Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shocking Inside DC Scandal Rumor: A Media Ethics Dilemma
Ron Rosenbaum.com ^ | 10/29/07 | Ron Rosenbaum

Posted on 10/30/2007 6:09:13 PM PDT by jimboster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-426 next last
To: jimboster

I say Edwards — and that means they were scooped by the Enquirer.


21 posted on 10/30/2007 6:16:06 PM PDT by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimboster

“I’m betting it’s Obama”

It’s gotta be. They wouldn’t dare sink the H-beast.


22 posted on 10/30/2007 6:16:08 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimboster

I feel that it is something regarding Obama. He and his campaign don’t seem to be acting the same, as of late.

I was guessing he had been threatened by Hillary. Still could be the case. this thing being whispered about — could be something planted by Hillary, to silence Obama.


23 posted on 10/30/2007 6:16:25 PM PDT by i_dont_chat (Your choice if you take offense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimboster

You can safely bet that it’s not a Republican. They would never sit on a story involving a Republican candidate.


24 posted on 10/30/2007 6:16:41 PM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimboster
Since the LA Times is actually debating whether to release the story or not, I'm betting it's Obama

If it is Hillary's camp gave them the info
25 posted on 10/30/2007 6:16:48 PM PDT by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimboster

They’re probably waiting to spring it at the “right” moment, which means the moment it will have maximum impact. It doesn’t have to be a fresh story, either. Hmmmm, I wonder who and what the rumor is about. Could be Obama. LOL, what if it’s HILLARY? But seriously, if this is about some old, 10-20 year old affair that the spouse already knows about and has dealt with it and moved on, and nothing has happened since, then I don’t think it’s relevant to an election, except to embarrass a candidate.


26 posted on 10/30/2007 6:17:16 PM PDT by wimpycat (Hyperbole is the opiate of the activist wacko.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimboster

Wow... I should have read more closely.


27 posted on 10/30/2007 6:18:19 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jimboster

Link

28 posted on 10/30/2007 6:18:45 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimboster

Has to be a Democrap. If it was a Republican, it would be front page news all across the country.


29 posted on 10/30/2007 6:18:57 PM PDT by Ronin (Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russ

Not necessarily. They would sit on a story about a Republican and spring it on the public at an opportune moment if that meant tipping the balance of an election, you can bet your sweet patootie on that.


30 posted on 10/30/2007 6:19:16 PM PDT by wimpycat (Hyperbole is the opiate of the activist wacko.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jimboster

Not necessarily a story about a ‘rat, the liberals love to time the release of things damaging to the Republicans for maximum effect.


31 posted on 10/30/2007 6:19:22 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimboster
Given the hinting Rosenbaum does, there are only three serious possibilities:

1) A documented, verifiable lesbian relationship on Hillary's part; or

2) A documented, verifiable extramarital affair between Obama and a white woman,

3) A documented verifiable homosexual relationship on Obama's part .

Nothing other than those things would potentially be derailing to either campaign: given Bill's catting around, most people would (I think and I can't stand her) not hold a heterosexual affair against Hillary, and, even though Obama is seen as something of a 'mr. clean' his having an affair would not be disqualifying unless there were more to it, such as it being inter-racial or homosexual.

32 posted on 10/30/2007 6:19:38 PM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
Did John Edwards Sleep With This Lady?

If it is Edwards, BFD. He isn't a serious candidate even if Hillary and Obama drop dead.

33 posted on 10/30/2007 6:19:46 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
From the article: "By the way, it’s not the Edwards rumor, it’s something else.
34 posted on 10/30/2007 6:19:47 PM PDT by AZLiberty (President Fred -- I like the sound of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
Anyone hear anything yet? I looked around, not a single thing...like to post it on my site if I do find out. But then, I have to know for sure that it is true.

Gary

WatchingHillary.com


35 posted on 10/30/2007 6:20:07 PM PDT by GaryLee1990 (www.WatchingHillary.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

He already said it wasn’t about Edwards.


36 posted on 10/30/2007 6:20:14 PM PDT by wimpycat (Hyperbole is the opiate of the activist wacko.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kalee

My thoughts exactly.


37 posted on 10/30/2007 6:21:43 PM PDT by ghostrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jimboster
Obama seems a reasonable guess.

Might as well have some race questions mixed in with the sex and politics "dillemma".

38 posted on 10/30/2007 6:22:27 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

You mean our media doesn’t impartially deliver the news to the people, but is of such a united mind that it will withhold or censor news according to its agenda?

Nah, now why would I think that?


39 posted on 10/30/2007 6:22:34 PM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat

You reading my mind? Beat me by seconds!


40 posted on 10/30/2007 6:23:04 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-426 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson