Posted on 12/26/2007 8:43:59 AM PST by devane617
does the word infringed have any meaning at all ???
Lighten up there bud. You’re thinking about how it should be in a perfect world. I’m thinking about what we should do for STEP ONE to start getting back on track.
Baby steps.
Castle doctrine.
You lose.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1945213/posts
Best regards,
The NFA'34 rules that all firearms with a bore size over 0.5" are "destructive devices" except for those deemed by the Secretary of the Treasury to be suitable for hunting or sporting purposes. Perhaps it should say those that have ever been deemed to be suitable, but it doesn't. The restrictions on "destructive devices" like the Stryker are at least consistent with statute, which is more than can be said for those on the Akins.
It does follow the letter of the statute. It does also violate the intent. Those people in the federal government who are attacking Mr. Akins are violating the letter and intent of the law.
Not an idiot, just biased and misinformed.
Two comments:
1. Approval of the device, then banning of it after such investment is made is simply immoral at best..and criminal in my book.
2. The National Firearms Act and the Gun Control Act of 1968 - one of the most Un-Constitutional pieces of trash ever perpetrated on law-abiding citizens.
Seems to be a pretty clear cut example of unlawful takings to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.