Skip to comments.
Hume, Father of Postmodernism and Anti-rationalism—Part 1
The Autonomist ^
| 10/10/07
| Reginald Firehammer
Posted on 10/10/2007 8:12:38 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: Fzob; P.O.E.; PeterPrinciple; reflecting; DannyTN; FourtySeven; x; dyed_in_the_wool; Zon; ...
PHILOSOPHY PING
(If you want on or off this list please freepmail me.)
Hank
To: Hank Kerchief
Why not go back to Bishop Berkley?
3
posted on
10/10/2007 8:18:06 AM PDT
by
Borges
To: Hank Kerchief
Firehammer? I want a cool last name like that.
4
posted on
10/10/2007 8:24:38 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(George Orwell was a clairvoyant.)
To: Hank Kerchief
5
posted on
10/10/2007 8:26:06 AM PDT
by
lafroste
(gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
To: Hank Kerchief
There’s only one problem; rationalism underpins atheism, and therefor enables socialism, communism, and things like death camps and medical experiments on humans like the Nazis.
The only savings of the human race is the Judeo-Christian ethic.
6
posted on
10/10/2007 8:34:56 AM PDT
by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: wastedyears
"Firehammer? I want a cool last name like that."
Well, as long as we are talking philosophy, lemme throw at you -- Ludwig Feurerbach....
7
posted on
10/10/2007 8:35:40 AM PDT
by
litehaus
(A memory tooooo long)
To: Hank Kerchief
8
posted on
10/10/2007 8:36:35 AM PDT
by
joeystoy
To: wideawake
Thought you might like this.
9
posted on
10/10/2007 8:36:51 AM PDT
by
Borges
To: Borges
While both Berkeley and Hume are today wrongly classified at empericists (they were in fact idealists), Hume’s “philosophy” is much more rich in the bad ideas that would effect the future of philosophy. The positivists, for example, were strongly influenced by Hume, but mostly dismissed Berkeley, I think.
Regi
To: Hank Kerchief
To: Hank Kerchief
To: litehaus
13
posted on
10/10/2007 8:37:32 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(George Orwell was a clairvoyant.)
14
posted on
10/10/2007 8:39:36 AM PDT
by
Varda
To: Hank Kerchief
Richard Gere said that Bishop Berkley was his favorite philosopher. So you have Hume-> Positivists vs. Berkley-> Gere.
But seriously though Berkley was the first philosopher to make the claim that language can be used fora variety of things besides describing things. He was extremely important.
15
posted on
10/10/2007 8:39:55 AM PDT
by
Borges
To: Hank Kerchief
Also...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1179639/posts
16
posted on
10/10/2007 8:41:40 AM PDT
by
Borges
To: cinives
This article criticizes rationalism, which Hume reintroduced to philosophy. Rationalism, in philosophy, has a very specific meaning—it does not mean “being rational” or “using reason;” it is the philsophical mistake of believing truth can be arrived at by “reason alone,” without reference to that reality we are conscious of.
I think what you are calling “rationalism” is what nowadays we mean by rationalization.
Hank
To: Hank Kerchief
For Hume, “ideas” are like fuzzy pictures or representations of what we directly experience. The idea “dog” or “table” is just an incomplete “picture” of a dog or table recalled from memory.
For some reason this reminds me of Clinton and his famous “depends on what is is.” Words used to have very clear meanings.
18
posted on
10/10/2007 8:45:50 AM PDT
by
PeterPrinciple
( Seeking the truth here folks.)
To: Hank Kerchief
(It's Edmund Burke)
19
posted on
10/10/2007 8:50:22 AM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: Hank Kerchief
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson