Skip to comments.
Web searchers may have found Fossett’s missing plane
Geek.com ^
| 9/13/07
| Doug Osborne
Posted on 09/13/2007 12:55:13 PM PDT by ZGuy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: PAR35
We’ll see, but it looks more like a rock formation to me.
21
posted on
09/13/2007 1:09:39 PM PDT
by
Route66
(America's Main Street - - - President Fred Dalton Thompson / POTUS 44)
To: PAR35
Maj Ed Dames of Coast to Coast fame remote viewed this too.Declared the plane crashed and Fossett died..He also said if he is wrong,he will quit remote viewing
22
posted on
09/13/2007 1:10:05 PM PDT
by
advertising guy
(If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
To: TChris
To: ZGuy
looks to intact to be a plane on a mountain side
24
posted on
09/13/2007 1:11:15 PM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: ZGuy
To: ElkGroveDan
On the surface, that looks like a survivable crash. Considering that a Citabria is mainly wood sticks and fabric... any crash isn't going to leave much. But hoping against hope, maybe he pulled off a landing.
26
posted on
09/13/2007 1:12:10 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Mark Felton
Is that a large cross near the plane? A signal? Old crash sites are typically marked with a large X so that future searches won't waste time on them. They do tend to get worn from weather and, the X marks are renewed IF someone gets around to it....
27
posted on
09/13/2007 1:14:48 PM PDT
by
ExSES
(the "bottom-line")
To: PAR35
My brother in law destroyed my Stinson on takeoff and it definitely didn’t have any 90 degrees angles you could have spotted. On the other hand I would suspect that Fossett would have used his skills to make sure the impact occurred with the minimum of speed, but if that blob at the nose is a big rock that he hit, I can imagine the wings and tail still being intact.
28
posted on
09/13/2007 1:15:15 PM PDT
by
ZGuy
To: mazda77; ZGuy
most of the immages on Google Earth are months if not years old. That was my first thought. I'm not familiar with "Mechanical Turk" but google-earth photos are often several years old. The photo of my house, for example, is at least 3 or 4 years old, not showing some changes that we've made in the last few years. So finding someone who went down in the last few days doesn't sound right.
29
posted on
09/13/2007 1:15:16 PM PDT
by
marron
To: advertising guy
Declared the plane crashed and Fossett died.That's a pretty safe guess at this point. The plane obviously wouldn't still be in the air, and heat and dehydration would have taken it's toll by now.
30
posted on
09/13/2007 1:15:22 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: ZGuy
I see no ground disturbance around it. It would have had to come in straight down, and the wings are still holding their shape. The image doesn’t appear to fit the image of a crash site.
I think he slammed into a mountain side, and, for all practical purposes, disintegrated. That could explain the lack of a crash site debris field, no signal from the ELT, and no signal from his watch.
Still Praying and hoping.
31
posted on
09/13/2007 1:15:37 PM PDT
by
papasmurf
(I'm for Free, Fair, and Open trade. America needs to stand by it's true Friend. Israel.)
To: Ramius
To: ZGuy
What they seem to have found is Christ...wearing a propellor hat and a crucifix....with his arms outstretched for a hug.
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
I heard something to the effect that over 100 unlocated planes some dating back to WWII are thought to be in the search area,don’t know if this true but properly so given the rugged terrain
34
posted on
09/13/2007 1:19:45 PM PDT
by
Charlespg
(Peace= When we trod the ruins of Mecca and Medina under our infidel boots.)
To: Mark Felton
No trailing debris...slide/skid...I dunno, but definitely worth a look.
35
posted on
09/13/2007 1:20:29 PM PDT
by
VaBthang4
("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
To: mazda77
...Not to pour cold water on this issue, but most of the immages on Google Earth are months if not years old....New satellite images of the area were done just for this search.
36
posted on
09/13/2007 1:21:00 PM PDT
by
FReepaholic
(Vini ,Vidi, VD: I Came, I Saw, I Cankered)
To: ZGuy
That sure looks like a high-wing plane of some kind.
Probably just a SuperCub flying pot that didn’t make it, though.
To: ZGuy
I found something that looks like a boat...
38
posted on
09/13/2007 1:26:28 PM PDT
by
johnny7
("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
To: Mark Felton
If it’s a cross on public land there will soon be a federal judge involved.
39
posted on
09/13/2007 1:30:27 PM PDT
by
em2vn
To: Ramius
The plane he was in was described as an acrobatic plane. Are they made of sticks and fabric?
40
posted on
09/13/2007 1:33:23 PM PDT
by
em2vn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson