Posted on 08/19/2007 9:52:10 AM PDT by wagglebee
That decision was already made for Wombat.
Conservatism needs no qualifiers. No "neo", no "paleo", no "compassionate".
Conservatism is Conservatism. Any qualifier or modifier deems it counterfeit.
Exactly, whenever someone starts qualifying their conservative beliefs, it means that there is a significant portion of the conservative platform that they disagree with. And since they never seem to be talking about raising taxes, it usually means that they are pro-death and pro-militant homosexualism.
"A political party cannot be all things to all people."
Ronald Reagan said that on March 1, 1975.
?;^T
Seldom have I seen a more deserved lightning bolt.
READ the Constitution for yourself...
Article V
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress;...
Sow. Reap.
Bill Clinton was/is serial adulterer with a power-crazed wife and conservatives consistently stated that character matter when he was running.
The same standards don't apply to RINO Rudy because he is a Republican? Double Standard?
I don’t recall Reagan ever having committed adultery, let alone in office. But, divorce isn’t the reason to oppose Giuliani. The fact that he is liberal that is in favor of using taxpayer dollars to kill unborn children and did nothing but promote the homosexual agenda while mayor of New York are very good reasons to oppose him.
Thompson and even Romney. It's IMPOSSIBLE to win an election without a motivated base. Millions in the base will not vote for Giuliani and many others will not contribute or campaign for him. It's also not possible to win an election by scaring voters into voting against one's opponent.
Giuliani is the LEAST likely candidate running that can defeat Hillary.
Darn that Guliani and his nosy ducks.
It’s a lot like when someone want to identify themselves as a [fill in the blank]-American. Nine times out of ten, they could care less about America and will oppose anyone who doesn’t support [fill in the blank].
That was a hell of a coincidence. That guy had been on Free Republic for about six years. Just at 08/19/2007 2:09:54 PM CDT we smelled ozone. By 2:20:05 PM CDT Wombat101 was zotted, but good.
Don't worry, he'll be back under a different name. But, his irritating style will make him easy to recognize.
I hit the abuse button right after I posted #29.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1883415/posts?page=29#29
Jim recently banned a whole bunch of FRiberals who had been here for a long time. It seems that there were some longtime posters who were Republicans who joined because they hated the Clintons, but they also showed that they didn’t care for conservatives either.
Post #29? No wonder you concluded the bug zapper was on the blink.
Oh well, it was nothing that 300 megavolts from above couldn't handle.
I think after the April thread that Jim had to go get a commercial, nuclear-powered bugzapper. They take a while to fire up!
“The GOP front-runner...”
As reported by the Liberal MSM.. come on we all know better than that.
W
“I’ve worked with a lot of wise-quackers, but you are despicable.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.