Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SubQuantum Kinetics, wide ranging unifying cosmology theory by Dr. Paul LaViolette
THE STARBURST FOUNDATION ^ | January 2007 | Dr. Paul LaViolette

Posted on 08/22/2007 12:00:43 PM PDT by Kevmo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: ari-freedom

I agree.

Apparently so did a Nobel Prize-winning Physicist as well, so I’m hoping there are some freepers who can look into this and let us know if it’s viable.


21 posted on 08/22/2007 1:05:14 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nuke rocketeer
kinda LaRouchian

Perhaps in the quantity of information, but not so firmly based in reality as LaRouche.

22 posted on 08/22/2007 1:05:53 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

whether it is viable or not isn’t even the point as he may be raising questions that the mainstream isn’t even addressing or brushing under the rug.


23 posted on 08/22/2007 1:13:34 PM PDT by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
the mainstream isn’t even addressing

The mainstream what? Astronomy? Astrophysics? MSM?

24 posted on 08/22/2007 1:16:47 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
the mainstream isn’t even addressing

The mainstream what? Astronomy? Astrophysics? MSM?

25 posted on 08/22/2007 1:17:21 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Too long, didn’t read.


26 posted on 08/22/2007 1:25:47 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

Violates the rule of seven plus, or minus two. Nobody will read this.


27 posted on 08/22/2007 1:27:43 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Humans have always loved a good Yarn...


28 posted on 08/22/2007 1:31:52 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

Sorry about it being so long.

I’ve noticed with this kind of material over the years that it ends up getting deleted from the web, so my habit is to put up as much as I want to see in 2-3 years after all the discussion is over & I’m searching for some particular minute point.

If I only put up links, the links will go stale after awhile.

At any rate, I find this stuff kind of fascinating, so if you can poke holes into any of it, please let us know.


29 posted on 08/22/2007 1:32:23 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
Thanks for posting ... but I have to say that the underlying tone of the text (I couldn't get through it all) was somewhat off-putting: self-serving, defensive.

All in all, I was left wondering whether he was accurately stating the "current state of science" at the time of his predictions, and whether the "verifications" were accurately reported.

30 posted on 08/22/2007 1:34:46 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
If you have the background, please let us know where the weakpoints are in these supposed verifications that are claimed for his theories. There are some eye-popping ones, like for SN1987 and the Pioneer Effect.

SN1987 was perfectly normal in relation to most current theories concerning blue giants.
The Pioneer anomoly has been attributed to numerous things such as propellant leaks, solar wind, miscalculations etc. It can't really be attributed to this theory.
31 posted on 08/22/2007 2:14:01 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
Prediction No. 2 (1985): Subquantum kinetics predicted that gravity should have two polarities correlated with charge and that the electron should produce a matter-repelling gravity field. Furthermore it predicted that monopolar electric discharges should produce longitudinal electric potential waves accompanied by a gravity potential component. Published in: 1985 (IJGS), 1990 (ISSS), and 1994 (Subquantum Kinetics).

Verification (2001): Drs. Evgeny Podkletnov and Giovanni Modanese discover that an axial high-voltage electron discharge produces a matter-repelling gravity wave that travels in the direction of the discharge exerting a longitudinal repulsive gravitational force on a distant test mass.


This is bogus. It (Drs. Evgeny Podkletnov's and Giovanni Modanese's discovery) remains an unverified claim. They claimed it was verified by two universities but the people who did the experiments that verified it are 'keeping quiet'. BS.
32 posted on 08/22/2007 2:25:02 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

Good stuff, thanks.


