Since you liked that so much, you can WATCH IT...
Posted on 11/03/2007 10:48:18 AM PDT by vietvet67
What a dope he is.
That doesn’t look like his signature from the past. Perhaps Nurse Ratchet was cutting off his oxygen supply right before heart surgery to make him sign it. She knew back then that she would be running.
Hey Slick, there’s no such thing as a stupid question; only a stupid answer!
Bubba is trying to run a mis-direction play. Hillary’s big gaffe was about illegals getting driver’s licenses, not the release of papers. However, she did bomb when Russert asked her about the release of Bubba’s papers. I think Bubba was trying to focus the MSM’s attention away from Hillary’s views on drivers licenses for illegals.
he’s got charisma, she was The Cleaner. now they’re in some weird role reversal, cept she aint got charisma. lol
That's what HE thought...because he is guilty of what he thought was implied.
why can’t the Clintons just admit they both have serious character flaws and go to China and get that surgery for mental illness?
Since you liked that so much, you can WATCH IT...
Misleading? [Stephen Spruiell]
Bill Clinton says that one of the questions Tim Russert asked Hillary at Tuesday night's debate was "breathtakingly misleading." Let's take a look at the question:
RUSSERT: Senator Clinton, I’d like to follow up, because in terms of your experience as first lady, in order to give the American people an opportunity to make a judgment about your experience, would you allow the National Archives to release the documents about your communications with the president, the advice you gave? Because, as you well know, President Clinton has asked the National Archives not to do anything until 2012.
And the follow-up:
RUSSERT: But there was a letter written by President Clinton specifically asking that any communication between you and the president not be made available to the public until 2012. Would you lift that ban?
[The entire exchange is here.]
Clinton says the question was misleading because, "She was incidental to the letter, it was done five years ago, it was a letter to speed up presidential releases, not to slow them down."
True, the letter (which you can read here) did urge the National Archives to speed up the release of some records from the Clinton administration, with several key exemptions that Clinton listed in the letter. Among them:
... communications directly between the President and the First Lady, and their families, unless routine in nature...
That's exactly the passage Russert asked about, almost word for word. How is that misleading?
It's a fair cop, Bill. Get over it. You're busted.
I never listen to him, but had picked up the impression from comments here that he was a pretty steady diet of Bush-bashing.
Remember how Bill Clinton lashed out at Chris Wallace in an interview some time back? The Clintons' strategy may be to make so much of a fuss over Russert's questioning that he and the remainder of the media will be afraid to ask any embarrassing questions from now on.
Of course the media will be on Hillary's side if she is the nominee, but obviously many of them would prefer a different Democrat to win the nomination, so they have to be brought in line.
Not when it comes to presidential records.
You and your #1 intern are breathtakingly corrupt, Slick.
Clinton’s letter is to the National Archives.
Hillary steps in it so they send Bill out to try to rehabilitate her. And we’re supposed to believe a woman who needs her husband to run interference for her is ready to be POTUS?
Many teachers would disagree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.