Religious scholars mull Flying Spaghetti Monster

CNN Online ^ | 11/16/07 | Anonymous

[Hunterite]

“So the concept of Freedom of Religion, and the very basis of your argument, is wrong?

What other religions would you ban?

You seem to like to point to the Constitution, which I agree should be adhered to, so how does you idea of banning any religion fit into what this country is supposed to stand for?

You can be all for all the ammendments you like, but thankfully, I doubt you’ll ever see it passed.”

*************************

You are propping up cultural diversity to let the Golden Horde in. Thats what normal people call “traitors.”

You would change your tune in a heartbeat if a nuke killed half a million Americans. 2,000 in one day isn’t enough for you, 500,000 may open your eyes.

And thats right, I said Constitutional Ammendment, don’t forget that.

[Lord_Baltar]

Your Theocratic hyperboli aside, you failed to answer my questions.

I know you said Ammendment, but you, again, in your zeal, neglected to answer which other religions you’d ban within your aforementioned ammendment.

Maybe you were too busy waving around the word Traitor, to notice.

Try again, and get back to me.

[Pietro]

"Which you are using here."

And why not? I'm simply using the time honored tactics of evolutionists whenever someone cites the Discovery Institute or anyone that's even tangentially related to DI. CNN is every bit as agenda driven as DI.

Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

[Hunterite]

“Your Theocratic hyperboli aside, you failed to answer my questions.”

*****************

Alarmists before 9-10-01 were considered hyperbolic too, not parabolic then they’d have TWO vertexeses.

[Lord_Baltar]

OK, so you can’t answer the questions.

That’s OK.

Thanks for playing