Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hume, Father of Postmodernism and Anti-rationalism—Part 1
The Autonomist ^ | 10/10/07 | Reginald Firehammer

Posted on 10/10/2007 8:12:38 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

1 posted on 10/10/2007 8:12:49 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fzob; P.O.E.; PeterPrinciple; reflecting; DannyTN; FourtySeven; x; dyed_in_the_wool; Zon; ...
PHILOSOPHY PING

(If you want on or off this list please freepmail me.)

Hank

2 posted on 10/10/2007 8:14:08 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

Why not go back to Bishop Berkley?


3 posted on 10/10/2007 8:18:06 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

Firehammer? I want a cool last name like that.


4 posted on 10/10/2007 8:24:38 AM PDT by wastedyears (George Orwell was a clairvoyant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

Ping for later


5 posted on 10/10/2007 8:26:06 AM PDT by lafroste (gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

There’s only one problem; rationalism underpins atheism, and therefor enables socialism, communism, and things like death camps and medical experiments on humans like the Nazis.

The only savings of the human race is the Judeo-Christian ethic.


6 posted on 10/10/2007 8:34:56 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
"Firehammer? I want a cool last name like that."

Well, as long as we are talking philosophy, lemme throw at you -- Ludwig Feurerbach....

7 posted on 10/10/2007 8:35:40 AM PDT by litehaus (A memory tooooo long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

ping


8 posted on 10/10/2007 8:36:35 AM PDT by joeystoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Thought you might like this.


9 posted on 10/10/2007 8:36:51 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

While both Berkeley and Hume are today wrongly classified at empericists (they were in fact idealists), Hume’s “philosophy” is much more rich in the bad ideas that would effect the future of philosophy. The positivists, for example, were strongly influenced by Hume, but mostly dismissed Berkeley, I think.

Regi


10 posted on 10/10/2007 8:37:11 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

Great post. thanks


11 posted on 10/10/2007 8:37:13 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

Great post. thanks


12 posted on 10/10/2007 8:37:17 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litehaus

Lol


13 posted on 10/10/2007 8:37:32 AM PDT by wastedyears (George Orwell was a clairvoyant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

bump for later read


14 posted on 10/10/2007 8:39:36 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
Richard Gere said that Bishop Berkley was his favorite philosopher. So you have Hume-> Positivists vs. Berkley-> Gere.

But seriously though Berkley was the first philosopher to make the claim that language can be used fora variety of things besides describing things. He was extremely important.
15 posted on 10/10/2007 8:39:55 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
Also...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1179639/posts
16 posted on 10/10/2007 8:41:40 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cinives

This article criticizes rationalism, which Hume reintroduced to philosophy. Rationalism, in philosophy, has a very specific meaning—it does not mean “being rational” or “using reason;” it is the philsophical mistake of believing truth can be arrived at by “reason alone,” without reference to that reality we are conscious of.

I think what you are calling “rationalism” is what nowadays we mean by rationalization.

Hank


17 posted on 10/10/2007 8:43:32 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

For Hume, “ideas” are like fuzzy pictures or representations of what we directly experience. The idea “dog” or “table” is just an incomplete “picture” of a dog or table recalled from memory.


For some reason this reminds me of Clinton and his famous “depends on what is is.” Words used to have very clear meanings.


18 posted on 10/10/2007 8:45:50 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

(It's Edmund Burke)

19 posted on 10/10/2007 8:50:22 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief

later read


20 posted on 10/10/2007 9:18:06 AM PDT by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson