a nutshell, if the reactor temperature goes up, the amount of energy produced goes down, and the reactor temp stays stable. Instead of water, the PBR uses helium gas (which cannot be made radioactive by neutrons).

One cute aspect is the waste heat can be used in coal-to-gasoline conversion (which needs a high-temp steam input)

31 posted on 01/22/2008 5:16:22 AM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Good for the UK. I hope we are close behind.


32 posted on 01/22/2008 5:17:17 AM PST by Tribune7 (Dems want to rob from the poor to give to the rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Good for the UK. I hope we are close behind.

Agreed.  The only thing that stands in our way is the militant environmental Left and the Dems / Socialists, who are one in the same.  Their hysterical overreactions to nuclear power will insure that we will be energy-dependent to muslim and other unfriendly nations for generations to come.

33 posted on 01/22/2008 9:23:46 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson