Skip to comments.
From bust to bounty (Tens of billions of barrels of oil in ND and Mont)
Twincities.com ^
| 12/09/2007
| LESLIE BROOKS SUZUKAMO
Posted on 12/09/2007 7:05:16 AM PST by saganite
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
1
posted on
12/09/2007 7:05:18 AM PST
by
saganite
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: Baynative
and the endangered prarie fart fly....
3
posted on
12/09/2007 7:15:13 AM PST
by
xcamel
(FDT/2008)
To: Baynative
thank you... let the injunctions commence!!!
4
posted on
12/09/2007 7:16:08 AM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist)
To: saganite
Can someone explain the process of heating the oil before they pump it out? Thanks
5
posted on
12/09/2007 7:16:43 AM PST
by
yoe
( NO THIRD TERM FOR THE CLINTON'S!!!)
To: Baynative
There has been drilling in Montana and ND for decades. It would be hard for the environmentalists to complain now, especially since even the Democrats in those states are onboard.
6
posted on
12/09/2007 7:17:09 AM PST
by
saganite
To: saganite
The oil was two miles down and trapped in tightly packed horizontal layers of shale that were easy to miss with conventional drilling.
Is this the same 'shale oil' that Jimmah predicted would be our savior from the clutches OPEC??
I'd hate to see that the ijit was right - just a few decades off. If so the moonbats will go nuts, they'll want him on Mt. Rushmore.
7
posted on
12/09/2007 7:19:12 AM PST
by
Condor51
(Rudy has more baggage than Samsonite. But that's okay, the NYPD carries it. /s)
To: yoe
They don’t heat the oil in this formation since it flows after the fracturing process. You’re probably thinking about the oil in Colorado which is even more tightly bound in the shale rock. They have been experimenting with heating that rock to unbind the oil.
8
posted on
12/09/2007 7:19:26 AM PST
by
saganite
To: xcamel
...and women and minorities to be “hit hardest” by the drilling.
To: rabidralph
But we must do it “for the children”.
10
posted on
12/09/2007 7:22:03 AM PST
by
Utah Binger
(Fred Thompson: Worth Noticing)
To: Condor51
Is this the same ‘shale oil’ that Jimmah predicted would be our savior from the clutches OPEC??
No. This oil is in shale rock but it can be extracted much easier than the shale oil Jimmuh was talking about. It’s still an expensive process but once they fracture the shale rock the oil flows as it would in a normal well. The shale oil Jimmuh was talking about either has to be mined and processed or heated in the ground over the course of years to extract the oil. Two entirely different animals here.
11
posted on
12/09/2007 7:22:58 AM PST
by
saganite
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: Baynative
It won’t happen here. The drilling in this formation has been ongoing for about a decade now and there’s been little or no effort to stop it.
13
posted on
12/09/2007 7:29:10 AM PST
by
saganite
To: saganite
In neighboring South Dakota, efforts by a Canadian pipeline company to build a crude oil pipeline from the Canadian oil shale regions across the Dakotas are similarly being stymied by environmental activists. Hyperion Oil of Texas also want to build the first new oil refinery in decades in southeastern South Dakota again guess who is opposing ...the tree huggers.
If these environmentalist wackos are so concerned about the earth why aren't they protesting in Venezuela, China or the Gulf States where environmental concerns in the oil industry are almost an afterthought?
14
posted on
12/09/2007 7:29:50 AM PST
by
The Great RJ
("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
To: Smokin' Joe
ping
See any names you recognize in this article?
15
posted on
12/09/2007 7:30:31 AM PST
by
saganite
To: yoe
Up north of Edmonton in the tar sands area, steam is injected in some of these bodies to produce a flow of heavy oil. Other locations use CO2 combined with workover fluid, which is usually a heavy cut of petroleum or petro + clay.
16
posted on
12/09/2007 7:31:09 AM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
To: saganite
There has been drilling in Montana and ND for decades. It would
be hard for the environmentalists to complain now, especially since
even the Democrats in those states are onboard.
In a sane world...you'd be right on target.
"Sixty Minutes" had a segment on the great energy reserves
under Montana and neighboring states.
A good part of the segment was about the coalition of burr-cut
ranchers and bath-once-a-year environmentalists already throwing
up roadblocks to energy projects.
At the very least, these enviro-nutburgers will slow down the
enterprise and make it more expensive.
17
posted on
12/09/2007 7:34:11 AM PST
by
VOA
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: The Great RJ
I’ve picked up chatter about this SE SD refinery project a couple of times. It looks like its target would be Twin Cities and east, via Williams. Seems like Murphy, Ashland and FHR have this covered, especially in light of their expansions.
19
posted on
12/09/2007 7:37:22 AM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
We must protest and resist this drilling, then ramp up the rhetoric of our dependence on foreign oil.
20
posted on
12/09/2007 7:45:07 AM PST
by
svanni
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson