Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RON PAUL to DFU on Iowa radio - he would not stop ship with nuclear missiles from N. Korea to Iran
WHO RADIO in Des Moines ^ | 1-3-08 | dfu

Posted on 01/03/2008 9:15:39 AM PST by doug from upland

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-185 last
To: CharlesWayneCT
If you aren’t where the attacks happen, you don’t get hit by them.

It's a "strawman" argument. Where else would military troops be than "where attacks are happening"?

Your weak point may be your lack of knowledge on things military. The purpose of military forces is to kill people and break things. A demonstrated capability and willingness to kill people and break things has an added benefit of providing a deterrent effect, but that is not a primary purpose nor an end objective, and cannot replace the primary purpose.

In any military action, it is generally easier to kill people and break things if the military is actually located where said people and things exist.

I hope this little explanation helps you with your "problem".

181 posted on 01/12/2008 6:25:06 PM PST by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: DejaJude
I wonder what his answer would be if Iran had used those missiles to destroy Israel. Would he retaliate then? Or would he only act if they targeted us?

That would doubtless depend on whether or not he determined we had provoked them by our presence in the Persian Gulf.

182 posted on 01/12/2008 6:32:35 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: been_lurking

They would be at home, in the United States.

The argument being made was that we stuck our troops into the middle of places where it was likely people would attack them, when we had no business putting them there.

Then, when they get attacked, we count it as justification for launching a strike.


183 posted on 01/12/2008 6:35:51 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
They would be at home, in the United States.

Stupid place to keep your military. Their adversaries aren't "back home".

The argument being made was that we stuck our troops into the middle of places where it was likely people would attack them, when we had no business putting them there.

Seems you are wrong on that last point. The military is in the Middle East precisely because that is where their current "business" happens to be. Just as they are in South Korea, Japan, Okinawa, Taiwan, Germany, etc. etc. All are much closer to their "business" than "back home".

Why you cannot grasp such a simple concept is baffling.

184 posted on 01/12/2008 6:44:40 PM PST by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: been_lurking

As I explained back at the beginning, I am not arguing my own position. The statements I am making are the opinion of Ron Paul, and you may call them stupid if you like.

My point was that this was not a joke, but a serious discussion, and deserved to be addressed on it’s merits and not just laughed off.


185 posted on 01/12/2008 6:50:21 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-185 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson