Posted on 12/22/2007 11:35:47 PM PST by Norman Bates
What do you think?
Sounds familiar....
McCain voted against the Bush tax cuts.
~Next.~
“McCain voted against the Bush tax cuts.”
What was McCain’s reasoning on that?
McCain also maintained we would be looking at more tax cuts today had spending been reined in as a condition for the first cuts.
Because there was no mechanism to restrain spending. And look at the spending now - he was right. However he supports making them permanent because not doing so would be a de fact tax increase.
“The McCain List.
Common sense conservatism
-Repeal the AMT
-Put $60 billion back in the pockets of middle class families in the first year
-Keeping taxes low for the middle class as well as for entrepreneurs
-Commission headed by Alan Greenspan to make recommendations for tax reform
-Saving Social Security and Medicare are priorities
-Personal accounts to supplement the social security crisis
-Permanent tax ban on the Internet and cellular phone communications
-Reward savings and investment with lower taxes on dividends and capital gains
John McCain’s Comprehensive Pro-Growth Tax Agenda”
McCain has been in Senate since 1986 and before that, the House.
That’s where laws are actually made. What’s he been doing all that time?
Oh, wait he actually did vote against the Bush tax cuts before he was for them.
“To direct the tax code revisions, McCain said he’d appoint a commission headed by former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan to make recommendations for a reform for Congress to support.”
Just what government needs, another damn commission. It isn’t hard to decide what to do about taxes.....flat tax, pure and simple.
“What was McCain’s reasoning on that?”
It’s all about McCain.
He comes first.
I think it’s a bit more complicated then that. A flat tax would be ideal however given political will it is something that needs to be moved toward in steps.
“McCain also maintained we would be looking at more tax cuts today had spending been reined in as a condition for the first cuts.”
If spending cuts come first, taxes will never be cut again.
“McCain has been in Senate since 1986 and before that, the House. That’s where laws are actually made. What’s he been doing all that time?”
Why jump shark every time when there is clearly no political will to do so?
“Oh, wait he actually did vote against the Bush tax cuts before he was for them.”
I already covered this. But you knew that...
“”Now are we going to fix it the way Ronald Reagan and Tip O’Neil did back in 1983 or are we going to hand it off to an unluckier generation of Americans?” McCain asked.”
What’s the difference?
“Because there was no mechanism to restrain spending. And look at the spending now - he was right. However he supports making them permanent because not doing so would be a de fact tax increase.”
Other than flap his gums, what has McCain ever done on controlling spending?
“It’s all about McCain.
He comes first.”
It can’t come that simple!? He must have had some excuse...
“Just what government needs, another damn commission. It isn’t hard to decide what to do about taxes.....flat tax, pure and simple.”
McCain has been in Senate since 1986 and before that, the House.
That’s where laws are actually made. What’s he been doing all that time?
Oh, wait he actually did vote against the Bush tax cuts before he was for them.
Just what we need, another commission to spin their wheels on tax reform. Ugh!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.