Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Stock Market vs Nasdaq 2000
Big Charts ^

Posted on 11/20/2007 10:19:20 PM PST by Professional

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
Striking similarities of the two, especially the double top at the end, action afterwards.
1 posted on 11/20/2007 10:19:21 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Travis McGee; Hydroshock; Moonman62; Always Right; Cicero

ping


2 posted on 11/20/2007 10:25:08 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck; bruinbirdman; steve86; Brilliant

ping


3 posted on 11/20/2007 10:26:48 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Professional
Good post.

Also see:

Buffett, Greenspan Concern May Spell End of China Finance Rally

4 posted on 11/20/2007 10:33:05 PM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Professional

These kinds of charts need to be taken with a carton of salt; I saw similar ones bandied around decades ago which supposedly likened the then-current stock market trend to the run up to the Great Depression.


5 posted on 11/20/2007 10:33:45 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Professional

American consumers cutting back on spending could put a big dent in that graph. But predicting when a bubble will end is sure a lot harder than spotting one.


6 posted on 11/20/2007 10:36:26 PM PST by Pelham ("You Can't Deport Them" the fallback position of the Amnesty Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Professional

meaningless comparisons


7 posted on 11/20/2007 10:37:22 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

That decades-old comparison might yet come true, however.


8 posted on 11/20/2007 10:41:01 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture ™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

We’ll see...

The final up leg on both, very similar. And much like NASDAQ, the Chinese are now desperate to throw water on the boom. Don’t fight the fed? What can double in value in just months, can it not go down in months, say 50%? And the down of 50% really hurts, triggers all sorts of other stuff.

Not too long from here, we’re going to read lots about folks/businesses that cannot pay back these Chinese loans. That will hurt business, r/e, stock market there, and if coupled with a rising currency, you’ll see a pretty severe contraction in their economy.

Or I could be wrong, and the Chinese market, for the next 20 years, will double every 9 months...


9 posted on 11/20/2007 10:41:05 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Professional
"Striking similarities of the two, especially the double top at the end, action afterwards."

Yes. China has to buy oil.
10 posted on 11/20/2007 10:41:36 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell

How is it meaningless? Charts, and I’m not a chartist, do at least tell the psychology of a market. These both are charts of euphoria, exuberance, and are not tied to econ fundamentals.


11 posted on 11/20/2007 10:42:28 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Professional

The volume graph sure is different!!!


12 posted on 11/20/2007 10:43:44 PM PST by SierraWasp (If Dems had brains they'd be Repubs. And when they learned to use 'em, they'd be CONSERVATIVES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell

I don’t know what’s meaningless about it — a topping pattern is a topping pattern. It is not a random pattern with no predictive ability. Can it break out of the topping pattern upwards? Yes, it can, but to follow the pattern of other popping bubbles is a preety sure bet.


13 posted on 11/20/2007 10:45:04 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture ™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Good article, thanks.


14 posted on 11/20/2007 10:45:42 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Professional

Because unlike the U.S. China does not have a free market economy. They’re still a communist country. The market forces are different and their government’s solutions to a crisis are different.


15 posted on 11/20/2007 10:46:07 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Had there been any merit, it would have happened about 1990.


16 posted on 11/20/2007 10:46:30 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

fxi is a us ETF that tracks the chinese index. So the volume comparison is out the window.


17 posted on 11/20/2007 10:46:55 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Sorry about the spelling late this evening.

Also, the increasing volume on the downside is ominous.


18 posted on 11/20/2007 10:46:55 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture ™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I worked at the firm that shall not be named in the early 90’s. They had a very good strategist at the time, forget his name. He said, in 1995, the US market was tracking like the Japanese market did in the 80s. He said we should be bullish, and that it would last for a good while. He was right. That guy was the only honest person at the firm though...


19 posted on 11/20/2007 10:49:36 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Professional

But you have to consider that the etf probably mirrors the internal speculation to a large degree. One should also look at the Shanghai volume, to be sure.


20 posted on 11/20/2007 10:50:02 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture ™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson