Skip to comments.
New Australian Government Wants to Consider F-22 fighters
Aviation Week and Space Technology ^
| Dec 2, 2007
| Bradley Perrett
Posted on 12/02/2007 8:36:27 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: sukhoi-30mki
It seems the F-35 would give them a lot more flexibility for their money.
To: Secret Agent Man
Not Australia’s decision to make.
No.
To: Cringing Negativism Network
4
posted on
12/02/2007 8:48:53 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Democrats: "Government is god, and Hillary is its prophet....")
To: EternalVigilance
5
posted on
12/02/2007 8:54:43 PM PST
by
steel_resolve
(If you can't stand behind our troops, then please stand in front...)
To: Secret Agent Man
Why would the US think about sending F22’s to Austrailia if the new PM is going to pull out his troops?
6
posted on
12/02/2007 9:01:16 PM PST
by
jonathan-swift2000
(The Good news from Iraq the MSM won't publish.)
To: jonathan-swift2000
You know what guys? I just said the F-35 appears to be a better choice over the F-22.
I know they are pulling out their troops.
I know it’s not their decision if they get ANY of them.
Sheeeesh. Don’t read any more into what someone writes.
To: Secret Agent Man
This could be interesting. I think Australia would be better off if they went with the F-35 due to its lower production cost and its well-roundedness as both a fighter and a ground-attack aircraft.
Plus, if it was required, they could base F-35B's (the VTOL version) off the two new amphibious assault ships that will be joining the Australian fleet soon.
Having the same aircraft stationed on land as they do at sea would help cut down on the replacement parts and mechanic training that they would be required if they had F-35's at sea and F-22's on land.
8
posted on
12/02/2007 9:22:12 PM PST
by
Stonewall Jackson
(The Hunt for FRed November. 11/04/08)
To: Stonewall Jackson
The current F/A 18 purchase was to replace F111 maritime recon aircraft.
They could take a page from Singapore and buy upgraded Scooters. 404 engine, Lear avionics, GPS nav system. Failing that, a moded out 737 would do nicely as well.
9
posted on
12/02/2007 9:44:09 PM PST
by
ASOC
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: sukhoi-30mki
Let's see ... bail out on us regarding Iraq .... then ask for our best equipment.
I'm thinking a big fat NO is appropriate here.
11
posted on
12/02/2007 10:05:22 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(False modesty is as great a sin as false pride.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
No. Allies yes, first tier world movers, same for Japan, not. Hurts, but there it is.
To: sukhoi-30mki
1. If we gave Japan the F-15 and Australia the F/A-18, we can give them the F-22.
2. I hope they succeed. If the production line is open, that might give us a window to buy more for the USAF.
3. If they stick to the F-35 they will still rule the sky.
13
posted on
12/02/2007 10:29:13 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
(Support Scouting: Raising boys to be strong men and politically incorrect at the same time.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
The pro-China ear wax eating new PM will be happy to sell top secrets of F-22 Raptor to his Chicom friends. The answer is flat zero.
14
posted on
12/02/2007 11:01:28 PM PST
by
Wiz
To: Wiz
While we’re giving away technology, can we give the V-22 Osprey program away and be done with that pinnacle of aircraft design stupidity and proved death trap?
15
posted on
12/03/2007 1:21:28 AM PST
by
ME-262
(Nancy Pelosi is known to the state of CA to render Viagra ineffective causing reproductive harm.)
To: ME-262
Goto DefenseTech to read the comments of Osprey related articles, and see what happened to Christian, the administrator.
16
posted on
12/03/2007 2:57:51 AM PST
by
Wiz
To: sukhoi-30mki
I can’t wait to see the emissions report from the emissions lab in Ann Arbor on the F-22 since they are going full bore with Kyoto.../Sarcasm off..
To: Stonewall Jackson
To: ME-262
You suffer from cranial rectumitis.
To: sukhoi-30mki
Having just signed the Kyoto Accords, how can the Aussis fly these as they dump tons of CO2 into the stratosphere? (sarcasm)
20
posted on
12/03/2007 6:54:52 AM PST
by
The Great RJ
("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson