Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rellimpank

There are several designs and at least six have already been patented. Most are based on the Breathalyzer that police use, which makes it very expensive.

The more inexpensive versions measure blood-alcohol-content (BAC) through the thin skin on the inside of the elbow or wrist. These will keep the purchase price of the car reasonable.

Alcohol is a factor in 40% of our highway fatalities. As long as it doesn’t prevent people who are under the legal limit from operating a motor vehicle, I don’t think it’s a bad idea.


5 posted on 08/07/2007 5:07:57 PM PDT by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Bryan

Bryan, would you make these devices mandatory?


381 posted on 08/08/2007 10:25:52 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Bryan
Alcohol is a factor in 40% of our highway fatalities. As long as it doesn’t prevent people who are under the legal limit from operating a motor vehicle, I don’t think it’s a bad idea.

I think your keyboard should give you an IQ test before you can post. Stupidity is a factor in 40% of totalitarian ideas.....

453 posted on 08/09/2007 7:53:45 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (Taking my organs to hell with me....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Bryan

Should law-abiding citizens have to bear the implicit cost of such a device? What about false positives?


502 posted on 09/07/2007 9:58:14 PM PDT by Pencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Bryan
“As long as it doesn’t prevent people who are under the legal limit from operating a motor vehicle, I don’t think it’s a bad idea.”

That is ok. Then they will have a cigarette smoke/snuff detector saying an unhealthy smoker does not care about their life or the lives of others (second hand smoke) and therefore would not drive safely.

Then they will have a scales in the seat to prevent drivers over a set weight limit from driving because they are not only unhealthy thinkers but lack the flexibility and good sense to react to situations.

530 posted on 09/08/2007 3:46:03 PM PDT by A knight without armor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Bryan
You know what I think is a good idea? Let this be done, then, on the first fatality, serious injury, or crime (such as rape) that is linked to the failure of one of these devices:

Members of MADD, the politicians pushing this, and any other nanny stater supporting it should be thrown in prison.

Deal?

537 posted on 09/08/2007 8:40:35 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Bryan

“alcohol is a factor in 40% of our highway fatalities”
moving thru space faster than a slow crawl is responsible for 99.9% of highway fatalities. Make us all travel on all four and somebody Dies!


538 posted on 09/08/2007 8:40:38 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson