Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Atlantic Tropical Storms Have Doubled [byproduct of human-induced climate warming, researchers]
BREITBART ^

Posted on 07/29/2007 4:59:15 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
more junk science from the UK. They're enamored with this nonsense.........
1 posted on 07/29/2007 4:59:19 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I would have to agree that it is sloppy science.

Hmm? It won’t be too long before the tropical storms and hurricanes predicted, get downgraded once more.


2 posted on 07/29/2007 5:03:50 PM PDT by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Atlantic Tropical Storms Have Doubled [byproduct of human-induced climate warming, researchers]

Not to worry, it's offset by the fact that it's been 5 years now since I last had a tornado take shingles off my roof here in central Illinois.

3 posted on 07/29/2007 5:05:33 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Such BS. There was no way to know what was out in the open ocean until there was radar. Probably the second jump came with the addition of satellites.

Nothing convinces me more that Global Warming is a hoax than some of these “scientific findings” that even a 10-year-old could easily swat down given 30 seconds to think through the hypothesis.


4 posted on 07/29/2007 5:07:43 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (Global warming? Hell, in Texas, we just call that "summer".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Their findings were being published online Sunday by Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

"Findings" are useless in any science report without the Methodology = subjects, apparatus, experimental design, procedure, statistical analysis.

5 posted on 07/29/2007 5:09:08 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
From 1905 to 1930, the Atlantic-Gulf Coast area averaged six tropical cyclones per year

I wonder if the satellite data confirms this...
6 posted on 07/29/2007 5:09:23 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Go figure. Most storms don’t touch land, which was a prerequisite to being counted before 1970.

Oh the miracle of weather satellites. Perhaps we should stop launching weather satellites, so that the number of hurricanes will go back down.

7 posted on 07/29/2007 5:13:44 PM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Does the article say anything about the lack of satellites (thus lack of knowledge about storms that form but don’t hit land) in the early 20th century?


8 posted on 07/29/2007 5:15:24 PM PDT by Brakeman (America can do nothing for the Muslim world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Nice conclusion, leave out logic and cross your fingers hoping some ignoramus buys what your shoveling.

Those government paid propagandist must do heavy drugs believing weather satellites, able to track TS across the Atlantic/Gulf of Mexico, have been with us since the dawn of man. Where can you find evidence of all those TS that never hit land, let alone the ones that hit in desolate or undocumented areas.

Nice conclusion, leave out logic and cross your fingers hoping some ignoramus buys what your shoveling.

9 posted on 07/29/2007 5:16:06 PM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It has nothing to do with the fact we now have satellites that can track these storms. How the heck do they know how many tropical storms there were in 1900. What a bunch of lying a-holes.


10 posted on 07/29/2007 5:16:11 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Worse than "junk science" -- it's an outright lie.


11 posted on 07/29/2007 5:17:45 PM PDT by xcamel ("It's Talk Thompson Time!" >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rollo tomasi; All

Warning, don’t drink and post.

Must lay off the wine for the rest of the evening. I am starting to repeat myself.


12 posted on 07/29/2007 5:18:23 PM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Wasn’t this year supposed to be the worst on record?
13 posted on 07/29/2007 5:19:38 PM PDT by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brakeman

It is probably arrived from Ice core data, I am sure.


14 posted on 07/29/2007 5:20:22 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Maybe the number of storms have multiplied because the definition of what constitutes a tropical storm has been loosened? And perhaps 100 years ago many storms were not detected or considered just a thunderstorm?

The weather service issues a severe t storm warning now when the wind blows and it rains hard with a pebble of hail.
When I was a kid those were considered normal storms and we didn’t have to be told. Funny thing is.....many times the storm warnings are issued after the storm has already passed.


15 posted on 07/29/2007 5:21:37 PM PDT by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Wasn’t this year supposed to be the worst on record?

No, that was last year - coming off the record year of 2005. On the graph posted above us, note the hugh spike for 2005 but also notice hos that spike goes all the way back down for 2006.

16 posted on 07/29/2007 5:23:20 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (Global warming? Hell, in Texas, we just call that "summer".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Basic References:

Lawrence Solomon's "The Deniers" (a series of articles on the view of scientists who have been labelled "Global Warming Deniers"):

Other References:


17 posted on 07/29/2007 5:27:25 PM PDT by sourcery (fRed Dawn: Wednesday, 5 November 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Yeah, you get weird results when you carefully choose a 60 year period to average and compare it to a 10-year period, which, by the way, includes the single most active season on record.

Take that one year and average the other nine and I'll bet we're actually below average.

18 posted on 07/29/2007 5:27:55 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a Muggle when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

No mention that 1,100 years ago the incident of cat-5 hurricanes were from 4-10 times greater than present.


19 posted on 07/29/2007 5:29:40 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Atlantic Tropical Storms Have Doubled [byproduct of human-induced climate warming, researchers]”

Oh, go suck an Egg!


20 posted on 07/29/2007 5:33:56 PM PDT by bilhosty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson