"The process of creating a 90-minute documentary from the original peer-reviewed science for an audience of moviegoers in the U.S. and around the world is complex. Vice President Gore has studied this issue for over 30 years. He regularly seeks the advice and feedback of scientists to understand the latest research. It's not easy, even for Ph.D.'s, to explain the concept of the "non-linearity" of the climate system even after decades in their respective fields. Imagine trying to translate that complicated scientific evidence into a clear and compelling message with only a single slide and 20 seconds to make your case. It isn't simple. In many cases, particular points had to be truncated and shortened from the original research. A movie inherently cannot reflect the depth of the science as the 3 volumes of the IPCC and other sources from which it draws. The original science cannot speak to moviegoers. And, as is not made clear by the Fact Checker, the judge stated clearly that he was not attempting to perform "an analysis of the scientific questions" in his ruling."
1 posted on
10/19/2007 9:34:47 AM PDT by
cogitator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-22 last
To: cogitator
To: cogitator
38 posted on
10/20/2007 11:57:04 AM PDT by
Dad yer funny
(FoxNews is morphing , and not for the better ,... internal struggle? Its hard to watch)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-22 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson