Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge dismisses sexual harassment charges against 2 Ore. teens
KGW.com ^ | 8-20-07 | WILLIAM McCALL

Posted on 08/20/2007 11:32:16 AM PDT by rednesss

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 last
To: lady lawyer
There’s nothing sexual about it. That’s the difference.

And that's not an assumption? At a minimum, it seems as if it would be situational, depending on the sexual orientation of the giver and receiver of the gesture, among other things such as the degree of privacy and overall tone of the total interactions.

I don’t think groping is just “horseplay.”

What is the definition of "groping" that you are using? It almost seems ... for lack of a better term ... unequal...

And I think there may be a Brokeback Mountain joke in all this somewhere... :-)

201 posted on 10/09/2007 11:18:56 PM PDT by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
What I heard is that the girls did try to get the school to stop it, but the school didn’t stop it. Hence, the cops were called.

As I’ve said before, what they did met the legal definition of sexual assault. As for any defense that the acts were not intended to be sexual in nature, I suspect that the dry-humping would put the lie to that.

Allegedly did. No trial.

And-- hearsay.

202 posted on 10/09/2007 11:41:12 PM PDT by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Hillary

Amen!


203 posted on 10/09/2007 11:41:16 PM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

These were not men. They were kids and it never should have gone as far as it did. People are going nuts!


204 posted on 10/09/2007 11:54:18 PM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
I’ve never seen any suggestion that the girls backed off their allegations. Was this in another article?

Via Michelle Malkin (Aug. 14):

The Oregonian obtained a copy of the police report:

Although the contents weren’t discussed at Monday’s hearing, The Oregonian was able to review a copy. In the Feb. 28 report, a female Patton student and her mother dispute Roache’s account of an interview with the girl a week earlier concerning “party-boy” dancing.

In his initial police report Feb. 22, Roache said the girl told him that Mashburn and Cornelison writhed up against her in a sexually suggestive form of dance. Roache described the moves as “party-boy dancing” from the movie “Jackass.”

But in the Feb. 28 report, taken by a different McMinnville police officer, the girl said there was never any touching involved and that she did not believe Mashburn or Cornelison should be charged with a crime.

Two other female students also disputed Roache’s police report during a hearing in February. The girls testified that they felt pressured under questioning from Tillery and Roache to say things that weren’t true.

It's perhaps advisable to use "allegedly" when describing actions taken by defendants in cases such as these that do not go to trial.

205 posted on 10/10/2007 12:06:20 AM PDT by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson