Skip to comments.
Is Hillary’s candidacy legal?
Independent Indian, via Indian & Pakistani Friends of Ron Paul ^
| July 10, 2007
| Subroto Roy
Posted on 12/05/2007 6:49:20 PM PST by OESY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-125 next last
To: OESY
21
posted on
12/05/2007 7:05:53 PM PST
by
Waco
To: NewRomeTacitus
Edith Bolling Galt Wilson, most notably.
22
posted on
12/05/2007 7:06:40 PM PST
by
Past Your Eyes
(You knew the job was dangerous when you took it.)
To: OESY
Good grief. This is just pitiful.
23
posted on
12/05/2007 7:08:04 PM PST
by
Past Your Eyes
(You knew the job was dangerous when you took it.)
To: OESY
To: allmendream; Theodore R.; NonValueAdded; JustaDumbBlonde; Dog Gone; Lizavetta; skimbell; ...
To quote another blogger:
"But what [is] the real issue? It was concern that more than two terms as President would lead to excessive executive power and influence over government and public policy matters! The longer a person or a party holds political power, the greater the opportunity and, therefore, the possibility that he or she will seriously compromise the processes by which politics and representative government can function. When you have a charismatic leader, these concerns become even more worrisome."
COMMENT: This is a subject worthy of discussion. Hillary's election is not inevitable, Sheeple.
.
25
posted on
12/05/2007 7:16:08 PM PST
by
OESY
To: vox humana
Many foreign reporters just dont get it when trying to understand US laws and customs. I suppose we dont know much about the laws and customs of India either! LOLMaybe we write stupid articles trying to interpret their laws, but I haven't seen any that I can recall.
To put the lack of logic and rational reasoning into perspective in this piece, a US corporation is also considered as a US citizen.
So, arguably Microsoft could run for President.
26
posted on
12/05/2007 7:16:26 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: NonValueAdded
Well, Hillary did always say “We are the president.”
27
posted on
12/05/2007 7:19:36 PM PST
by
darkangel82
(And the band played on....)
To: OESY
28
posted on
12/05/2007 7:21:11 PM PST
by
wimpycat
(Hyperbole is the opiate of the activist wacko.)
To: OESY
29
posted on
12/05/2007 7:21:47 PM PST
by
dmw
(Aren't you glad you use common sense? Don't you wish everybody did?)
To: OESY
Heck with Hillary, who are the “Pakistani friends of Ron Paul” and why are they in India?
30
posted on
12/05/2007 7:23:08 PM PST
by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: freespirited
Exactly, he should be illegal to put a rapist in as POTUS, but we crossed that barrier rather easily.
To: OESY
The idea at the root of this is that marriage is a legally meaningful relationship and that spouses are one and the same person in the eyes of the law.That would make Hillary guilty of perjury and has already been impeached!
Does that mean that Hillary is guilty of being with Monica too?
To: OESY
COMMENT: This is a subject worthy of discussion. Hillary's election is not inevitable, Sheeple.Don't capitalize the "S" when calling me this. It's just not right.
33
posted on
12/05/2007 7:26:21 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: OESY
COMMENT: This is a subject worthy of discussion. Hillary's election is not inevitable, Sheeple. No court would touch the Clintons with a six foot pole!!!
34
posted on
12/05/2007 7:27:38 PM PST
by
danamco
To: OESY
One of the more stupid articles I have read. Not he stupidest, mind you.
35
posted on
12/05/2007 7:28:24 PM PST
by
Graybeard58
( Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: jiggyboy
Damn, even our whack-jobs are being outsourced to India now.LOL!
36
posted on
12/05/2007 7:30:27 PM PST
by
Azzurri
To: OESY
Who said Hillary's election was inevitable? I have, in fact, said many times that she will not win the democrat nomination.
That doesn't change the fact that her candidacy won't possibly be found to be illegal. If you want to waste the bandwidth, have at it. It is still technically a free country. ;-)
To: OESY
Well... They did market themselves as "co-Presidents" back in the '90s.
38
posted on
12/05/2007 7:31:37 PM PST
by
Redcloak
(This post certified 100% Hillary-free. um... Never mind.)
To: uptoolate
Does that mean that Hillary is guilty of being with Monica too?Could be or was Hillary gone for the day?
39
posted on
12/05/2007 7:32:02 PM PST
by
Buddy B
(MSgt Retired-USAF)
To: OESY
This is Hugh and Series. Set beebers to stun!
40
posted on
12/05/2007 7:32:12 PM PST
by
Panzerlied
("We shall never surrender!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-125 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson