Skip to comments.
Banana Boobs as Darwin's Clock (a response "Ten Politically Incorrect Truths About Human Nature")
FRED Columns ^
| July 8, 2007
| Fred Reed
Posted on 07/09/2007 4:46:53 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: JHBowden; GodGunsGuts; Aetius; Alamo-Girl; AndrewC; Asphalt; Aussie Dasher; AnalogReigns; ...
"
For example, with the dinosaurs, catastrophism is plainly used, given an asteroid finished them off 63 million years ago" If they were finished-off 63M years ago, how did the Inca know what they looked like 1500 years ago to etch them on stones?
21
posted on
07/09/2007 5:53:41 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: r9etb
"Why does that woman have 5 yellow breasts on her head?"Because the bunny with the pancake on its' head is still on an extended 4th of July holiday...
22
posted on
07/09/2007 5:56:51 PM PDT
by
chief_bigfoot
(Welcome to America. Please leave your hyphenation at the border.)
To: JHBowden
“Nevertheless, many people act as if Darwin is the Messiah, genes are our Gods, and natural selection is the all-pervasive Holy Ghost.”
Darwinists will spare no expense and go to great lengths to make monkeys of themselves.
Its my guess that if evolution worked they would be too stupid to do it.
23
posted on
07/09/2007 5:58:45 PM PDT
by
Beagle8U
(FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super Walmart for news .)
To: editor-surveyor
Well hello there ES! Just out of curiosity, have you read Dr. Humphreys book “Starlight and Time.” I’ve been researching it on the Net and as far as I can tell nobody (and I mean NOBODY!) has been able to refute his theory. I just ordered it and I am very much looking forward to reading it. Any thoughts on his refreshingly controversial theory?
To: r9etb
Most men don’t care about the color of women’s eyes and hair. They prefer women who when they say sit down, they lay down.
25
posted on
07/09/2007 6:00:54 PM PDT
by
EdArt
(free to be)
To: GodGunsGuts
PS I would be remiss if I failed to acknowledge that it was one of your replies to Coyoteman that brought my attention to the book. To be honest, I had never heard of it before you mentioned it—GGG
To: GodGunsGuts
Yes, I’ve read it.
It’s a good, clear explanation of the illusion of age of the universe. I don’t reccomend it to evo-believers; they’ll burst an anurism and go directly to their ultimate destination without passing ‘Go’ and without collecting eternal life :o(
27
posted on
07/09/2007 6:09:05 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: GodGunsGuts
That’s what I said. “Childish”.
To: sig226
To: editor-surveyor
LOL! So to your knowledge it has not been refuted? I’m just curious, because from what I have read, Dr. Humphreys has easily shot down every so-called refutation thus far. But I have only been looking into it for the last couple of days. At any rate, I’m very much looking forward to reading it...if for no other reason than just to aggravate the local League of Militant Godless chapter on FR.
To: GodGunsGuts
"
Any thoughts on his refreshingly controversial theory?" It's not really controversial. Most cosmologists see that it differs from the 'big bang' only in four key respects:
1. The assumption that Earth is at or near the center (supported mathematically)
2. It is a finite, bounded, rather than unbounded universe.
3. It doesn't gratuitously and deliberately mock God's word as a basis of it's promulgation.
4. It doesn't need the artificial constructs that the unbounded universe needs to work.
31
posted on
07/09/2007 6:20:48 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: GodGunsGuts
I like big boobs. I like small boobs. I like boobs.
32
posted on
07/09/2007 6:20:57 PM PDT
by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
“...I like boobs.”
Be careful with the open ended statements. One could conceivably understand that you are in effect saying that you like Al Gore.
33
posted on
07/09/2007 6:32:47 PM PDT
by
Nik Naym
(If Republicans are your problem, Democrats aren't the answer!)
To: Psycho_Bunny
“There were a few aspects of the original article I found questionable but this article is downright childish.”
Welcome to academia in the Twenty-first Century.
To: editor-surveyor
“If they were finished-off 63M years ago, how did the Inca know what they looked like 1500 years ago to etch them on stones?”
Discovery channel?
/sarc
To: GodGunsGuts
36
posted on
07/09/2007 6:43:23 PM PDT
by
tupac
To: editor-surveyor
Thanks, I’ll keep that in mind when I read it. I have been very impressed with Dr. Humphreys’ ability to defend his theory thus far. To say the least, I have a feeling we have not heard the last of his theory...not by a long shot.
To: Psycho_Bunny
This article is written by a moron. A downright childish moron.
38
posted on
07/09/2007 6:45:17 PM PDT
by
tupac
To: Psycho_Bunny
Are you being sarchasmic?
39
posted on
07/09/2007 6:46:19 PM PDT
by
LilAngel
(No blood for quislings)
To: GodGunsGuts
That article was especially ridiculous, unscientific and a vaporous concoction of foolish social deconstructionist whimsy presented as “science”. Eminently suited for a publication with the augustness and reliability of Psychology Today.
40
posted on
07/09/2007 6:52:02 PM PDT
by
bvw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson