Skip to comments.
Bush Exploring Economic Stimulus Package
Associated Press ^
| Thursday January 3, 2008
| Deb Riechmann
Posted on 01/03/2008 6:31:12 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Bush is exploring an economic stimulus package to reinforce the U.S. economy. institute economic central planning thus institutionalizing the "free trade" agenda his administration has followed from the outset..
To: hedgetrimmer
Why not stimulate oil drilling? I know a few sure spots ... ANWR, Destin dome, probably a few more off the coasts.
But I doubt the Dims would go along with it, it’s not in their socialist agenda to help people, improve people’s lives or make America more prosperous, but they are right there with the save the planet nonsense, save us from from freezing.
The good news is when the dims turn down the stimulus package then they own the recession.
2
posted on
01/03/2008 6:36:02 PM PST
by
Tarpon
(Ignorance, the most expensive commodity produced by mankind.)
To: calcowgirl; nicmarlo; texastoo; William Terrell; cinives; Czar; Borax Queen; janetgreen; Rockitz; ..
A consequence of “free trade” PING
3
posted on
01/03/2008 6:36:59 PM PST
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: hedgetrimmer
“We are all Keynesians now.”
4
posted on
01/03/2008 6:38:11 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(11+7+15=3 Heismans)
To: hedgetrimmer
The upcoming recession is the result of free trade?
5
posted on
01/03/2008 6:39:09 PM PST
by
spyone
To: hedgetrimmer
Why would we need a “stimulus package” if our economy was doing so great as we are endlessly told on this forum? Inflation is low, unemployment is low and there’s money a-plenty. Bush must be turning into a protectionist...
6
posted on
01/03/2008 6:40:22 PM PST
by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
To: hedgetrimmer
Lets see jorge, fuel is nearly 400% higher than when you took office, there's probably 5 million additional illegals sucking up welfare and free housing. Everything I buy costs more, and everything I sell brings less.
You’ve done a bitching job, maybe even out paced your daddy.
7
posted on
01/03/2008 6:40:46 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: hedgetrimmer
An excellent opportunity for across-the-board tax cuts and regulatory relief.
As such, I have no doubt it will be squandered.
To: hedgetrimmer
An excellent opportunity for across-the-board tax cuts and regulatory relief.
As such, I have no doubt it will be squandered.
To: dfwgator
We are all Keynesians now. My exact thought upon reading the headline.
10
posted on
01/03/2008 6:44:47 PM PST
by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: calcowgirl
What if it’s another tax cut?
11
posted on
01/03/2008 6:47:39 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: hedgetrimmer; Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama; LowCountryJoe
Check this out . . . hedgetrimmer has been waiting six years (if not longer) to post comment #1.
12
posted on
01/03/2008 6:51:54 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: spyone
It is not at all to do with free trade. It does have a lot to do with the defunct system we accept in dealing with China though.
To: 1rudeboy
What if its another tax cut?
....funded with real budget cuts!
or
....paid for with the old charge card!!
To: evaporation-plus
Tax cuts (if properly targeted) do not need to be “funded.”
15
posted on
01/03/2008 7:02:59 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: maui_hawaii
One thing I know for sure. I wish I was at Napili Bay right now.
16
posted on
01/03/2008 7:03:39 PM PST
by
spyone
To: 1rudeboy
What if its another tax cut? You mean a spending reduction? Or just more debt? Yes--there is a difference and it does matter.
17
posted on
01/03/2008 7:15:26 PM PST
by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: hedgetrimmer
Maybe I am reading this wrong. This article has stated that Manufacturing is up.
Manufacturing shrunk yesterday and was the reasong for the dip in the stock market.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22472413/
18
posted on
01/03/2008 7:20:02 PM PST
by
texastoo
((((((USA)))))((((((, USA))))))((((((. USA))))))))
To: calcowgirl
I’m sorry, when I typed “tax cut,” I assumed folks would understand that I meant “tax cut.” Such as a cut in the marginal rate.
19
posted on
01/03/2008 7:20:47 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: texastoo
That was a different measure. It was the ISM measure falling below 50 that helped cause the sell-off.
20
posted on
01/03/2008 7:22:41 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson