Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dollar dives as US slump spreads
The Telegraph ^ | 10/19/07 | Ambrose Evans-Pritchard and Joe Moulds

Posted on 10/18/2007 6:07:42 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221 next last
To: Freedom4US

China manipulates their currency, so it doesn’t increase in value. THe South American countries did the same, to guard against the opposite, a falling value. For latin america it was an incredible success, until it got out of hand, and exploited by the likes of Soros and similar. Mexico got hammered in that, and they had to devalue their currency significantly. At least in Latin America, the loans yes, were paid back with much cheaper money. In china, they will have to pay back loans that explode to the upside in price, as soon as this scheme fails. The repurcussions from this will be talked about for a very, long, time...


181 posted on 10/20/2007 10:03:39 PM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Freedom4US

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRzr1QU6K1o

Above is video of Richard Nixon when he slammed shut the gold window. Listen to the weasel words

Please note I’m not a Nixon hater


182 posted on 10/20/2007 11:11:12 PM PDT by dennisw (France needs a new kind of immigrant — one who is "selected, not endured" - Nicholas Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Freedom4US; Professional

Yeah old man Bush and Mulroney (former Canada PM) made big money with Barrick. My guess is they still own Barrick

The whole point being that “free traitors” advocate trade policies that leave us with outlandish trade deficits that bring the inevitable dollar crashes. But same “free traitors” hedge themselves against dollar crashes with gold. That primitive barbaric relic

George Bush (#41) understands the visceral attraction of gold unlike say, uh, “professional”


183 posted on 10/20/2007 11:19:47 PM PDT by dennisw (France needs a new kind of immigrant — one who is "selected, not endured" - Nicholas Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

John Maynard Keynes denounced gold as a “barbaric relic”


184 posted on 10/20/2007 11:23:09 PM PDT by dennisw (France needs a new kind of immigrant — one who is "selected, not endured" - Nicholas Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Globalism, that's the ticket.........

'Ain't it great?

It's good for everyone.............except America..........

185 posted on 10/20/2007 11:28:27 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (Some elected people are alive only because it's illegal to kill them!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Yup, Gold Fever...

I’ve admitted that gold has merit, the ultimate way to protect your money. But it doesn’t grow.

You could also say that you are protecting your money when you buy a stock. You give money, buy stock, the stock might be valued in dollars, but the stock is based in value by the profit it makes. And usually, if the currency is lower, they make more money, making the stock......go up.

So, both protect from a declining currency, but with the stock you also have the byproduct, of profit. Or at least the potential for it.


186 posted on 10/20/2007 11:47:36 PM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Professional

Get a 10 year chart and you’ll find gold has been “growing” ever since 9 11 2001


187 posted on 10/20/2007 11:53:37 PM PDT by dennisw (France needs a new kind of immigrant — one who is "selected, not endured" - Nicholas Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Sure, I’d love to go back in time buying it, and throw in some oil stocks too, but that isn’t how it works. Both oil and gold have history of making very big moves, but then can do absolutely nothing for a long time too. If you rode the big move, good for you, nice call. Price appreciation though, not exactly growth, because it didn’t make anything, there is nothing being spun off from the big vault of gold someone owns. If you owned a stock, you’d get dividends, cd you’d get interest, real estate you’d get rent, etc.. Gold, like other physical items simply increases from the inflation or currecny adjustment. Ok, I’ll admit that an increase in say commercial need can add to that? Again, good call, nice to make money, don’t want to make you or anyone else here all mad and threaten to contact the “cops” on me, like the golf cheater said he’d do...


188 posted on 10/21/2007 12:02:28 AM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

I’m not great with HTML. Care to put a chart up?


189 posted on 10/21/2007 12:03:43 AM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Professional

Point being gold is up since 9 11 2001
Same for oil

190 posted on 10/21/2007 12:09:58 AM PDT by dennisw (France needs a new kind of immigrant — one who is "selected, not endured" - Nicholas Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

If you can, show a chart of the Nasdaq from Jan 1999 to Jan 2001. The upchart here, looks virtually identical.

I pulled it up, but could not find a way to cut and paste it.

I’m not a chartist, but do follow it a wee bit. Comparing the two, you see the same volatility, then the major upspike, a correction that rallies harder....

Again, not to argue or make anyone mad, just find it interesting. I certainly don’t need any FR Gestapo agents to call my employer or anything...


191 posted on 10/21/2007 12:31:15 AM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Professional

Again, not to argue or make anyone mad, just find it interesting. I certainly don’t need any FR Gestapo agents to call my employer or anything...
_____

Hahha
You’re OK
Just naive about gold but so what


192 posted on 10/21/2007 12:35:49 AM PDT by dennisw (France needs a new kind of immigrant — one who is "selected, not endured" - Nicholas Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Professional
"I’ve admitted that gold has merit, the ultimate way to protect your money. But it doesn’t grow.

But there are a bunch of assumptions here, one being that "money" is necessarily something other than gold? Or maybe you meant "wealth"?

If it's not "money", why do bankers have (most?) of it accumulated by the ton, buried underground in vaults? Pretty strange, wouldn't you agree? Dig it up, melt it down into bars, bury it again.

The only reason it doesn't "grow" is because the government made it illegal for Americans to hold for decades, forbade contracts payable in gold (reneging on contract law?) and the US congress to declare in so many words, that using gold coins was "against public policy" - and accused the American people of "hoarding" gold. (But the supposed 8 thousand tons at Fort Knox, that's not "hoarding"??).

