Skip to comments.
10 Reasons Why Ron Paul Should be Vice President
USA ELECTION POLLS.COM ^
| 16 AUGUST 2007
| AP
Posted on 08/16/2007 5:33:32 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141 next last
To: Ditter
yes but he would abolish that position
21
posted on
08/16/2007 5:45:30 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
To: SolidWood
What Eugene McCarthy said about Walter Mondale: "He has the soul of a Vice President."
One witty Freeper made the excellent suggestion of making Paul ambassador to Nauru. Sounds about right.
Nauru is 8 square miles in area and has no army. They say it's slowly sinking into the Pacific. Sounds about right.
22
posted on
08/16/2007 5:46:44 PM PDT
by
x
To: conserveababe
I stand humbled at your your awesome reply. Job very well done...
23
posted on
08/16/2007 5:46:48 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Vote for the man who will keep those Barbary Pirates at bay, RON PAUL 1816!)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I really take exception to your #8. I think Dick Cheney is fantastic and he could do a superb job in any office.
In trying to kick Dick Cheney you make yourself look stupid.
24
posted on
08/16/2007 5:47:26 PM PDT
by
Ditter
To: pissant
Hate to tell you Pissant, but being an attorney is not a requirement.
25
posted on
08/16/2007 5:47:44 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: cripplecreek
You forgot “I’m just a country doctor”
26
posted on
08/16/2007 5:48:11 PM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
The one reason he shouldn’t be Vice President is that he’d be a heart beat away from being President.
To: crazyhorse691
Don’t get crazy on us now Crazy...
28
posted on
08/16/2007 5:48:33 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Vote for the man who will keep those Barbary Pirates at bay, RON PAUL 1816!)
To: org.whodat
Probably not, but I’m guessing its commonplace.
29
posted on
08/16/2007 5:49:04 PM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: org.whodat
I kind of wondered if being an attorney was a requirement.
30
posted on
08/16/2007 5:49:23 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
One reason he should NEVER be Pres or VP - he is a nut!!!!!!!
31
posted on
08/16/2007 5:49:50 PM PDT
by
mathluv
(Never Forget!)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
” He’s not going to win anyway....right?”
No. But people are free to support him. It’s just distracting when a small number of people try to spin his popularity so much.
32
posted on
08/16/2007 5:51:35 PM PDT
by
HereInTheHeartland
(Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
To: SolidWood
One witty Freeper made the excellent suggestion of making Paul ambassador to Nauru.
Paul is actually more suited to be King of Sealand.
To: Drango
Posting something in support of your candidate is one thing. Posting something in support of your candidate and then pinging your buddies to gang up on anyone who disagrees with the candidate is a whole different story. That’s what got the Rudy Boosters in trouble. The Paul boosters should learn from that example.
To: SolidWood
Fred and Ron? Now THAT’s absurd.
No, absurd would be Rudy/John...anything with a Ron in it would be a last ditch effort.
35
posted on
08/16/2007 5:53:37 PM PDT
by
crazyhorse691
(The faithful will keep their heads down, their powder dry and hammer at the enemies flanks.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
By selecting Ron Paul as a vice presidential running mate, you will keep him from running as an Independent third party candidate that spoils a close race against the eventual Democratic nominee. There have been many instances of libertarians running for office and spoiling a win for the Republican party in an attempt to move the party platform. I have thought about this, and wouldn't Ron Paul probably pull more away from the democrat candidate then the republican? Assuming Hillary wins, Ron Paul is the only legitimate antiwar vote and thus many young people and far left would be a fan (they would also be bigger fans of his libertarian views on social issues as they relate to government interference). I don't think a republican gets hurt by adding another antiwar candidate.
36
posted on
08/16/2007 5:57:33 PM PDT
by
SouthJrzReaganite18
("Mental institution, Michael, something you outta think about." - Fred Thompson to Michael Moore)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Do you Paulbots ever give up?
If the VP thing doesn’t work out, how about dog catcher?
37
posted on
08/16/2007 5:58:58 PM PDT
by
toddlintown
(Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
To: SouthJrzReaganite18
The far left are not fans of libertarianism. Libertarians oppose welfare, gun control, affirmative action, and federal funding of the arts - all liberal sacred cows.
You give the far left too much credit.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Now that’s some major brain trust thinking.
40
posted on
08/16/2007 6:04:53 PM PDT
by
jwh_Denver
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k08yxu57NA&NR=1)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson