Skip to comments.
Report: Washington concerned Israel gearing up to attack Iran
Haaretz ^
| November 8, 2007
| Haaretz Service and News Agencies
Posted on 11/08/2007 6:49:23 AM PST by AU72
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
More dithering from unamed 'nancys' in the State Department and Pentagon.
1
posted on
11/08/2007 6:49:24 AM PST
by
AU72
To: AU72
Translation: “Israel’s coming for you Iran, and we’ll just stand here and act horrified to appease the world and say, “Bad Israel! Bad, bad Israel! (Here’s your treat.)”
2
posted on
11/08/2007 6:54:16 AM PST
by
OB1kNOb
(Support Duncan Hunter for the 2008 GOP presidential nominee. He is THE conservative candidate!!)
To: AU72
You know Imanutjob is just nuts. If he really wanted to achieve nuclear capability he would stop announcing their progress and work silently until it was too late to stop them.
He is intentionally trying to provoke an attack to try and rally the ME into a fight against Israel and the West.
To: AU72
Did those Washington officials explain how Israel could complete a successful attack on Iran without passing though U.S. controlled airspace?
4
posted on
11/08/2007 6:55:24 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
To: OB1kNOb
5
posted on
11/08/2007 6:57:28 AM PST
by
Perdogg
(Elections have consequences.)
To: Resolute Conservative
6
posted on
11/08/2007 6:58:46 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Iran should have ceased to exist 11/5/79, but we had no president then.)
To: AU72
There must be a Deputy Secretary of State Nancy McRetreaty
To: Resolute Conservative
You know Imanutjob is just nuts. If he really wanted to achieve nuclear capability he would stop announcing their progress and work silently until it was too late to stop them.”
He wants Israel and or the U.S. to attack Iran.
8
posted on
11/08/2007 7:01:13 AM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: ASA Vet
I really like your tagline...
10
posted on
11/08/2007 7:05:41 AM PST
by
joe fonebone
(When in danger, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout)
To: AU72
We should be concerned they haven’t done it sooner.
11
posted on
11/08/2007 7:13:26 AM PST
by
wastedyears
(One Marine vs. 550 consultants. Sounds like good odds to me.)
To: F15Eagle
Makes you wonder sometimes if Cuba came out and said they wanted to destroy the USA and then started on a massive campaign to build nukes, all the while stating they wanted to see us destroyed at all costs, what would we do?
Sooner or later there will be an all out war with Islam, it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when. What we do to prepare for that, which in my mind would include making sure Iran does not get nukes by any means possible, is what really matters.
12
posted on
11/08/2007 7:14:43 AM PST
by
Post-Neolithic
(Money only makes Communists rich Communists)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: joe fonebone
I use that one anytime I post the nutjobs photo
14
posted on
11/08/2007 7:39:01 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Iran should have ceased to exist 11/5/79, but we had no president then.)
To: F15Eagle
We lost almost 100,000 KIA in III. It wasn’t cold.
15
posted on
11/08/2007 7:45:32 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Iran should have ceased to exist 11/5/79, but we had no president then.)
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: AU72
Why are we “concerned”. Having Israel do it is a perfect solution to our current political impasse. We outsource everything else, why not this? (we should also hire Israel to build our border fence)
To: AU72
The F-15s being grounded at the moment might just be a slight problem?
18
posted on
11/08/2007 8:04:19 AM PST
by
Tommyjo
To: ASA Vet; gonzo
>>>
Did those Washington officials explain how Israel could complete a successful attack on Iran without passing though U.S. controlled airspace? <<<
I read a report that claimed we shared IFF codes with Israel for their Syrian strike so there would be no interference from US ircraft in the area - flying in Turkey or Iran.
I'm confident that if we are not actively assisting the attack,(perhaps with e'lint and AWACs battle info), we will at least find a way to let Israeli aircraft transit Iraqi airspace.
There will be reprocussions...much Muslim and UN anguish and accusations, but quietly most of the Middle East countries (that count) want to see Iran's wings clipped.
19
posted on
11/08/2007 8:07:14 AM PST
by
HardStarboard
(Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
To: OB1kNOb
20
posted on
11/08/2007 8:07:15 AM PST
by
2001convSVT
("People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson