Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson Rejects GOP's Pro-Life Platform Plank
CNS ^ | 11/5/07 | Terrence Jeffrey

Posted on 11/05/2007 7:42:06 AM PST by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 501-511 next last
To: redgirlinabluestate

Thank you for your intellectual honesty. I hope it spreads.


421 posted on 11/05/2007 12:42:53 PM PST by Texas Federalist (Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

You could, but I would not want to try for a HLA until all 50 states are in the same camp. By then we would have more of an influence on having the legislators we want in place and even that would mean a tough fight with liberal districts.


422 posted on 11/05/2007 12:43:35 PM PST by Pistolshot ("All you anti-Freds remind me of Wile E. Coyote trying to fool the sheepdog." - Josh Painter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB

if a state decided to legalize, say the murder of jews or blacks, you better believe the federal govt will get involved.


423 posted on 11/05/2007 12:45:20 PM PST by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB

That is not a good analogy, IMO.

A better analogy would be if the Supremes ruled that retarded children are not afforded constitutional protections, and that states could not prosecute those who committed the executions of those kids.

How one would respond to that scenario is how we should be responding to this ongoing infantacide called abortion. IOTW, re-establish their constitutional right to life.


424 posted on 11/05/2007 12:47:03 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot

no....you don’t understand. This is not just about changing the constitution. That may not happen for a long long time. But HLA makes the pro-life cause a national campaign. It unites the party. Drop the push for HLA and no president will talk about abortion anymore.


425 posted on 11/05/2007 12:53:16 PM PST by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: pissant
A better analogy would be if the Supremes ruled that retarded children are not afforded constitutional protections, and that states could not prosecute those who committed the executions of those kids.

How one would respond to that scenario is how we should be responding to this ongoing infantacide called abortion. IOTW, re-establish their constitutional right to life.

Yep, this is the analogy that those who advocate a "federalist" approach to abortion must wrestle with in order to be intellectually consistent.

426 posted on 11/05/2007 12:53:45 PM PST by Oliver Optic (Never blame on strategery that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"Why is it “big government” to forward constitutional protections to the unborn? Are they human beings or not?"

My thoughts exactly... abortion is not a "State Rights" and/or Federalism issue. It's a matter of life or death and whether or not baby humans have a right to live. "Let the States decide" isn't going to work in the case of abortion. Nor should it.

-jw

427 posted on 11/05/2007 12:56:55 PM PST by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic

I know. But they put up smoke screens. If all of the GOP would unite and show the appropriate amount of outrage regarding the snuffing of the unborn, an Amendment would pass easily. Alas, too many are happy being ‘nuanced’ about the issue. Blech!


428 posted on 11/05/2007 12:56:59 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: JWinNC

Amen.


429 posted on 11/05/2007 12:57:24 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
I do understand, but I am a realist on what can and cannot be accomplished.

To accomplish a HLA you need a majority of the House(not likely because of the liberal districts), a majority of the Senate(even more difficult because of the liberal states that elect the bafoons), then a ratification from the states and that will bring even more contention to the issue and is no guarantee unless you have the groundswell in place beforehand.

Keeping it in front of the Congress only makes it dismissive by them.

430 posted on 11/05/2007 12:59:46 PM PST by Pistolshot ("All you anti-Freds remind me of Wile E. Coyote trying to fool the sheepdog." - Josh Painter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
I understand the confusion. To me it is a warning that we could go too far in the attempt to eliminate abortion. What is the punishment? What are the limits? When would you allow abortion to be viable?

Thanks ... at least you gave a resaonable response. No other Thompson defenders on this thread seem to want to touch Fred's statement at all.

Frankly, it scares me. It's not the kind of language that genuine pro-lifers are in the custom of using ... "criminalizing young girls" ... "their family doctor" (how many abortions are comitted by "family doctors"?).

Hopefully he will clarify ... but for now his claim to be "pro-life" is suspect to me.

431 posted on 11/05/2007 1:02:24 PM PST by Oliver Optic (Never blame on strategery that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
What Fred said amounts to this: "I'm personally opposed to abortion but if you want one I won't impose my opinion on you"

Sorry Fred that's called being Pro-Choice on Abortion.

Fred wants to end Roe and leave abortion up to the "Choice" of the States.

While that is an improvement over today's situation it's his end goal and to me that's pathetic.

Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

432 posted on 11/05/2007 1:04:52 PM PST by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildcatClan

I do not disagree with anything in your post. I wish that our Founders had seen a bit into the future... for a lot of reasons... abortion being number one. Like you said, they would have a fit if they knew where liberalism has taken America today.

LLS


433 posted on 11/05/2007 1:17:43 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

No reason to blaspheme. Our Founders were touched by GOD himself... do you dispute that fact?

LLS


434 posted on 11/05/2007 1:19:26 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: pissant

**Well, that helps explain why he thinks the GOP platform is “the most useless device” he’s ever heard of.
**


U.S. Sen. Fred Thompson says he seldom hears about abortion in campaign travels throughout Tennessee and hopes the issue is downplayed at the Republican National Convention. The Tennessee Republican, a pro-choice defender in a party with an anti-abortion tilt, is preparing for next week’s convention in San Diego. He said the party must avoid distracting issues and focus on electing Bob Dole as president. “We need to concentrate on what brings us together and not what divides us,” Thompson said in an interview with The Tennessean published Tuesday. Thompson said he opposes making early-term abortions a crime, as some Republicans would like to do with a constitutional amendment. “But I don’t think you should bolt on one issue. I’m still not convinced platforms are a good idea. We know what we believe in and I don’t think we need to write it all down in a document,” Thompson said. (AP, 8/6/96)

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/03/12/87865.aspx


435 posted on 11/05/2007 1:22:25 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah (Romney Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
That is not a good analogy, IMO.

First let me state that I do not believe in abortion for any reason. If the child is the product of a rape or incest and you abort it, you've executed the wrong individual.

If the claim is that it hazards the life of the mother, my contention is that the mother's life is not more valuable than the childs...let God decide. The notion that the child endangers the life (or even more feebly the health) of the mother is a straw dog. With modern medicine that's almost an impossible notion.

All of that said, I think that we should be consistant with the application of our laws. I would have no objection to making regular murders a Federal crime (as a matter of fact, that could be an easy way to restore the death penalty here in West Virginia), but whichever way we go we should be consistant.

436 posted on 11/05/2007 1:23:01 PM PST by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot

we have accomplished...the GOP is a pro-life party on a national level because of HLA and other federal pro-life measures that congress can vote for and presidents can advocate for.
This was not the case before Reagan...before the issue was nationalized.


437 posted on 11/05/2007 1:25:50 PM PST by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

please explain what you mean by that


438 posted on 11/05/2007 1:31:57 PM PST by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC

Yes, but the pro life plank is important.


439 posted on 11/05/2007 1:37:32 PM PST by juliej (Vote GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: ssaftler

I am not voting third party. Have no fear - however, the pro life plank is important. And no, there is no circumstance under which I could ever, ever vote for a Clinton.


440 posted on 11/05/2007 1:38:51 PM PST by juliej (Vote GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 501-511 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson