[#1CTYankee]

Did anyone think Mr. Hernandez would change his views in this matter?

At least we gave him some mail to sift through, I'm guessing he doesn't get this much attention very often.

[PGalt]

My main point: “All the posturing about illegal immigrants is really an attack aimed at everybody whose name ends in ‘ez.’”

Roger that, hernandez. You would be the only dissembler/enabler here worth discussing.

[Nea Wood]

I think the racist is likely him. If the majority of the illegals were black, or Swedish, or anything other than Hispanic, he wouldn’t be so fond of them.

[2ndDivisionVet]

Demand a border fence! Build it NOW!! Beef up the border patrol and close our borders!

U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121

U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121

White House comments: (202) 456-1111

Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep

Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Toll free to the US Senate:

1-800-882-2005. (Spanish number)
1-800-417-7666. (English number)

Courtesy of a pro-amnesty group, no less!!

Republican National Committee
310 First Street, SE Washington, D.C. 20003
phone: 202.863.8500 | fax: 202.863.8820 | e-mail: info@gop.com

Take a look at their hidden agenda: http://www.mexica-movement.org

[steveo]

[Bogtrotter52]

Tried using his email address from the column. Did not work. Guess he does not want any input or differing opinion.

[Rb ver. 2.0]

Hernadez gets a hard-on from all this attention, he loves it as it’s the pinnacle of his career.

[Liz]

At least we gave him some mail to sift through, I'm guessing he doesn't get this much attention very often.

Playing the role of the "Eternal Victim" is very profitable.

Here's how the con game works:

You hyphenate your origins, join a regiatered hyphenate lobby group, and start "whining" that you are being "victimized."

Heck, In no time at all you have a bunch of pandering vote-hungry politicans rushing to your rescue, pleading your case, and pocketing your campaign contributions.

At the same time, pols earmark millions of tax dollars for every cockamamie federal/state program that finances your lack of "self-esteem".

After all, the US gov't is to blame if you have no self-esteem (snicker)

[#1CTYankee]

I love this part.

"One posting had the same bandito featured on Ralph's Mexifornia license (turns out it's the actor Alfonso Bedoya in "The Treasure of Sierra Madre")"

He had to go to FR to find out where it was lifted from, Ha!

[Liz]

This whining, whitey-hater is from New Jersey, no less.

Vote-hungry politicans in New Jersey actually live under the desks of hyphenated voting blocs.........hyphenate felate-a-thons are very popular in New Jersey.

Tax monies are piled on whining hyphenates in hopes they will solve their self-esteem problems in time for elections.

Man, the Taco Bell wrappers (scribbled with pol's name for illiterate voters who are registered to vote illegally) really pile up at polling places

One governor---McSleazy, the gay one---appointed only self-esteem challenged hyphenates to key state positions (whitey need not apply).

Trouble is nearly all of the hyphenated appointees are in jail, going to jail, or are under investigation for government fraud.

[Lazamataz]

One posting had the same bandito featured on Ralph's Mexifornia license (turns out it's the actor Alfonso Bedoya in "The Treasure of Sierra Madre") and said: "Borders? Borders? We don' need no steenking borders. We don't need no steekin' Roger Hernandez neither!"

I say, old chap. We are not terribly in favor of imaginary
national boundaries, and we are also somewhat nonplussed
at that scoundral, Roger Hernandez.

Better?

[Psycho_Bunny]

People like Roger - being intellectually incapable of understanding the importance of the Rule Of Law in government - are only capable of experiencing politics through emotions.

[nicmarlo]

Yoo hoo....what part of the following, specifically, do you NOT understand, Roger Hernandez?

The Law Against Hiring or Harboring Illegal Aliens

Federal Law--Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii)

A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he: assists an illegal alien she/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or encourages that illegal alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.

ILLEGAL HIRING:

Section 1324a: Any person who knowingly hires/harbors/transports any illegal alien is guilty of a felony punishable by 10 years jail + $2000 fine per illegal alien + forfeiture of the vehicle or property used to commit the crime.

CONSTRUCTIVE KNOWLEDGE:

An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts.⁽¹⁰⁾ Constructive knowledge constituting a violation of federal law has been found where (1) the I-9 employment eligibility form has not been properly completed, including supporting documentation, (2) the employer has learned from other individuals, media reports, or any source of information available to the employer, that the alien is unauthorized to work, or (3) the employer acts with reckless disregard for the legal consequences of permitting a third party to provide or introduce an illegal alien into the employer’s work force.⁽¹¹⁾ Knowledge cannot be inferred solely on the basis of an individual’s accent or foreign appearance. Actual specific knowledge is not required. For example, a newspaper article stating that ballrooms depend on an illegal alien workforce of dance hostesses was held by the courts to be a reasonable ground for suspicion that unlawful conduct had occurred.⁽¹²⁾

⁽¹⁰⁾8 CFR 274a.1(l).
⁽¹¹⁾8 CFR 274a.1(l)(1).
⁽¹²⁾Seven Star Inc. v. U.S., 933 F. 2d 791 (9th Cir., 1991).

CRIMINAL SOLICITATION
Section 100.10: Criminal solicitation in the second degree.

A person is guilty of criminal solicitation in the second degree when, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a class A felony, he solicits, requests, commands, importunes or otherwise attempts to cause such other person to engage in such conduct.

Criminal solicitation in the second degree is a class D felony.