33 posted on 08/22/2007 2:31:15 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

This stuff is just plain over my head. One scientist could claim that it verifies the theory and another could claim that it doesn’t and I wouldn’t have a clue how to proceed.

http://www.atomicprecision.com/blog/wp-filez/ceramic%20superconducting%20electrodes.pdf

Investigation of high voltage discharges in low pressure gases through large ceramic superconducting electrodes
Evgeny Podkletnov, Giovanni Modanese

Moscow Chemical Scientific Research Center
113452 Moscow – Russia E-mail:
epodkletnov@hotmail.com
University of Bolzano

Logistics and Production Engineering Via Sernesi 1, 39100 Bolzano - Italy
E-mail: giovanni.modanese@unibz.it
Abstract: A device has been built and tested, in which a ceramic superconducting cathode and a copper anode cause electrical discharges in low pressure gases, at temperatures between 50 and 70 K. The electrodes are connected to a capacitors array charged up to 2000 kV; peak currents are of the order of 104 A. The cathode has the diameter of 10 cm and is fabricated by OCMTG technology. In discharges at voltage above 500 kV two new phenomena were observed, probably related to each other. First, the discharge does not look like a spark, but is a flat, glowing discharge, which originates from the whole surface of the superconducting electrode. Furthermore, a radiation pulse is emitted at the discharge, which propagates orthogonally to the cathode, towards the anode and beyond it, in a collimated beam, apparently without any attenuation. The radiation pulse carries an energy of 10-3 J at least. The features and the nature of this radiation have been investigated by several means, still it was not possible to identify it; we can only exclude that it is electromagnetic radiation or any other radiation with energy-momentum relationship E=cp.

.... snip....

6. Conclusions
The occurrence of the observed flat discharges is related to the crystal structure of the superconducting cathode. Since the high-conductivity ab planes are parallel to the surface, the electric field at this surface is extremely uniform. During the discharges intense supercurrents flow through the cathode in the c crystal direction. The superconducting charge carriers “leap” by tunnelling through 10 or more ab planes in the discharge time. Due to macroscopic quantization, their wave functions keep a coherent phase in the motion. The non-electromagnetic radiation emitted in this process seems in fact to be spatially coherent and its wavelength is probably connected to the lattice spacing of the YBCO crystals.


34 posted on 08/22/2007 3:07:01 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Thanks for posting.

Articles like this (and the discussions they provovke) are illustrative of the intellectual caliber of this site. You never see anytyhing even remotely cerebral coming from the DUmmies, Kosmunists, or any other liberal garbage bin.


35 posted on 08/22/2007 3:35:49 PM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

These guys claim to have verified the /Modanese claim.

March, 2006: Dr’s Tajmar & de Matos publish experimental results on the Los-Alamos pre-print server claiming up to 100 µg change in the acceleration of a rotating superconductor. These results are claimed to have been the result of 250-independent experiments over a 3-year period, and demonstrate a much stronger gravitomagnetic coupling than previously thought possible, raising renewed interest in earlier experimental claims by Podkletnov, Li, and others…

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0603033

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Title: Experimental Detection of the Gravitomagnetic London Moment
Authors: M. Tajmar, F. Plesescu, K. Marhold, C.J. de Matos
(Submitted on 9 Mar 2006)
Abstract: It is well known that a rotating superconductor produces a magnetic field proportional to its angular velocity. The authors conjectured earlier, that in addition to this so-called London moment, also a large gravitomagnetic field should appear to explain an apparent mass increase of Niobium Cooper-pairs. This phenomenon was indeed observed and induced acceleration fields outside the superconductor in the order of about 10^-4 g were found. The field appears to be directly proportional to the applied angular acceleration of the superconductor following our theoretical motivations. If confirmed, a gravitomagnetic field of measurable magnitude was produced for the first time in a laboratory environment. These results may open up a new experimental window on testing general relativity and its consequences using coherent matter.
Comments: Submitted to Physica C
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Cite as: arXiv:gr-qc/0603033v1


36 posted on 08/22/2007 4:00:56 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

oops, make that the Podkletnov/Modanese claim


37 posted on 08/22/2007 4:02:29 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

I used to be the technology marketing manager for a major corporation. There is a strong correlation between genius and eccentric (sometimes insane) behavior.


38 posted on 08/22/2007 4:20:23 PM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

Did you actually read all of this? That in itself is astounding.


39 posted on 08/22/2007 4:22:18 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Thanks a million for the summation.


40 posted on 08/22/2007 4:36:27 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in small groups or in whole armies, we don't care how we do it, but we're gonna getcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson