Posted on 10/30/2007 6:09:13 PM PDT by jimboster
The media has no ethics.
Ubama is a lesbian?!
Who knew. ;-)
From Kausfiles:
http://www.slate.com/id/2176954/#darkstar
A Dark Unseen Scandal Star?
Plus—kf gets bitchy.
By Mickey Kaus
Updated Tuesday, Oct. 30, 2007, at 6:33 PM ET
Do you sense there is some large mass of dark matter, an unseen Scandal Star, the gravitational pull of which is warping the coverage of what seems, on the surface, a pretty dull presidential race? I do. So does Ron Rosenbaum. I thought the Dark Star was the Edwards affair allegation. But Rosenbaum says “everyone in the elite Mainstream media” knows about another juicy scandal that the LAT is supposedly sitting on. I guess this is proof that I’m not in the elite, because I don’t know what he’s talking about. ... My vestigial Limbaugh gland tells me it must involve a Democrat, or else the Times would have found a reason to print it. ... P.S.: If it’s just Richardson, that will be very disappointing. ... 3:16 P.M. link
That's impossible. You can't have an ethics dilemma if you don't have any ethics.
Ron Rosenbaum: What a weenie. A weenie writing about other weenies.
Gary
I hate cryptic rumors!
juicy juicy
Ha! No kiddin’!
But how does that square with the "this hasn't been out there in this specific form before" statement?
Rumors of Hillary's SSAD have been around for years.
I’ve mentioned before that in 2000, the Gore campaign was begging the MSM to print an outrageous scandal (and I think libel)about George Bush. This was just before they got the DUI story published, but that was not it. As we know, the DUI story was true. I’m sure the “story” I know about was not true. So when I see an article like this one, I’m not certain it’s about a democrat. That would be my first guess, but I know it is possible for the MSM to sit on an anti republican scandal, possibly because they can’t prove it and don’t want to get burned, as later happened to Dan Rather. There are tons of “scandals” floating around about everybody all the time, but I think the MSM does filter the ones that have no facts backing them up, even against republicans. Now for democrats, they will sit on them even with facts, of course.
“Or is this a trick question?”
I think it’s an analogy. Think of the money as a story, and the partnership as being a media-democrat party one.
psssst
this just got tons more attention, was posted here
(scroll down to forums)
Clarification please?
It can’t be Obama. Joe Biden has vouched that Obama is , “..articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. “
There you go!
“Dark Star”??
Ubama is dark. (But clean!)
Ubama is a star. OMG.
UBAMA IS DARK STAR. News at eleven!
It can’t be a Democrat. It’s impossible to shame one.
My guess is that it’s about Rudy and the media is holding onto it because they want him to be their trojan horse then pull the surprise once he has the nomination wrapped up.
Remember, liberal have an incredible capacity to deceive themselves.
really great post CondorFlight , .. .. I love brevity , and Truth
{ {{ I’m scouring the horizon for Our Generation’s WILL RODGERS }} }
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.