Posted on 11/25/2007 6:23:44 PM PST by NormsRevenge
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Clearly, this is just one more horror that must be Bush’s fault. [/sarcasm]
And... the money quote:
Rich Western nations and the United Nations must act to “make humanitarian aid faster, fairer and more flexible and to improve ways to prepare for and reduce the risk of disasters”
Rich Western nations and the United Nations must act to "make humanitarian aid faster, fairer and more flexible and to improve ways to prepare for and reduce the risk of disasters," it said.
Don't send food - just money. Preferably direct deposited to the Leader's Swiss bank account.
I’m sure there were just as many natural disasters in 1980 as there are now. The difference is that satellite and internet technology developed over the last quarter-century now enables the whole world to get the news about each and every disaster occurring anywhere.
We used to have the occasional flood, now we have disaster declarations when it floods.
We used to have the occasional hurricane, now we have disaster declarations before the hurricane even hits.
We used to have the occasional wildfire, now we have disaster declarations when a wildfire occurs.
We used to have the occasional drought, now we get disaster declarations when one occurs.
We classify everything as a disaster nowadays. Mabe that is why there are more of them.
Why is there a greenhouse left standing?
Well, Oxfam! /roll eyes/ What do you expect from Oxfam? Deep research?
I think you have discovered the real reason for this article.
I believe you are the winner.
Subsidize it, and then be surprised when you get more of it? Oh well, that scam has been very profitable for legions of bureaucrats here in the US, so why not try it worldwide?
Shouldn't that read "The world reported about 120 natural disasters in the early 1980s, which compared with the current reported figure of 500"?
What, exactly, has changed: The climate? Or the reporting?
If there is more floods occuring, then there’s not less fresh water is there? This article is Shullbit!
Charles Mackay anticipated this human-caused global warming delusion in his 1841 classic, “Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds”:
“Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one!” Charles Mackay
When it comes to human nature, not much if anything has changed since 1841.
Why shouldn't it work for the global warming zealots?
By and large, they are all one and the same.
The most obivous question is what is the definition of a "natural disaster"? I am quite comfortable in stating that the definition has become more "liberal" in the vein of the changing definition of obesity. Change the definition and, wala, more "victims"
The number of people affected by extreme natural disasters, meanwhile, has surged by almost 70 percent, from 174 million a year between 1985 to 1994, to 254 million people a year between 1995 to 2004, Oxfam said.
As dominant as Pres. Bush's popular vote was over Kerry, I felt it was insignifigant to state the fact that Pres. Bush won more votes than any presidential candidate in history. Ditto for Kerry. The point is a consideration of proportionality. That is how many eligible voters vs. actual voters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.