Thompson's Abortion Record

National Review On line ^ | 11/15/07 | Ramesh Punnuru

[pissant]

I think it is his obfusaction about his past that will sink him.

[pissant]

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGVhODYzNzZhYjkxYjA4OGRlMjllNDVjNDE1NjFiZjM=

[Reagan Man]

I see you’re still a sour puss spreading sour grapes. LOL Jim told you this was getting old. I agree. If you spent more time posting positive articles about your guy, Duncan Hunter, you might be of some help to his failing campaign effort.

Ramesh Punnuru is entitled to his opinion. He just happens to be dead wrong. Going back to at least 1994, Fred Thompson was never pro-choice. In 1994 and 1996 the NRTL Committe endorsed Fred`s election and reelection to the Senate. Fred had a 100% pro-life voting record while in the Senate. Since at least 1994 Fred has been pro-life.

In 2007 Fred remains pro-life. In 2007 the NRTL has endorsed Fred for President. Doesn’t get any better then that.

Go Fred go!

[Frank L]

The first time I heard about Ron Paul was from a guy on another board who is a real jerk. He starts multiple threads about whatever his pet peeve of the week is, all just a little different. He hollers and fusses if people don’t respond to each and every one of his points but feels free to ignore whatever point his debaters raise against him that he doesn’t like.

[Frank L]

Oh, I left off “Go Fred!”

[pissant]

Yes, but I reckon the national review is pretty safe fodder for FR, don’t you?

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>In 1994, Thompson said in a debate that he was against the government—and not just the federal government—criminalizing abortion.

Hey Ramesh Ponnuru, get you're head out of your butt. The Republican Party Platform opposes criminalizing abortion and throwing women in jail. The GOP Pro-life PLank states:

~~~ We oppose abortion, but our pro-life agenda does not include punitive action against women who have an abortion.

[LibLieSlayer]

Just to show my support for Reagan Man and against the propaganda machine pissant is operating.

LLS

[Frank L]

>The first time I heard about Ron Paul was from a guy on another board who is a real jerk.

I want to make clear that I don’t think you, Pissant, are a jerk, but every other point of comparison matches. Change name of the candidate and voila!

[pissant]

And Ramesh Ponnuru, and Richard Viguerie, and Phyllis Schlafly, and Annie Coulter and Micheal Reagan and and..

[greyfoxx39]

Yes, but I reckon the national review is pretty safe fodder for FR, don’t you?

Fodder? In what way? NR has been pi$$ed ever since the endorsement for Fred came out...and I have been enjoying every moment of their discontent....and yours. GO FRED!

[Squidpup]

PISSANT IS SMOKE! but for how long

[McGruff]

Posted by Jim Robinson to pissant
On Bloggers & Personal ^ 11/13/2007 6:31:11 PM EST · 18 of 49 ^

Best put your efforts into supporting your candidate. Trashing FRed 24/7 will not help you and it’s wearing thin...

[LibLieSlayer]

He has a 100% PRO LIFE VOTING RECORD! Those people you name do not know you... and you do not know them!

LLS

[Squidpup]

ping to the smoking remains of pissant. I watched it live as it happened. Will he rise from the cyber-dead?

[trisham]

It’s too bad, but at the same time..

[Squidpup]

ping to smoldering ruin

[Politicalmom]

DRINK!!

[SaxxonWoods]

I think an interesting poll for FR or a national poll would be the following:

1. Are you:

Pro-life

Pro-choice

2. When you cast a vote in a national election how important is the candidate’s position on abortion?

It is my only deciding factor

It is very important

It is somewhat important

It is not very important

It makes no difference in my voting preference.

---

It would be illuminating to link up the answer to the first qustion with the various answers to the second. Are pro-abortion people more or less likely than pro-life people to make voting decisions based on the abortion question?

[trisham]

Will he rise from the cyber-dead?

************

I hope so. New and improved, of course. :)