Skip to comments.
Thompson sees 'bigger picture' in Bhutto slaying-'This is a war, a clash of civilizations
Worldnetdaily ^
| December 27, 2007
| Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on 12/27/2007 11:35:07 AM PST by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-189 next last
To: counterpunch
Too bad Fred waited until this week to start running for President.
You know you were wrong the first time you posted this, and you are still wrong after posting the same sentiment for the 1000th time.
To: SJackson
That’s BS about the “late entry”. That’s a cop-out. He got in months ago. The issue isn’t when he got in, but what he’s done (or hasn’t done) since then.
What he hasn’t done is campaigned vigorously or effectively.
82
posted on
12/27/2007 1:02:54 PM PST
by
counterpunch
(ABH - Anybody But Huckabee)
To: SoConPubbie
Posting in bold doesn’t actually give your words any more weight.
83
posted on
12/27/2007 1:05:37 PM PST
by
counterpunch
(ABH - Anybody But Huckabee)
To: Petronski
We lost almost 100,000 KIA in WW-III. It was global in scope with several nations on each side.
It wasn't "Cold."
84
posted on
12/27/2007 1:06:24 PM PST
by
ASA Vet
To: TheThirdRuffian
He came out (with Van Halen playing in the background or something), stepped out, channeled Jimmah Carter, then asked for forigiveness for killing Bhutto. After rereading the link that was provided earlier it seems he should have used the word condolences rather than apologizes.
85
posted on
12/27/2007 1:06:47 PM PST
by
wmfights
(LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
To: counterpunch
So after all that are you going to vote for Fred or not? I agree with most of what you said even though it is a backhanded endorsement. Also remember that your opinion is an advanced, idea driven and researched one. I have confidence that Fred is going to win the Joe Sixpacks of the world over just like W did. This is something that Willard and Rooty will have a tough time accomplishing.
86
posted on
12/27/2007 1:11:07 PM PST
by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: numberonepal
I can't point to a source at the moment, but someone might have it handy. The Bush Adm. was condemned last month for asking the NY Times to hold a story that they have been working behind the scenes to secure the nukes with the Musharraf govt. agreement.
87
posted on
12/27/2007 1:11:47 PM PST
by
wmfights
(LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
To: counterpunch
If Fred had been running an effective campaign, he would have been pounding that in almost as much as Giuliani has brought up 9/11. He references it all the time. I'll make sure to have you pinged to each and every time it shows up, if you like.
88
posted on
12/27/2007 1:12:46 PM PST
by
kevkrom
(All those in favor of Thompson, don't raise your hand.)
To: SJackson
“This is a global conflict, and al-Qaida wants to bring Western civilization to its knees.”
Bingo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
89
posted on
12/27/2007 1:13:17 PM PST
by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
To: TheThirdRuffian
With all the “slick” of Willy thrown in for good measure.
90
posted on
12/27/2007 1:15:17 PM PST
by
Uriah_lost
("I don't apologize for the United States of America," -Fred D Thompson)
To: ZULU
This is a global conflict, and al-Qaida wants to bring Western civilization to its knees.AQ is one tiny little cog in the Islamic machine. It is ISLAM that want's to destroy western civilisation. Hezb'Allah is a much bigger threat and always has been.
To: ASA Vet
WW-IV
Everyone says this but when was WW III???? I am afraid I missed it. lol.
To: counterpunch
Thats BS about the late entry. Thats a cop-out. He got in months ago. The issue isnt when he got in, but what hes done (or hasnt done) since then...What he hasnt done is campaigned vigorously or effectively. Months ago, when others were at it a year ago. I agree his campaign hasn't been effective, had he hit the ground running he might be in a different position, but the wisdom of a late entry like Thompson's, and advocated by Gingrich, or a years long perpetual campaign like Rudy or McCain or Hillary, is a question candidates will be asking themselves four years from now. Personally, I think he's had enough time.
93
posted on
12/27/2007 1:19:53 PM PST
by
SJackson
(America...thru dissent and protest lost the ability to mobilize a will to win, Col Bui Tin, PAVN)
To: kevkrom
I’ve watched the debates Fred has participated in, and so far I can’t recall once him mentioning he was an advisor to the State Department on terrorism and nuclear proliferation.
If I have to be pinged just to find out about it, then certainly your average GOP primary voter isn’t going to have heard. My main concern is him getting the word out to the masses who will be choosing the GOP nominee. I think it’s the sort of thing that could make or break the race for him.
94
posted on
12/27/2007 1:20:37 PM PST
by
counterpunch
(ABH - Anybody But Huckabee)
To: SJackson; Politicalmom; girlangler; KoRn; Shortstop7; Lunatic Fringe; Darnright; babygene; ...
If you'd like to be on the Fred ping list let me or Politicalmom know.
95
posted on
12/27/2007 1:20:42 PM PST
by
jellybean
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=dailyfread Proud Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
To: SJackson
This horrible event in Pakistian reminds us Americans that we are still in a global world war. At least Fred “gets it. “
96
posted on
12/27/2007 1:22:42 PM PST
by
Biggirl
(A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
To: napscoordinator
The Cold War was thought to be the real WWIII.
97
posted on
12/27/2007 1:24:50 PM PST
by
Biggirl
(A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
To: napscoordinator
when was WW III???? 1946-1989.
98
posted on
12/27/2007 1:25:19 PM PST
by
kevkrom
(All those in favor of Thompson, don't raise your hand.)
To: napscoordinator
Slept thru the 50’s, 60’s, 70’s, and 80’s huh?
99
posted on
12/27/2007 1:25:52 PM PST
by
ASA Vet
To: Fox_Mulder77
Or worse, Mussharaf could be next and then there is no stoping the Islamofacists from having a bomb already.
100
posted on
12/27/2007 1:26:18 PM PST
by
Biggirl
(A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-189 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson