Skip to comments.
Countrywide Crushed Again (Lost another 16% of their stock value to Ditech)
http://www.thestreet.com/s/countrywide-crushed-again/newsanalysis/banking/10373527.html?puc=_dm ^
| 8-10-07
Posted on 08/10/2007 5:53:06 AM PDT by Hydroshock
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-172 next last
To: Gabz
What does this mean for those of us with countrywide mortgages? Not much, they generate mortgages and service them, they don't hold the paper.
41
posted on
08/10/2007 6:50:09 AM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: Gabz
one of my investment properties has a 80% fixed and 15% that is a Home Equity line with Countrywide...one of these days I’ll pay off that HELOC...give countrywide a little more cash to play with...
To: Hydroshock
Too bad. Countrywide has always treated me right. Can’t say that for any of the others I’ve used.
To: HereInTheHeartland
The reason I am convinced that we are headed for a major recession is that refinances have generated cash for consumers over the last few years--that economic driver just isn't going to be there in the next couple of years.
44
posted on
08/10/2007 6:53:30 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Hillary's mob has plans for our liberties--hanging fruit.)
To: RockinRight
ARMs still cant adjust beyond their parameters - i.e., the margin and index. The only way this affects ARM rates is if the indexes like MTA, LIBOR, and COFI go up, and, if anything, theyll probably go down once all this hubbub calms down. How many of the ARMs' initial rates were far below their index rates, so that even if the market rates stay the same the mortgages' rates are guaranteed to go up? My first car loan was a variable one like that. The initial interest was 9% (decent for a kid still in college), then it jumped to 14% three months later because it was set to be some percentage above an index which had absolutely nothing to do with the initial 9%.
I have avoided variable rate loans since then.
45
posted on
08/10/2007 6:54:09 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(May the heirs of Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski rise up again to defend Europe.)
To: Hydroshock
Aren’t they really, really BIG? And respectable? Like Enron? How can Ditech be cleaning their clock? I thought they were just a scam, though since they were bought by GMAC I had to figure they were a playa.
46
posted on
08/10/2007 6:56:11 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
("Liberals read Karl Marx. Conservatives UNDERSTAND Karl Marx." Ronald Reagan)
To: KarlInOhio
Most hybrid (3/1, 5/1, etc) ARMS are like that.
All I meant was what happened the last few days won’t make a 3/1 ARM that wasn’t supposed to adjust till June 2008 suddenly adjust now, nor will it take a margin of 2.25 over LIBOR and suddenly make the margin 3.5. Even ARM mortgages have contractual obligations.
47
posted on
08/10/2007 6:58:38 AM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Fred's Campaign: A hell of an opening, coast for a while, and then have a hell of a close.)
To: ichabod1
The “Ditech” thing is a joke, I think. I bet their stock isn’t doing that great either.
48
posted on
08/10/2007 6:59:05 AM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Fred's Campaign: A hell of an opening, coast for a while, and then have a hell of a close.)
To: Strutt9
Still, one reason I like being with them is because I don’t think they’re a here today, gone tomorrow sort of company. Also, a friend from church was my broker and got me a nice 6.25% rate and hooked me up with a wonderful real estate agent. But if they’re shaky it’s going to cost them in their ability to sell new loans.
49
posted on
08/10/2007 6:59:47 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
("Liberals read Karl Marx. Conservatives UNDERSTAND Karl Marx." Ronald Reagan)
To: ichabod1
Countrywide, Wells Fargo, B of A, Indymac, and Wells Fargo will all be OK. They might take a crunch, but they’ll survive just fine.
50
posted on
08/10/2007 7:02:24 AM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Fred's Campaign: A hell of an opening, coast for a while, and then have a hell of a close.)
To: cgbg
resetting ARMS (based on higher interest rates which reflect the perceived risk in the mortgage market) in the next few months will affect a lot of middle class folks with decent creditMaking the 5.25% - 30 year fixed I've got look like one of my better financial decisions ...
51
posted on
08/10/2007 7:02:59 AM PDT
by
tx_eggman
(ManBearPig '08)
To: Moonman62
...the government didn't bail out the S&L's. You still don't get it, do you? First, Congress had to appropriate over $30 billion to bail out the S&L's. This was because the insurance premiums paid by the S&L's to insure the deposits was inadequate to cover the losses. This means they used MY money to pay off bad loans made by the S&L's. That's a bailout. Second, I'm not sure I even agree with the gov't being in the insurance business. Why am I paying Nagin to rebuild New Orleans? I don't see them coming to Indiana to rebuild here after a tornado. To me, that's a bailout for NO. You can call the payments to the S&L's whatever you want, but when they come into my pocket to seek federal tax money to pay to private companies, that's a bailout.
52
posted on
08/10/2007 7:07:52 AM PDT
by
econjack
To: Hydroshock
Gawd just get their incessant commercials off my TV with that obnoxious ugly guy. And quit wearing a button down shirt with a suit jacket and no tie, it looks terrible!
53
posted on
08/10/2007 7:07:56 AM PDT
by
visualops
(artlife.us)
To: econjack; Moonman62
To me as well this is a bail out. And there will need to be more to feed this beast.
54
posted on
08/10/2007 7:14:41 AM PDT
by
Hydroshock
("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
To: ichabod1
"Still, one reason I like being with them is because I dont think theyre a here today, gone tomorrow sort of company. Also, a friend from church was my broker and got me a nice 6.25% rate and hooked me up with a wonderful real estate agent. But if theyre shaky its going to cost them in their ability to sell new loans."
Agreed, they are a pretty good company to deal with. I don't believe they are that shaky... granted they will have to eat some of the subprimes that they wrote via other mortgage/broker but they have enough cash to withstand it.
55
posted on
08/10/2007 7:16:46 AM PDT
by
Strutt9
To: Hydroshock
Like your opinion matters to me, though it makes me more confident that I’m right when you disagree. I get really concerned when you agree ;-)
56
posted on
08/10/2007 7:19:59 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: econjack
We all remember. The government bailed out the S & Ls.
57
posted on
08/10/2007 7:22:43 AM PDT
by
texastoo
((((((USA)))))((((((, USA))))))((((((. USA))))))))
To: Moonman62
This is another bailout and it will only make it worse.
58
posted on
08/10/2007 7:23:57 AM PDT
by
Hydroshock
("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
To: Moonman62
WSJ: “ A crucial date could be Aug. 15. That is 45 days before the end of the third quarter, the date when investors in many hedge funds can give notice that they are pulling out their money. If many give notice, it could spark a rash of selling by funds looking to raise cash to cover withdrawals.”
To: Hydroshock
Are you a parrot with computer access?
60
posted on
08/10/2007 7:25:22 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-172 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson