Conservatives Shouldn't Abandon Bush

Townhall.com ^ | July 13, 2007 | Mike Gallagher

[Anonymous Rex]

And you need to check who she was addressing in the post (88) you replied to her about.

[Anonymous Rex]

philman_36 has been here since 2000 so you obviously were talking about me.

Care to refute?

[Colorado Doug]

Maybe laurie_d and Kaslin should start referring to themselves a “North Americans” That would fit in better with their allegiance to the bush dynasty.

[Kaslin]

I am as much against illegal immigration as you are. But I am more concerned about those who want to harm us or our children. Notice the recent case about the Ukranian girl from Tacom Washington who was kidnapped by an illegal immigrant from Thailand and was found murdered the other day, not about those who want to come here to have a better life. I do wish though they would do it legally

[nuconvert]

I’m for Hunter, too. He’s the man with the right message and the most experience.

[Borax Queen]

Totally!

[melancholy]

Before I start, other Bush haters here on FR call me a “newbie” because I don’t have internet longevity. I’ll get that out of the way.

I'm one of the people who called you a Newbie. I was wrong; you're no Newbie. You have been a member of this site longer than I am, except for a short period when you were banned or quit on your own.

You accused me of Bush bashing which I did not. I have told you that although I'm disappointed in him I will not bash our CIC in time of war. That wasn't good enough for you.

I just advise you to stop using the reverse psychology of the "Newbie" thingy with "rolling eyes" as proof that you really are. I don't know who you are and I don't care. You won't fool many FReepers, though.

Finally, keep screamin' and howlin'; it won't do you any good.

[Anonymous Rex]

If they aren’t willing to come here legally I don’t want them here. I don’t care what their motivations or desires are. Do it right or you don’t deserve to be here.

[nuconvert]

This thread is an embarrassment.

[txrangerette]

You’re right about Hunter. Right man, right ideas, right experience. Beyond that, I will not support a hater and a DU type gutter dweller for President. My Presidential candidate had better be tough but a decent person who shows a decent respect where he should show it. Just like Duncan Hunter.

[Colorado Doug]

Am I the only one who agrees with this editorial? What’s happened to this site?

The problem in a nutshell is the our President is following in his fathers New World Order footsteps and wants to do in America, in favor of a North American Union, merging Mexico, the US and Canada into one society with common laws and no borders. It seems that he will stop at nothing to achieve this end.

Some of us think that America was a pretty good idea and we would like to keep it intact, Constitution and all.

[JeffAtlanta]

The nutters have mounted a coup. That’s why so many fine Freepers have left. Many can be found here http://www.wideawakes.net/forum/

LOL - I took a look at that site. It is basically a party loyalist site and that is fine if that is your thing. FreeRepublic, however, is a site based on ideology not party loyalism.

Note in the FAQ that the "pratical conservatives" at WideAwakes do not allow any bashing of liberal sites but they do actively discourage the formation of third parties. That shows that the members there do not care about ideology but only "having their team stay in power" - what the "team" actually stands for is irrelevant.

[Borax Queen]

The problem in a nutshell is the our President is following in his fathers New World Order footsteps and wants to do in America, in favor of a North American Union, merging Mexico, the US and Canada into one society with common laws and no borders. It seems that he will stop at nothing to achieve this end.

Didn't you get the memo that nationalism is passe? (gag)

[Colorado Doug]

Flame away because he has earned the name Jorge. He listens more to Mexican elite than his own supporters. El Presidente Jorge it is. He made a fool of me for supporting him all of these years. He will get no respect from me. He has disgraced his office.

[ovrtaxt]

Who abandoned who here?

[Colorado Doug]

Here let me fix that for you. GWB is the first president since Lincoln who has waged a war against Americans

There, that's better.

[BobS]

"This thread is an embarrassment."

Why are you blushing? Dubya probably learned Spanish early by getting women worked up at him. That's how to learn a language in a way to remember. Portuguesa is very confusing to learn after Spanish. Ciao!

[kabar]

By voting for non-conservative republicans, it just moves the party further and further to the left. Sometimes you have to take one step back to take two steps forward.

You do that in the primaries. Electing Dem candidates instead of supporting the GOP nominee makes no sense. You are taking one step back towards political impotence. The power of incumbency makes it difficult to gain back seats. Are you suggesting that if we can't defeat Lott in the primary, we should vote for his Dem opponent or not vote at all?

The exception to this is when it is a Republican running if a very liberal state. In that case, you go for the most conservative guy that is electable.

That encompasses most RINOs. And then you have the case of very red states electing Dems, e.g., Montana and North Dakota.

[nuconvert]

Obviously you haven’t figured out that this thread is just what the liberals ordered. It’s making their day.
Keep it up. They’re all enjoying having their water carried for them.
Then go back and read the original article.