Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Engineers puzzle over bridge collapse
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6927526.stm ^

Posted on 08/03/2007 5:40:58 PM PDT by traumer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 last
To: jeffers

In the above post, second to last paragraph:

“...with the south end of pier six on top of them...”

should read:

“...with the south end of SPAN six on top of them...”

Sorry for any confusion.


141 posted on 08/11/2007 12:59:07 AM PDT by jeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

I wonder if its remotely possible to collapse a bridge by deliberately driving obscenely overloaded big rigs across it, I’m thinking of terrorists bypassing scales and hauling a load of heavy material like cast concrete to the point of vehicle axle/drivetrain failure. Instead of an 18 wheeler having a gross weight of under 80,000 lbs what if it was well over 250,000? Please do not nitpick about flat tires or broken axles as I have been a diesel mechanic for 35 years and I know it can be done. I have a three axle tractor with a two axle 24 cubic yard end dump trailer and it routinely hauls over 90,000 lbs.


142 posted on 08/11/2007 2:12:19 AM PDT by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: jeffers

Jeffers,

Thanks so much for taking the time to do a lengthy, technical post on the bridge collapse. Freepers like you make the Free Republic the outstanding web site that it is.

Ronzo


143 posted on 08/15/2007 7:20:43 PM PDT by Ronzo (Poetry can be a better tool of understanding than tedious scribblings of winners of the Noble Prize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: traumer
This article is simply wishy-washy. It adds no new information, and is in fact self-contradictory.

Resurfacing work was taking place, but the bridge was last inspected in 2006 and no significant structural problems were found.

...

In 2005, it was one of thousands across the US rated as "structurally deficient" on the federal National Bridge Inventory database.

Do these two descriptions seem at odds to anyone else? The best I can make of this is that none of the structural members were found to have problems. That is, no obvious cracks, corrosion, or loose joints. Hence the no problems call.

However, the design itself had little or no margin of safety - it depended on all members of the structure. Should any one fail, there was little or no redundancy in the design to take up the load. Hence the deficient rating.

Still, seems at odds. The gray area stuff that personal injury lawyers make hay with...

144 posted on 08/15/2007 7:30:28 PM PDT by CodeMasterPhilzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeMasterPhilzar

Was there ever a final conclusion ?
I didn’t see any news lately...


145 posted on 08/15/2007 7:55:42 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Not that I heard. I wouldn’t expect one for several months. Probably take weeks to go over the debris, run some computer simulations, etc.


146 posted on 08/16/2007 5:16:58 AM PDT by CodeMasterPhilzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Ronzo
this is my picture. you stole 8 of them by my count. they are clearly marked ALL RIGHTS RESERVED on each of the pages that you stole them from. Please remove them from this site immediately. this is a clear violation of copyright law. and you being a good christianist will understand following the law. don't you?
147 posted on 09/12/2007 9:05:54 PM PDT by tgraph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Ronzo

i appreciate the compliment, what i don’t appreciate is that you stole my photographs. please remove them from this and any other site. immediately. i will pursue a legal remedy if this isn’t taken care of by you voluntarily.


148 posted on 09/12/2007 9:06:21 PM PDT by tgraph (thou shall not steal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson