 |
 |
Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
Posted on 11/13/2007 3:42:26 PM PST by wagglebee
Pro-Life Ping
About time!!!!
Great News Ping
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Is there any real possibility of this passing? Colorado seems a very unlikely venue.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
There are lots of lefty resort towns in Colorado, but the state is also the home of the Air Force Academy and the Focus on the Family headquarters. So it's a toss-up as to whether it could pass a referendum.
Wow, this is great news.
CO - lots of Evangelicals, lots of Mormons, several large Catholic communities. It has a chance. I would love to see the abortion debate shifted to the 14th Amendment - “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”
|
|
This is Hugh. Really Hugh.
I’m not from CO ,,, My question is why would the state supreme court get involved in the ballot initiative process in the first place ? I can see where they would have a role after a change was enacted in deciding affected statutes and such ... but why do the citizens have to get past them beforehand..
I don’t know.
The link in the article is just a godaddy placeholder..
Personhood, babyhood, human.
Not trying to pick a fight, but an originalist would say this initiative would not *necessarily* bring that into play. According to that legal philosophy, whatever the framers of that amendment meant by "person" is binding in its interpretation. And if they had a specific conception of personhood that did not include the unborn, this initiative wouldn't prevent abortion on 14th Amendment grounds.
On the other hand, they might have had a more "living" interpretation of personhood, leaving it to the people of each time to decide. I doubt that though.
My point is that, even if the initiaitive passes, it's not a slam dunk even by conservative legal philosophies.
Once there were “CO - lots of Evangelicals, lots of Mormons, several large Catholic communities. Now - lots of Californians - probably not happening. The Supremes did not endorse the idea they only said the petition was technically correct. When the citizens last tried to stop special rights for homosexuals, they lost in court. They were represented by once AG Salazar, Now Democratic Senator Salazar.
Their DNA certainly proves that the unborn are human persons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.