Posted on 11/20/2007 10:17:40 AM PST by SmithL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4s0nzsU1Wg Country Boy Can Survive
That won't happen if the Executive is a Democrat, especially if the Executive is Queen Hillary. In that case and if the Congress is controlled by Democrats, full on gun confiscation will commence. They'll be doing it for the children. Every one of us should be at Yellow Alert.
30. This issue must be settled once and for allit has cost the Democratic party too many elections. It is time for it to be removed as a plank of this party's platform and for the party to abandon gun control as a national issue. Leave this issue to the states and bring rural and blue collar Dems back into the party.
Supreme Court to Hear D.C. Gun Ban Case: Will raise political issue in time for '08 election
You cant starve us out and you cant make us run, because one of them ol’ boys will bring his own shotgun!
~~~
Fo’Sho !!,,,TANKS a Bunch Dhue ,,,Saved to my faves,,,
The Enemies Of The Constitution Ain’t Got A SnowBall’s
Chance In Hell !!! .
My pleasure. It is a great song.
He should have held an M 14.
Good, its time to have this out once and for all. Just pray to God to watch over us and our rights...
The SC will not address the issue of the right to carry firearms, openly or concealed, in public. Thus leaving for another day, the issue of how far the 2d Amendment goes.
It is unfortunate that the SC will not settle the whole issue all at one time.
“I read that just the opposite. My translation of the way they are posing the question is: Do ordinary individuals who are not part of the army or national guard have the individual right to bear arms? Which, imo, is the right question. It removes any proficeincy test that well-regulated might impose.”
That’s exactly how I read it.
My pleasure. It is a great song.
~~~
It sure it,,,
JMHO : It won’t be so much a “Gun Grab” as it will be an
“Ammo Squeeze”,,,Time to stock up,,,
Spacetrucker:
You are incorrect. Both Rehnquist and O’Connor were on the USSC at the time, and both ruled in favor of Kelo, and against the omnipotent State. Kennedy betrayed the free Republic on that one, along with the usual suspects.
Also, both joined Thomas in dissenting on medical marijuana, with Kennedy and Scalia joining the anti-life four. I am certain Alito will rule correctly in Parker. I have no idea how Roberts will rule. Kennedy will concur with Roberts, but write a separate opinion joined by no one, if Roberts writes the opinion for five on this one. However, I expect that Alito will write the opinion, with second choice Thomas, and third choice (unlikely, unless the decision is narrow) Kennedy.
The reason Ginsburg and Breyer voted against medical marijuana is that it would imply that states have powers and individuals have rights. And that’s not in their playbook.
Keep
your
powder
dry.
Youre kidding right?
they have already taken up arms against the obvious protections in the Bill of Rights for years.
its up to the supremes to decide if THEY want to officially declare war...
If that happens then theres a bunch a millions of people thatll be without a country, that will start shopping/voting for a new one...
Maybe they got tired of the NRA’s lack of support in their state, or endless compromises or endless mail and boring magazines.
Looks like they've taken the whole enchilada.
If 250 million Americans possessed 1 Billion guns and 50 Billion rounds of ammunition, this could have a small influence on the SCOTUS decision.
this could get ugly, not so much by its immediate implications , but by the precedent it will set
“A Well Educated Society, being necessary for a free state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be infringed”
Simple english. Well educated society isn’t the only ones to keep and read books. The people get to keep and read books so as to have a well educated society.
Only liberals would rape the Constitution to contort the 2nd to mean state milita has ‘the right’. And states don’t have rights, they have ‘powers’ or ‘authority’. ONly people have rights.
The above should be all the argument a true Constitution judge needs.
However, given the McCain-Fiengold ruling and Kelo, I we fear this case.
There! Got muh gun strapped on and ready to read the thread!
I imagine that the nominee would, if even deemed to be slightly receptive to listening to the word "gun" without the presence of an airsick bag, have his nomination dragged out until the oral arguments were heard and he couldn't vote on the case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.