The polar bears seem unconcerned with this development...
Posted on 09/16/2007 8:08:52 PM PDT by camerakid400
Do you have to be so crude about it?
Wholly crap!!
Hey, I just took the headline from HotAir.
So why didn’t these microbes in mammoth poop cause global warming when the mammoths were alive? Now all of a sudden they’re going to cause global warming?
How is this different than all the animal & humas waste we deal with now? Is this some sort of “Super Dung” that can really effect the weather????????
I think not. This guy is drinking the Gore Kool Ade.
In reality, a lot of that organic matter is busily converting to crude oil, which might help explain why Russia is one of the world’s argest producers of oil and natural gas.
As to the claims about the aroma of mammonth poo...who can say for sure, since the mammoths haven’t made a fresh deposit in several millennia...???
Who changed my headline???????????????????????????????????
“It smells like mammoth dung,” he says.
This whole ‘report’....smells like dung!
LOL
And how does this guy know what mammoth dung smells like?
Maybe he was smelling a mammoth (read: enormous) dung?
In any event, sounds like a load of crap to me.
Forget man. I’m not measuring his testicles...
Dude, you’ve been modded!
FR is a classy place. Your headline lacked a bit of
‘savoir faire’, as it were. ;-)
If you link to a Reuters article, use a Reuters headline, please.
maybe if liberals pay some $ to the united nations for
do do credits
it will alleviate the problem.
/s
Global warming causes uncovering of mammoth dung which causes .... global warming.
Talk about circular reasoning...
I suppose it never occurred to this joker that if mammoth dung causes global warming, how come the dung is frozen?
It sure didn’t prevent the last ice age. And I saw a caption on a different global warming thread that said the melting glaciers may postpone our next ice age by 500,000 years.
That ought to satisfy those lunkheads who were yelling about the looming Ice Age back in the 1970s.
There is always climate change. What is optimal? What are we permitted to alter? And why are all the socialists lined up in agreement on this one?
I would be much more worried about the release of bacteria, parasites, etc, that humans have not been exposed to for tens of thousands of years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.