In addition to the federal statutes....state laws and local ordinances controlling fair labor practices, workers compensation, zoning, safe housing and rental property, nuisance, licensing, street vending, and solicitations by contractors may also apply to activities that involve illegal aliens.

ILLEGAL ENTRY:

USC 8 Section 1325:

(a)....Any alien who:

(1) Enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or

(2) Eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or

(3) Attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under Title 18 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under Title 18, or imprisoned not more than two years or both.

(b) Improper time or place, civil penalties - Any alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to enter) the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty of

(1) at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or

(2) twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under this subsection. Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be imposed.

(c) Marriage fraud - Any individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or fined not more than $250,000 or both.

(d) Immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud - Any individual who knowingly establishes a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, fined in accordance with title 18, or both.

SHARING OF INFORMATION NOT RESTRICTED
Section 1644: Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, no State or local government entity may be prohibited, or in any way restricted, from sending to or receiving from the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of an alien in the United States (affirmed City of New York v. United States, No. 97-61820, ___, (2nd Cir. 1997); appealed from US v. Giuliani, (S.D.N.Y. 1996).

AUTHORITY TO ARREST
Section 1324c: All officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws shall have authority to make arrests for a violation of any provision of this section (affirmed United States v. Perez-Gonzalez, No. 01-3594, 307 F.3d 443, (6th Cir. 2002).

BTW, that applies to EVERYONE, whether or not their name ends with "ez"....is that EASY enough for you to understand????

[Recovering_Democrat]

Roger must be really angry his side LOST.

[unspun]

Race whiner.

[BillyZoom]

Another message came from a “Phil,” who wrote, “You can throw all those Viva La Raza talking points out all day long (never engage in debate, just cry racist/nativist/xenophobe).”

Hey!!! That’s me.

Can’t believe he actually read it.

But he called me estupido. Think I’ll go cry in my cervesa.

[SunkenCiv]

self-ping.

[bannie]

...are the president of the United States and the 46 senators who supported the bill that went down to defeat last week "eager" or merely "willing" to "destroy the USA."

Apparently, yes.

[Alkhin]

Roger Hernandez - I guess by this article and snippy way of responding to the freedom of expression in this country, you ultimately AGREE with Santa Ana who essentially TRASHED the 1824 Constitution of Mexico and basically said that the Mexican people were too stupid to live by the Rule of Law, that they deserved to live under a dictatorship of an egomaniacal politico who would decide for people what was good for them? Is that what you are saying should happen? Or do you suppose that the Rule of Mob is the way to go?

What a snippy little racist Roger Hernandez is. Anyone who wants to take away my Americanhood based on the fact that they dont like particular laws and think I should come under the management of a mob of barbarians should be run out of town on a rail.

ITS THE LEGALITY, STUPID!

[BillyZoom]

He quoted part of an e-mail I sent in his column which prompted a little back and forth. Nothing earth-shaking but I thought some here would be interested in reading it. I’ll start with my original e-mail.

LOL - Keep trying brother.

Blah, blah, blah.

If 12-20 million French speaking Caucasians from Quebec were in illegally in this country my position would be the same. Would yours?

Everyday more and more people are seeing through your brand of left-wing bigotry.

You can throw all those Viva La Raza talking points out all day long (never engage in debate just cry “Racist/natavist,xenophobe”; always label the anti-illegal immigrant crowd as anti-immigrant) but since majorities of Republicans, Independents AND Democrats who are against Amnesty and for border enforcement realize they’re not racist your primary propaganda weapon is becoming less effective everyday.

Peace

This is from his column:

Another message came from a “Phil,” who wrote, “You can throw all those Viva La Raza talking points out all day long (never engage in debate, just cry racist/nativist/xenophobe).”

Columnist sighs deeply, murmurs to himself, “But I do engage in debate, estupido,” then writes something about devoting five out of his past 10 columns to analysis of the pros and cons of the various immigration-reform bills.

My e-mail:

Estupido?!?

I wasn’t sure what that meant so I had my girlfriend (one of those damn race traitor coconuts) translate for me.

You’re going to make me cry - lol!

a “Phil”

For the race everything. For those outside the race, nothing.

Roger’s response:

Re: Estupido?!?

’ For the race everything. For those outside the race, nothing.” You know what that riffs on?

REH

My turn:

You mean it wasn’t an original bit of ethnic sloganeering? Bummer. To paraphrase Dean Vernon Wormer “Arrogant, bigoted and plagiaristic is no way to go through life, son.”

Hmmmm. The obvious answer would be some KKK/Neo-Nazi freaks but that wouldn’t look good for the La Raza/Mecha types so I doubt you’d offer it up if that were the case. Probably something out of left field. Mother Theresa? Eleanor Roosevelt? Bozo the Clown?

Am I close?

Roger’s turn:

Fidel Castro, 1970s. The original goes, “Within the revolution, everything. Outside the revolution, nothing.” It was meant to scare writers into submission.

REH

My turn:

Sounds like it was meant to scare anyone who opposed Castro into submission.

Since you seem to be in a chatty mood how about answering the question in my original e-mail.

If 12-20 million French speaking Caucasians from Quebec were in illegally in this country my position would be the same. Would yours?

Yes or no?

Roger’s turn:

As an immigrant myself, Yes.

REH

My turn:

Well, I’ve got several things I could say about that but I asked for a Yes or No and that’s what you gave.

And with that this hate-mongering, rabidly xenophobic, stridently nativist, pinche gabacho will say good night.

Peace

[SunkenCiv]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1863088/posts?page=2#2