Posted on 09/03/2007 5:24:49 PM PDT by Pharmboy
LOL! I forgot to add the proper cutline for my original post.
It should have been:
This is a test: For the next sixty secon]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
Study: many scientists are gaming the system.
I laugh everytime I see that! She could have at least tried to look better!
Not necessarily. Sometimes, given the choice, you choose the one you love.
Well sure she can. Any woman with legs like that has to be great in the kitchen.
Wow. That’s one heck of beautiful fish.
Pretty woman, too. Shouldn’t she be gutting that thing and getting the frying pan ready?
I’d choose the fish and consider the woman extra!
Just thought I'd point that out.
“That’s not even long enough to make a first impression.”
That’s what made this such a silly study. Given five minutes to evaluate a given woman, men will never get further than initial physical attraction. That doesn’t mean that’s all men care about. It’s just important and it’s really all they can evaluate in five minutes anyways.
Six kegs, ten joints, and Mexican tar still wouldn't do it.
She’s quite lovely, but I haven’t had dinner yet, and I can’t forget a salmon caught maybe 60 miles south of where that photo was taken. Probably the best meal of my life.
If you wanna be happy for the rest of your life,
Never make a pretty woman your wife.
So from my personal point of view,
Get an ugly girl to marry you.
This study is “One Million Years B.C.” too late...
Men did go for Raquel Welch...
The older, more attractive one in most cases.
This is really where women’s beauty and personality can trump age. Women can write their own ticket if they have kept themselves well.
And we guys really appreciate that.
What stick?The whole tree fell on her.
You guys are all being a little bitter. We don’t always go for the money. When I met my husband he had no job and had given notice on his apartment - but forgot to get a new place - so in a couple of weeks he moved into his parents’ garage - I married him when I was 18 and 25 years and five kids later, you know it’s all good.
Lots of nice girls out there. A guy with no job, lazy, he’s just probably not a good man. We can’t help but figure that out. But he doesn’t have to be rich.
We’re vulnerable, you know, with all the pregnancy and little kid stuff we deal with. We need a man able to provide when we are not able to.
This moron obviously lacks all charming behaviour and he will have problems in getting any female attention at all. Of course a male can think that way since a woman has its highest fertillity with 16, but it should be intelligible that such is BS.
Women in their 30ties are naturally a much more capable partners than 16 year old kids. Therefore it does not make sense to a strong man in his 40ties to deal with adolescents. He will look for something suitable. :)
Guys like your friend lack obviously the strengh to deal with a real partner.
They were thinking maybe men went for fat mama’s with yubangee lips?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.