With all that, I agree there isn't near enough of it to have a functioning economy. But monetary inflation robs people - good, honest, hard-working people - (lets not worry about crooks and thieves here, they seem to be getting along fine) of their savings and is ultimately a broken promise - or a default on a contract if you will.

What is the benefit of differently valued and fluctuating currencies to the great masses of people who don't sit in front of a computer moniter tracking stocks and markets, who are only trying to get through the day? How do you propose that the average person (who may be more concerned with the return OF their money rather than the return ON their money) protect themselves? My answer would be "With a 12 Gauge"; but this same government has historically tried to deny them the right of self-defense. (I'm not paranoid, just paying attention)
193 posted on 10/21/2007 4:56:16 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Professional; dennisw
I’m oblivious for not getting the “zing”? With all due respect, doesn’t your explanation make my point? Gold is just an object. Yes, it is pretty, and also makes people kind of crazy. An ounce of gold generally just maintains purchasing power. But hey, I’ll admit, that for a portion of someone’s entire net worth, that is necessary/or one way of doing it?

I'll grant that you are (by your own account) a Financial Super Genius. That you have an extreme knack over the past decade or two of putting more and more digits into the electronic ledgers.

I would only humbly suggest that you study history a bit more broadly than the past decade or two, and gold's lasting value as a store of wealth may be revealed to you.

Say, 6,000 unbroken years of human history, as opposed to a couple of decades.

(Hint: There is a reason why Germany doesn't use the Weimar D-mark any more.)

Need more? How about former Fed chairman Paul Volcker? About two years abo he said that there is a 75 percent chance of a dollar crash within the next five years. (Three years to go by my crude math.)

Now, I realize that you are a lot smarter than Paul Volcker, but maybe he's not a complete moron like the rest of us non-Financial Super Geniuses here.

194 posted on 10/21/2007 6:02:15 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Professional
You could also say that you are protecting your money when you buy a stock. You give money, buy stock, the stock might be valued in dollars, but the stock is based in value by the profit it makes. And usually, if the currency is lower, they make more money, making the stock......go up. So, both protect from a declining currency, but with the stock you also have the byproduct, of profit. Or at least the potential for it.

During steady economic times, yes. During crisis times, no. Many folks over the age of 75 have folders full of stock certs that are worth exactly the paper they are printed on, plus the ink. Their paper assets went to zero.

You may believe (based on your life experience) that stocks are literally better than gold, but don't bet on them holding their value (much less increasing) across a period of economic turmoil and dislocation. You may wind up with a stack of "Confederate War Bonds," as has happened time and again over history. (Or in the modern era, a series of zeros on your computer.)

Now, that might be beyond your experience horizon I'll grant you. You do need to read history to discover this.

Are we entering such a time? Paul Volcker is one of those you may have heard of who says yes.

Of course, you are free to just laugh it up. That is your right.

PM from Professional to Travis, yesterday.

Re: Dollar dives as US slump spreads

From Professional | 10/19/2007 8:47:34 PM PDT read

Financial genius? Wouldn’t that be you, mr. “thousand dollar gold next year” prognosticator? You’re just mad, cuz you’re a gold bug, and think that this “object” is your savior. You know, thousands of years ago people knelt for gold. Know where it got them? Let me guess, at one time, you were in the financial biz, couldn’t hack it, got fired, been pissy ever since? Go back to your bomb shelter, get your Ron Paul poster, and go to bed with it you crazy gold bug. He he he, loser.

195 posted on 10/21/2007 6:13:17 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US; Professional
If it's not "money", why do bankers have (most?) of it accumulated by the ton, buried underground in vaults?

Great question! According to Professional, gold has no more inherent value than gravel, other than being more compact.

196 posted on 10/21/2007 6:17:39 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Professional

You truly believe that gold is in the position that the nas was before it’s recent dumper? LOL, you are a riot.


197 posted on 10/21/2007 6:18:58 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
inflation in the States is negligible.

incorrect. inflation in the States as selectively reported by the economic overlords who use the figures to keep wages low is negligible.

there is a *HUGE* disconnect between what the real inflation rate is and what is reported -- I've seen some estimates that the real rate of inflation is more like two or three times the reported CPI of 2.8%

198 posted on 10/21/2007 6:22:32 AM PDT by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Professional
The Japanese, if what you say is true, should have turned out very well after the late 80’s.

actually, it *did* turn out "very well" for some of the Japanese after the late 80's - the economic overlords in Japan were able to create a form of economic/consumer slavery which has keep wages there completely stable - the apparent continuous recession they have been in since the 1980's is just the way the Japanese financial/industrial masters want it - Japanese companies are *very* profitable. while there is a nearly 0% interest rate in Japan (!) just try to get a loan in Japan if you are a regular Japanese consumer/citizen... its very difficult.

Japan has morphed into a modern consumer slave state, and the US is headed in that direction and already has picked up some of the same characteristics - check US wage growth over the last 20 years for example...

199 posted on 10/21/2007 6:34:27 AM PDT by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Ok Travis, think you can ease up a bit fella.

From looking at your posts, thinking it over, I certainly see where you guys are coming for. If you know want to beat me bloody into submission, then I’m going to have to get a helmet.

Obviously, the price of gold over the last couple years cannot just be argued away for the sake of the USD. Someone else is buying it, and I’d guess that they have a number of reasons. Many emerging nations are running huge surplusses, wonder if that has anything to do with it?


200 posted on 10/21/2007 9:05:18 AM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson