Priceless.
Posted on 12/16/2007 4:00:59 AM PST by Bulwinkle
To bad he can’t run for President.
My wife and I order saccharine from Canada. Miles above other artificial sweeteners.
Ya done good. If all your posts are gems like this, post on, dude.
I hope someone lets Rush Limbaugh know this to let him discuss it...
It will take more time for these opinions to surface to the point that the blatant money grabbers (even self-admitted) back down. Perhaps the crumbs we offered (ageeing to further talks after W is out of office) will forestall this disaster and indeed allow the scam to become apparent.
Head honchos of the Bali summit have publically stated that economic redistribution must be at the heart of any Kyoto type agreement. You probably missed those headlines...duh. Bottom line is: the world wants to tax us in the rich and greedy US, and they frankly don't give a damn if the premise is false.
We've seen this before: charged as guilty, but proven innocent and off to jail nonetheless because we don't like you and your riches.
It's time for a new tact, which I suppose is to be sure the Senate knows this. It made me shiver when all our R candiates were ready to raise their hands in agreement last week in Iowa, until Fred stopped the charade.
He is now a Global Warming Denier and must be ignored and/or destroyed.
ALSO>>> have you read:
#1: “Carbon Emissions Don’t Cause Global Warming”
Dr David Evans
david.evans@sciencespeak.com
28 November 2007
Current Summary of Crucial Evidence
Ice Core Data Reverses — 2003
First crucial point, 2003. We’ve all seen Al Gore’s movie. It was the early, low
resolution ice core data first gathered in 1985 that convinced the world that CO2 was
the culprit: CO2 levels and temperature marched in rose and fell in lockstep over the
last half a million years, to the resolution of the old ice core data (results from 1985 –
2000, data points over a thousand years apart). It was ASSUMED (bad assumption #1 that CO2 levels controlled the world’s temperature.
After further research, new high resolution ice core results (data points only a few
hundred years apart) in 2000 – 2003 allowed us to distinguish which came first, the
temperature rises or the CO2 rises. We found that temperature changes preceded CO2
changes by an average of 800 years. So temperature caused the CO2 levels, and not the
other way around as previously assumed. The world should have started backpedalling
away from blaming carbon emissions in 2003:....
[long..]
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Evans-CO2DoesNotCauseGW.pdf
#2: -—[ABOUT THE AUTHOR of the above]-—
“I Was On the Global Warming Gravy Train”
By David Evans
I devoted six years to carbon accounting, building models for the Australian government to estimate carbon emissions from land use change and forestry.....
http://mises.org/story/2571
Priceless.
Lord Monckton has been debunking the global warming hysterial for some time. Where he was once a voice in the wilderness, he is joined daily by more and more scientists who haven’t got the stomach for the lies and fabrications.
Remember, the politicians who are pushing this issue forward know nothing about science and care less. They are using this as a means of estabishing the UN as a World taxing authority and they intend to tax the US above all.
Yes, while quite a bit of ink and electrons have been expended by journalists on the COP-13 track (Kyoto II emission reductions), the press for some reason hasn't made much of the second track, the so-called CMP-3 which finalizes many points on the "Adaptation Fund".
Since this U.N. entity is funded by extracting money from carbon trading (monetization of CERs is explicitly mentioned, though I believe that there are probably other possibilities), I would imagine that it actually received a lot of the actual attention of many of the attendees.
.
This is part 2...and should also be required viewing in our guvment schools..
thanks, bfl
Good job!
Bookmarked
My fellow-participants, there is no climate crisis. The correct policy response to a non-problem is to have the courage to do nothing. Take courage! Do nothing, and save the world’s poor from yet another careless, UN-driven slaughter.
bflr
Where does this guy get off questioning Saint Albert the Gore and scientific consensus? Because of course we all know that science has nothing to do with raising questions and voicing objections. Just like that darned Galileo or Einstein going around and raising questions about settled scientific consensus and all that...
I'm assuming that "physicalthe" is a typo, but I can't figure out how that sentence should read. Changing the sentence to "the IPCC has repealed the fundamental physical the Stefan-Boltzmann equation - that converts radiant energy to temperature." doesn't make any sense either.
Anybody care to venture a guess?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.