Iraqi PM lashes out at Clinton, other U.S. critics(Good for him)

Reuters ^ | August 26, 2007 | Waleed Ibrahim

[lentulusgracchus]

Good riposte. BTTT.

[Maumee]

Oh oh cap’n Kirk is up! Tell us cap’n why did we go to war against those innocent Germans and Italians they were no where near Pearl Harbor.

[lentulusgracchus]

We will be removing our troops so when Al-Qaida starts to murder you all at an alarming rate please die quietly we would not want to take the blame it.

If our Democrat friends have noticed the floor tilting a bit, that's the scales of history beginning to measure out their just due for what they pulled in Vietnam.

Which, of course, is exactly what they intend to do to the Iraqis that we just liberated from Saddam, only this time the brighter Democrats have begun to realize......they could begin to get a reputation for this stuff!

And not a very savory one. Well, they're a couple of wars behind, but at last it's beginning to dawn on a few of them: When it gets down to the nut-cutting, you'd better be willing to stand up and stay standing until it's over.

[Freee-dame]

And DBM = ?

Drive By Media....They just spew out claims and attacks without backing and "drive" on, often to state the same thing over an over using each other as references. I think Rush started using the expression.

[2111USMC]

Yeah, but you have to admit, Maliki’s forging ties with Iran could represent a huge step backwards.

If Maliki’s intention is to introduce a full Shiite Islamic fundamentalist repressive government, Iraqi democracy and civil rights are thrown out the window.

[thefactor]

come on bro. i just think it was a poor choice of words for the PM. that's it. it's too easy to rebutt the point and talk about the military action.

if we were allowed to fight this war the way war is supposed to be fought, we would be in a much more enviable position right now.

thank you very much ACLU and the democrats at large...

[thefactor]

what-EVER. see post #46.

[Vanbasten]

“Yeah, but you have to admit, Maliki’s forging ties with Iran could represent a huge step backwards.”

I’m unsure of his complete intentions. Look, the guy is in a tough spot, and the democrats aren’t helping. Perhaps, his negotiations with Iran are his plan B if we abandon him.

Irregardless of what his motives are, he must deal with Iran one way or another simply because of the geography. With Iraqi troops just beginning to pull their own weight, now is not the time for him to adopt a hard line with the Iranians.