Skip to comments.
Why Are Democrats Afraid to Denounce MoveOn?
FOX News ^
| Tuesday, September 18, 2007
| John Gibson
Posted on 09/18/2007 4:59:38 PM PDT by indcons
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
1
posted on
09/18/2007 4:59:48 PM PDT
by
indcons
To: indcons
2
posted on
09/18/2007 5:01:29 PM PDT
by
Squidpup
("Fight the Good Fight")
To: indcons
Because many of them hate America and agree with MoveOn.
To: indcons
The RATS aren’t *afraid* to denounce moveon.org.They don’t denounce them because they *agree* with them!
4
posted on
09/18/2007 5:02:22 PM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)
To: indcons
5
posted on
09/18/2007 5:02:37 PM PDT
by
nevergore
("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
To: indcons
Money...either given to their campaigns or to be used against them.
6
posted on
09/18/2007 5:03:14 PM PDT
by
toddlintown
(Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: indcons
Money and votes. Not that they can’t get them both illegally.
7
posted on
09/18/2007 5:03:26 PM PDT
by
freekitty
(May the eagles long fly over our beautiful and free American sky.)
To: indcons
8
posted on
09/18/2007 5:03:57 PM PDT
by
vietvet67
To: Always Right
9
posted on
09/18/2007 5:04:20 PM PDT
by
indcons
To: indcons
The reason is simple: MoveOn.Org is targeting Democrats who they think aren’t sufficiently anti-war. The Democratic candidates don’t want to alienate them, even if they disagree with them.
10
posted on
09/18/2007 5:04:37 PM PDT
by
jude24
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: indcons
Because moveon.org is very well-funded and each Democratic candidate has to play it so that they might be able to use that asset against the other candidates. The Republicans aren’t even on the radar screen yet.
To: indcons
errrr..... because MoveOn.org owns them.
12
posted on
09/18/2007 5:05:52 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: indcons
Shrillary passed up a perfect Sister Souljah opportunity last week by refusing to bitch slap MoveOn over their outrageous General Betray Us ad. The people are unhappy with the war, but they respect General Petraeus and the military.
The further left MoveOn can pull them, the more the Donks come across as moonbats, the better.
13
posted on
09/18/2007 5:09:03 PM PDT
by
cynwoody
To: indcons
Three simple reasons:
1) Democrat party money comes from Soros-backed groups like MoveOn;
2) The democrat party is anti-American;
3) Liberals, although they continually laud each other as “intellectuals”, are really not that intelligent.
14
posted on
09/18/2007 5:09:40 PM PDT
by
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
To: indcons
Seriously? Because MoveOn owns them, that's why. They stand up to it and suffer broken kneecaps. So they keep quiet.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
15
posted on
09/18/2007 5:11:01 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Squidpup
Speaking of that, the Net was sloooow for several minutes. Did any one else experience it or was it just my imagination?
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
16
posted on
09/18/2007 5:12:15 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: indcons
George Soros, the rotten anti-American communist is behind this group. MoveOn.org OWNS the Democrats!
They OWN the Democrats! The Democrats have painted themselves into a corner on this one. By failing to denounce and remove themselves from the same company, they proclaim that they have no problem with the anti-American, lunatic views of these creeps.
They have, in fact, sided with this group.
How long can the Democratic party remain?
17
posted on
09/18/2007 5:14:31 PM PDT
by
milford421
(U.N. OUT OF U.S.)
To: Billthedrill
That’s right. As other posters have pointed out it’s money, votes (according to Move.On’s own website, as of ‘05 they had 3.3M members) and the Dems need this group to do the dirty work so they don’t have to. Move.On can print anything they want in the NYT and Hillary can just say, well, they’re not part of our campaign, they are an “independent organization” free to do whatever they want within the law. Talk about convenience.
18
posted on
09/18/2007 5:21:07 PM PDT
by
khnyny
To: nevergore
19
posted on
09/18/2007 5:22:22 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
(I don't want to find "common ground" with a bunch of damn leftists.)
To: indcons
[”I’ve never had that opinion, and I’ve said publicly on numerous occasions, including at the last hearing, how much I respect Gen. Petraeus and his service to our country.” ]
Didn’t she TELL him his comments ‘streched the limits of credulity’ or some such? IOW, she accused him of LYING! A difference without a discinction.
20
posted on
09/18/2007 5:24:27 PM PDT
by
dbacks
(I forgot to pay the rent on my tagline.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson