UN agency gives 20th Century Fox web address to 'The Simpsons Movie'

Yahoo! Canada ^ | Jul 25, 2007

[Grizzled Bear]

That was my point exactly. There are some, even on this thread, who would welcome slavery. I truly believe most of the U.S. would not stand for it.

Unfortunately there are too many “conservative” politicians who think just like our naive friend.

[1rudeboy]

One other thing (you reminded me). Americans should have a strong scepticism of the U.N., for reasons that are obvious. Problem is, whenever someone (in this case, me) starts talking about a subject (such as IP) that requires cooperation between different states, the strawmen pile-up very quickly. "UN-lover?" My position on this legal matter implies that I approve of U.N. peacekeepers raping children? People need to be a little more serious.

[nicmarlo]

That’s all he knows how to do. And here I just complimented him last night that at least he’s not a jerk most of the time like so many pro-one-worlders/NAU’ers are.

[1rudeboy]

Very well, I'll update the list. For those of you keeping score out there in FReeperland, the following answers have been given to my question regarding how one enforces a U.S. injunction against a foreign entity:

1. shoot him, and
2. not enforce it.

[nicmarlo]

yep.

[1rudeboy]

Is that sarcasm? Here’s some more: there’s a big world outside the gates to your trailer-park.

[nicmarlo]

Agreed.

[Toddsterpatriot]

And when the UN white vans show up at a U.S. citizen’s home and knocks on their doors because Congress “wrote a treaty” saying it’s “legal”,

You think a UN van will show at the guy's house? LOL!

Do you understand how a treaty works?

[1rudeboy]

Was this the thread where you were whining that someone insulted you without giving you the courtesy of a ping, or was it another?

[nicmarlo]

tit for tat and all that.

you did the same to me earlier.

Animal Farm anyone?

[1rudeboy]

There are some, even on this thread, who would welcome slavery.

See what I mean? Textbook strawman. It's as if you're arguing with the voices in your head. No, you are arguing with the voices in your head. [chuckle]

[1rudeboy]

If I did the same to you, please point it out and I’ll apologize. Or shut up, your choice.

[jedward]

“the following answers have been given to my question regarding how one enforces a U.S. injunction against a foreign entity:

1. shoot him, and
2. not enforce it. “

This experience seems eerily similar to an incident with one of your friends. I have such a bad memory, but I do remember tying him in knots and rolling him off a different thread a while back.

So, you waste your precious time here and just mix up and change up your statements to show your intellect? Not working out too well for you. My answer, as was so bravely given to your demanding question was that it wasn’t enforceble. The question was not that of a Foriegn Entity, but rather a Foreign Entity on their own Soverign ground.

I took the time to type all of this out just as reminder to myself if I ever wonder why I just skip past your interconnecting, verbal gymnatics and outright “making stuff up” posts.

Have a great night :)

[1rudeboy]

Do you have a ballpark idea what the size of our economy (let’s say, GNP) would be if we built a moat and pulled-up the drawbridges?

[1rudeboy]

Are you saying I mischaracterized your answer? If so, what was it?

[jedward]

Did you find sarcasm in it? I see your friend has arrived. The great economist.

[1rudeboy]

Pondering if saying something “isn’t enforc[e]able outside of US territory, as well it shouldn’t be” is the same as saying “not enforce it.”

[1rudeboy]

“It isn’t enforcable outside of US territory, as well it shouldn’t be” is an example of sarcasm? In what language?

[Toddsterpatriot]

$13 trillion GDP. $1.8 trillion in imports $1 trillion in exports. Pulling up the drawbridge wouldn’t help.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Hey noob, what are you good at?