Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Facebook' bound in priest's skin for sale
Telegraph ^ | November 29, 2007 | Sally Peck

Posted on 11/29/2007 6:24:40 AM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: chuckles
Your point, if any, is that you are speculating on little or no facts.

I sometimes get a little tired of folks who take every opportunity to trash the Catholic church and call it a cult etc., whether they know any relevant facts or not.

Do some research (hopefully not on Ian Paisley's website) or ask a priest.

41 posted on 11/29/2007 5:54:40 PM PST by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

If you were a Wiccan, and someone said you were to keep a secret that a member of your church sacrificed a baby to Satan, and you said nothing because of some “code”, you are a cult. If you know of priests abusing alter boys and say nothing because of some “code of silence” you are just protecting your cult. There is way too much “silence” in all religions. Catholics always start the “Bashing” “race” card if someone makes a comment about Catholics. In my church, we have had preacher run off with the organ player, we’ve had secretaries steal money, etc. The difference is we don’t try to hide it or keep it a secret. I can guarantee you if my pastor found out about a member committing a crime, the police would be there within minutes. If you want to continue to defend a conspiracy to commit murder, the go for it. You make about as much sense as the ragheads saying they are freedom fighters when they saw off a head. If a person confesses a crime to a priest and the preist hides it, he becomes a conspirator and is as guilty. He isn’t some martyr.


42 posted on 11/29/2007 6:50:57 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wildbill

Didn’t your Mom warn you about signs that say “Wet Paint?”


Yeah! I did was what the sign said! Jeez!


43 posted on 11/29/2007 6:54:04 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido; ArrogantBustard

Priest can’t even call 9-1-1?


No, but he can dive out of the confesional and draw his Smith and Wesson while shouting, “Stop right there punk! Go ahead, make my daily bread!”


44 posted on 11/29/2007 6:59:24 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear; ArrogantBustard

So you’re saying the priest should make the collar?


45 posted on 11/29/2007 7:06:58 PM PST by Larry Lucido (Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
So you’re saying the priest should make the collar?

Yeah. And if the perp won’t come along peacefully then it’s time to send in the Nuns!

46 posted on 11/29/2007 7:21:11 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear

Only if he’s habit-ual.


47 posted on 11/29/2007 7:30:31 PM PST by Larry Lucido (Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

You win.


48 posted on 11/29/2007 7:44:14 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
Catholics always start the “Bashing” “race” card if someone makes a comment about Catholics.

No, but we do reserve the right to respond when unduly smeared. Like, for instance, if some moron is trying to justify using a priests skin to make a book because he wouldn't violate his oath. Maybe you could find a way to justify those lampshades at Nuremburg too.

49 posted on 11/29/2007 10:36:54 PM PST by Hacksaw (Appalachian by the grace of God - Montani Semper Liberi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
Your blathering now. I never mentioned the skin binding. I could care less. What I took exception to is him being called a martyr. A man of God would have revealed what he heard in confession to save lives. By not doing so, he became part of the conspiracy. How could he ignore murder? Looks like your the moron if you can't even understand English. People who can't justify their argument resort to name calling. Mighty Catholic of you.

Romans 1:32, "Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.( you don't have to be part of it to be just as guilty). How about the "Good Samaritan" parable. The religious man left the beat up guy on the road so he could follow the rules of not touching something dirty on the Sabbath. The Samaritan, which was looked down upon by the religionists, actually helped the man, but broke the rules. Which one did Jesus say did the right thing? To learn of a crime and just sit there makes you guilty as they are. Following a stupid code is choosing evil over good. Simple choice if you follow Jesus. This guy's moral compass was backwards if he chose a church rule over the "right" thing to do. He deserved to die and is no martyr.

I think that's about as plain as I can make it. If you don't get that, then you need to get a real church and get saved.

50 posted on 11/30/2007 1:42:40 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
Again, you are speaking from total ignorance. (Any wonder Catholics get tired of this?)

If you had bothered to investigate the facts instead of just picking up ugly gossip by the side of the road, you would know that the homosexual priest problem has been dealt with severely. The Catholic church is the only church that has hired an outside investigative/auditing firm to have absolute transparency on this issue. You may read their detailed report on just about any diocesan website.

A couple of facts to assist you in becoming less fact-free: (1) overwhelmingly the abuse occurred in the 1950s and 60s; (2) the priests who committed it have been removed, imprisoned, or are dead; (3) the bishops who looked the other way have been disciplined and in most cases removed; (4) the vast majority of cases occurred in dioceses where the bishops were rebelling against the discipline of the Church in other ways.

Contrast this with other churches (including my former denomination, the Episcopalians) which happily ordain homosexual ministers and look the other way when they seduce church members. One doesn't hear about these incidents, of course, because it doesn't fit the news media template. It never ceases to astonish me that FR members, who ordinarily are so skeptical of the news media, just swallow this particular trope whole.

51 posted on 11/30/2007 4:26:56 AM PST by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
>>>>>I think that's about as plain as I can make it. If you don't get that, then you need to get a real church and get saved.

The only chuckling I do is at morons like you.

52 posted on 11/30/2007 8:32:52 AM PST by Thorin ("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson