Posted on 01/03/2008 6:31:12 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
I’m sorry. I thought you were trying to link the two in your #74.
That reminds me . . . Heineken is on sale at the store. 24 12 oz. bottles for 9.95 jobs.
“I’m sorry. I thought you were trying to link the two in your #74.”
Not in the sense that a tax cut has to be “paid for” - just acknowledging that there is always an increased spending penalty to be paid whenever you have a Congress that is hostile towards letting taxpayers keep more of their own money.
Perhaps the Pres can issue each of us a few shares in Exxon or the New York Yankees. If you own it, then when you gas up you are actually paying yourself. That’s the way it is done.
Hey it wasn't Hillary or Obama or the economic ignorant that caused the current problems or made Bush consider a stimulus package. It was your think-alikes. Face-it voters rule not charts.
Hey, I didn't cause the current problems either. Glad we got that straightened out.
It was your think-alikes.
How did my think-alikes cause problems?
Face-it voters rule not charts.
I know, even dumb voters.
With Huckabee soaring in the polls, this is the best thing the White House could do to gain a little more popularity, I mean after yesterday’s Huckaboom isn’t it obvious that many in the party LOVE the government?
Sounds like a bad idea to me, even if it included an income tax cut. He ought to drop support for subsidized biofuels, as it appears to be driving up the cost of food. That and reduce corporate income taxes, capital gains taxes.
He can stop sending money, jobs and intellectual property out of country to pay for the falsely named “free trade”. That’ll save a trillion.
Yes, I’m sure that sparking another world-wide recession will help our economy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.