Skip to comments.
Congress: P2P networks harm national security
ZDNet ^
| July 24, 2007
| Anne Broache
Posted on 07/25/2007 12:39:57 PM PDT by Leo Carpathian
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: Leo Carpathian
Hollywood and the record industry want to stop P2P for natioal securi... I can't even finish it because its so silly.
What's next, casinos arguing that banks sending money to offshore gambling websites are a threat to the nation's shipping? Wait, that's why it was already put into a port security law in the last second in 2006.
21
posted on
07/25/2007 1:02:45 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(May the heirs of Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski rise up again to defend Europe.)
To: Leo Carpathian
Politicians charged on Tuesday that peer-to-peer networks can pose a "national security threat" because they enable federal employees to share sensitive or classified documents accidentally from their computers.
Given this kind of mentality, it's a little amazing that the Internet and it's subsequent technologies exist at all in their present form. Maybe we're in a brief Golden Era of information exchange for individuals, a little glimpse of sunlight before all control over information is in the hands of the government and entertainment industry lawyers.
To: Leo Carpathian
More idiocy. Equivalent to banning guns because “they kill people”, banning cars for the same reason, etc. It’s all in how you use the technology, not the technology itself. How about putting controls & penalties on that, huh? No, that would make too much sense. And besides, it wouldn’t involve politicians enriching themselves by taking special interest money from the same media organizations and industries who’ve tried [unsuccessfully] to go after P2P file-sharing technologies before — now for trumped up “national security” reasons. What a transparent joke.
23
posted on
07/25/2007 1:12:27 PM PDT
by
MCH
To: Leo Carpathian
anyone from california has no gravitas on this issue.
P2P attacks are just hollyweird puffery.
These are the identical arguments they used against cassette reocorders.
Perhaps they should also ban photocopiers just like the USSR.
24
posted on
07/25/2007 1:15:19 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: sittnick
I guess a hard drive might fit in Sandys pants.Or one of Waxman's nostrils.
25
posted on
07/25/2007 1:20:17 PM PDT
by
Vinnie
(You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
To: Leo Carpathian
Here's another national security threat:
![](http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:GhE1xKKeX5vR0M:http://www-scf.usc.edu/~mastorga/Pencil%2520on%2520pad%2520of%2520paper.JPG)
And another:
26
posted on
07/25/2007 1:21:20 PM PDT
by
sanchmo
To: Leo Carpathian
Speaking of P2P, is Lime Wire safe? Legal?
27
posted on
07/25/2007 1:23:44 PM PDT
by
Vinnie
(You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
To: Pete
Just block P2P access on Government computers and leave the rest of us alone.
You'd almost think that government would have blocked this already. I sometimes forget just how slow the government can be...
28
posted on
07/25/2007 3:42:47 PM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson