Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taxing Ourselves to Death[Ron Paul]
House.gov ^ | 14 Oct 2007 | Ron Paul

Posted on 10/20/2007 11:41:41 AM PDT by BGHater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 10/20/2007 11:41:42 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater
186 Republicans and 10 Democrats voted with me last week to kill the Death Tax. It is my hope that we will get another chance in the future to end this punitive and un-American tax for good.

Restoring American liberty by abolishing one tax at a time.

2 posted on 10/20/2007 11:43:46 AM PDT by Old 300 (Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few capitalists. --GK Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

Ping.


3 posted on 10/20/2007 11:54:47 AM PDT by 383rr (Those who choose security over liberty deserve neither- GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old 300

Too bad more people don’t understand that our entire system is based on REAL private property rights and that if the government can confiscate your property if you don’t cough up your property ‘taxes’, then you don’t REALLY own it after all.


4 posted on 10/20/2007 12:00:13 PM PDT by goin.too.fast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old 300
Old but tested and true...

"No nation ever taxed itself into prosperity..."

5 posted on 10/20/2007 12:02:49 PM PDT by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goin.too.fast
if the government can confiscate your property if you don’t cough up your property ‘taxes’, then you don’t REALLY own it after all.

bttt, FRiend.

6 posted on 10/20/2007 12:08:31 PM PDT by Old 300 (A telling signal that a country is taxing itself to death is capital flight and expatriation. --RP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
When he is sane, is is very good. Too bad the few minutes of sanity come wrapped in months and months of insanity.

We elect a President to do a whole lot more then speak nice sounding rhetoric.

7 posted on 10/20/2007 12:29:22 PM PDT by MNJohnnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goin.too.fast

The dims have started a war on private property. I am not sure that you own anything in the current climate. Private property rights are the foundation of our republic. Without private property rights, nothing else matters.


8 posted on 10/20/2007 12:32:27 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

We have been collectivized. The question is, are we willing to do something about it? No one else but Presidential candidate Ron Paul is talking about it at all. It must be embarrassing for conservatives to support the other candidates.


9 posted on 10/20/2007 12:35:10 PM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BGHater; NapkinUser; DreamsofPolycarp; The_Eaglet; Irontank; Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; ...

Ron Paul campaign website

Ron's weekly message [5 minutes audio, every Monday]
PodcastWeekly archive • Toll-free 888-322-1414 •
Free Republic Ron Paul Ping List: Join/Leave

10 posted on 10/20/2007 1:23:41 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old 300
we are making strides towards destroying prosperity but expanding the welfare state. This is a dangerous and untenable trend.

Try telling 'conservatives' that.

11 posted on 10/20/2007 1:28:16 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old 300; businessprofessor; goin.too.fast; MNJohnnie
Thanks for those comments.

I only wish we could do much more to get all our GOP candidates to take this stance to protect private property. I don't expect everyone to support Dr. Paul but he really is 1000% right on this issue and it is a longstanding core policy of our party.

I hope he brings it up in the next debate somehow. The other candidates are being allowed to slip by answering some of these things. We should expect all of them to commit to something very similar to this position if they want our votes.
12 posted on 10/20/2007 1:29:04 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

I’ve heard enough from the other candidates to know that they’re really not serious about the Bill of Rights or restoring sound monetary policy. I don’t have any hopes that they’ll get on the truly conservative bandwagon. If they surprise me with what they say, none of them has a 30 year public history of sticking to these points without wavering.


13 posted on 10/20/2007 1:30:49 PM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
PAUL'S A KOOK! TERRORISTS WILL HAVE MORE DISPOSABLE INCOME TO STAGE ATTACKS AND USE TAX CREDITS TO BUY ARMS!
14 posted on 10/20/2007 1:34:29 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("Just 3 hours a day with Rudy Guiliani is all I ask" -- Sean Hannity is on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
we are making strides towards destroying prosperity but expanding the welfare state. This is a dangerous and untenable trend.

Try telling 'conservatives' about that? Those Rockefeller-wing candidates are clearly not as conservative as Ron Paul. Even the independent Republicans like Tancredo and Hunter aren't talking about abolishing the Federal Reserve.

Ron Paul is a superstar in conservative monetary circles, and the other candidates are either unwilling to step up and admit that fiat currency is our main problem, or they don't understand it.

I'm proud to support a candidate who can debate Federal Reserve governors on these subjects.

15 posted on 10/20/2007 1:34:33 PM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
The other candidates are being allowed to slip by answering some of these things.

Some? Watching the debates I am reminded of the somewhat infamous Family Guy episode where one of the characters is running for office. She's told if she wants to win just keep saying 9/11. Now while that phrase has been copyrighted to Rudy apparently the other candidates hardly mention the economy or taxes it seems. If they do, they somehow try to tie it to our ongoing 'struggle'. They're pandering to social conservatives knowing full well half that stuff couldn't get through Congress (rightly so) and the warhawks.

Private property and excessive taxation? Dr. Paul is the only one that has hit the nail on the head and repeatedly continues to do so. To expect the other Republican candidates to do the same would require a miracle

16 posted on 10/20/2007 1:34:53 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
We elect a President to do a whole lot more then speak nice sounding rhetoric.

Brush up on your civics Johnnie. Legislation comes from Congress, the President's job is to set the agenda by using the bully pulpit, something that your buddy Bush hasn't done.

17 posted on 10/20/2007 1:37:15 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("Just 3 hours a day with Rudy Guiliani is all I ask" -- Sean Hannity is on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: billbears
When Ron Paul points out that the second amendment would have helped us on 9/11 if we had a constitutional republic, it's thrilling to my ears. Anyone who thinks he's weak should pay more attention. He talks softly and he talks firmly. But his words are extremely powerful. Restore the constitution and many of our worst problems will vanish. The problem is in daring to do that.

The alternative to restoring the constitution is unthinkable to me.

18 posted on 10/20/2007 1:37:24 PM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Old 300
who can debate Federal Reserve governors on these subjects

Heh, I used to look forward to Greenspan appearing in front of Dr. Paul. You knew in between the politicians asking Greenspan about nothing in general, Greenspan had to actually prepare for questions from Dr. Paul

19 posted on 10/20/2007 1:38:19 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: billbears

And now Greenspan is starting to sound like Dr. No himself!


20 posted on 10/20/2007 1:40:19 PM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson