Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Are Democrats Afraid to Denounce MoveOn?
FOX News ^ | Tuesday, September 18, 2007 | John Gibson

Posted on 09/18/2007 4:59:38 PM PDT by indcons

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 09/18/2007 4:59:48 PM PDT by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: indcons
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
2 posted on 09/18/2007 5:01:29 PM PDT by Squidpup ("Fight the Good Fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Because many of them hate America and agree with MoveOn.


3 posted on 09/18/2007 5:01:45 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons
The RATS aren’t *afraid* to denounce moveon.org.They don’t denounce them because they *agree* with them!
4 posted on 09/18/2007 5:02:22 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Easy, They’re gay!


5 posted on 09/18/2007 5:02:37 PM PDT by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Money...either given to their campaigns or to be used against them.


6 posted on 09/18/2007 5:03:14 PM PDT by toddlintown (Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Money and votes. Not that they can’t get them both illegally.


7 posted on 09/18/2007 5:03:26 PM PDT by freekitty (May the eagles long fly over our beautiful and free American sky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

$$$$$$$$$$


8 posted on 09/18/2007 5:03:57 PM PDT by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

BUMP


9 posted on 09/18/2007 5:04:20 PM PDT by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: indcons

The reason is simple: MoveOn.Org is targeting Democrats who they think aren’t sufficiently anti-war. The Democratic candidates don’t want to alienate them, even if they disagree with them.


10 posted on 09/18/2007 5:04:37 PM PDT by jude24 (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Because moveon.org is very well-funded and each Democratic candidate has to play it so that they might be able to use that asset against the other candidates. The Republicans aren’t even on the radar screen yet.


11 posted on 09/18/2007 5:05:03 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

errrr..... because MoveOn.org owns them.


12 posted on 09/18/2007 5:05:52 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons
Shrillary passed up a perfect Sister Souljah opportunity last week by refusing to bitch slap MoveOn over their outrageous General Betray Us ad. The people are unhappy with the war, but they respect General Petraeus and the military.

The further left MoveOn can pull them, the more the Donks come across as moonbats, the better.

13 posted on 09/18/2007 5:09:03 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Three simple reasons:

1) Democrat party money comes from Soros-backed groups like MoveOn;

2) The democrat party is anti-American;

3) Liberals, although they continually laud each other as “intellectuals”, are really not that intelligent.


14 posted on 09/18/2007 5:09:40 PM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons
Seriously? Because MoveOn owns them, that's why. They stand up to it and suffer broken kneecaps. So they keep quiet.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

15 posted on 09/18/2007 5:11:01 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squidpup
Speaking of that, the Net was sloooow for several minutes. Did any one else experience it or was it just my imagination?

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

16 posted on 09/18/2007 5:12:15 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: indcons

George Soros, the rotten anti-American communist is behind this group. MoveOn.org OWNS the Democrats!

They OWN the Democrats! The Democrats have painted themselves into a corner on this one. By failing to denounce and remove themselves from the same company, they proclaim that they have no problem with the anti-American, lunatic views of these creeps.

They have, in fact, sided with this group.

How long can the Democratic party remain?


17 posted on 09/18/2007 5:14:31 PM PDT by milford421 (U.N. OUT OF U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
That’s right. As other posters have pointed out it’s money, votes (according to Move.On’s own website, as of ‘05 they had 3.3M members) and the Dems need this group to do the dirty work so they don’t have to. Move.On can print anything they want in the NYT and Hillary can just say, well, they’re not part of our campaign, they are an “independent organization” free to do whatever they want within the law. Talk about convenience.
18 posted on 09/18/2007 5:21:07 PM PDT by khnyny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nevergore

LOL!


19 posted on 09/18/2007 5:22:22 PM PDT by SIDENET (I don't want to find "common ground" with a bunch of damn leftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: indcons

[”I’ve never had that opinion, and I’ve said publicly on numerous occasions, including at the last hearing, how much I respect Gen. Petraeus and his service to our country.” ]

Didn’t she TELL him his comments ‘streched the limits of credulity’ or some such? IOW, she accused him of LYING! A difference without a discinction.


20 posted on 09/18/2007 5:24:27 PM PDT by dbacks (I forgot to pay the rent on my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson