Posted on 07/18/2007 7:40:00 AM PDT by JKrive
In the interview, she said she believes possible triggers:
"whether its economic and drives us into the Amero" or
something "horrendous that will bring us under martial law under the Military Commissions Act and the National Defense Authorizations Act."
You can read her (article?) Two Acts of Tyranny on the Same Day about that.
: )
Oh, cool!
So ridiculous about the triggers - the country is unraveling at the seams. The American dream is just about dead and now it’s just a matter of time until the next bad thing happens and the dynasty can lock us in the camps/stadiums/our homes/whatever.
Well, you and I already know about the camps.
I’m still waiting to receive the letter which has my cell number assignment. : )
Good grief, totally. Those poor BP agents have been in solitary confinement now 180+ days (couldn’t hear the exact number), but around six months. SIX MONTHS!! Anyway, that’s probably how we’ll end up ...
By Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D.
December 7, 2006
Updated January 20, 2007
On October 17, 2006, 'a date which will live in infamy' . . . there were two acts of tyranny committed. The first was a public signing of the 'Military Commissions Act of 2006' which suspended habeas corpus allowing the president to declare you an 'enemy combatant' and end your rights to seek legal or judicial relief from unlawful imprisonment.The second act of tyranny took place in a private Oval Office ceremony, in which the president signed into law the 'John Warner National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2007' which essentially eliminates the protections of the Posse Comitatus Act and re-wrote the Insurrection Act. The NDAA will allow the president to declare a 'public emergency' and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to 'suppress public disorder'!
About The Military Commissions Act of 2006 . . .
"A writ of habeas corpus which is Latin for 'you have the body' [as proof] is a judicial mandate to a prison official ordering that an inmate be brought to the court so it can be determined whether or not that person is imprisoned lawfully and whether or not he should be released from custody."(1)
"The writ of habeas corpus serves as an important check on the manner in which state courts pay respect to federal constitutional rights. The writ is 'the fundamental instrument for safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless state action'."(1)
[snip]
I've been saying this for so long I'm hoarse. The gun grab comes with Martial Law. That's what they want. Our ability to defend ourselves against tyranny.
Who was it that said, 'the beauty of the second amendment is that we don't need it till we need it.' I'm probably plagiarizing a FReeper. lol
I don’t know, but I’ve heard that too. Can’t think who said it right now.
oops....we won’t need it till we need it.
Have you ever heard of incrementalism?
;)
You mean the same Judicial Watch that has yet to win a case????
I could care less who’s STORING THE DOCUMENTS RECIEVED UNDER FOIA.
But go ahead, and try to continue your diversionary tactics....keep flailing.
Keep drinking the NAU koolaid.... Give me proof besides nutbag Corsi...
I’ve already posted MOUNDS of evidence.
You’re the kool-aid drinkers obsessed with Corsi. I NEVER bring him up except to tell you globalists that I don’t mention him, foflol!
Read the thread and find the articles, already posted.
And, please, don’t get back to me. Keep your head in the sand. I won’t be joining you there.
Seriously, you aren’t willing to buy that offal, are you?
Calling Jerome Corsi a nutbag renders your point of view utterly worthless.
Well he is..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.